Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CHA vs CBRL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Restaurants
CHA vs CBRL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $1.32B | $687M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13.27B | $3.36B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.80B | $-4M |
| Gross Margin | 47.2% | 25.4% |
| Operating Margin | 15.3% | -0.4% |
| Forward P/E | 1.2x | 14.9x |
| Total Debt | $548M | $1.13B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4.75B | $40M |
CHA vs CBRL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chagee Holdings Lim… (CHA) | 100 | 32.7 | -67.3% |
| Cracker Barrel Old … (CBRL) | 100 | 71.9 | -28.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CHA vs CBRL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CHA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.79
- Rev growth 167.4%, EPS growth 214.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.79, Low D/E 19.9%, current ratio 2.37x
CBRL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -45.5% 10Y total return vs CHA's -63.5%
- 3.3% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
- -25.6% vs CHA's -65.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 167.4% revenue growth vs CBRL's 0.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.2x vs 14.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.6% margin vs CBRL's -0.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.79 vs CBRL's 1.38, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.3% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -25.6% vs CHA's -65.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.1% ROA vs CBRL's -0.2% |
CHA vs CBRL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CHA vs CBRL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHA is the larger business by revenue, generating $13.3B annually — 3.9x CBRL's $3.4B. CHA is the more profitable business, keeping 13.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CBRL's -0.1%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13.3B | $3.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.0B | $120M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.8B | -$4M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.0B | -$21M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.2% | +25.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | -0.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.6% | -0.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.7% | -0.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.4% | -7.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -41.8% | -94.2% |
Valuation Metrics
CHA leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.4x trailing earnings, CHA trades at a 63% valuation discount to CBRL's 14.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CHA's 1.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CBRL's 9.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $687M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $703M | $1.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.45x | 14.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.20x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.63x | 9.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.73x | 0.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.98x | 1.49x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.47x | 11.40x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CHA leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CHA delivers a 20.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-1 for CBRL. CHA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CBRL's 2.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CHA scores 8/9 vs CBRL's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +20.8% | -0.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +15.1% | -0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +2.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +99.8% | +3.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.20x | 2.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4.2B | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4.8B | $40M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $548M | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -0.57x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CBRL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CHA five years ago would be worth $3,647 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,964 for CBRL. Over the past 12 months, CBRL leads with a -25.6% total return vs CHA's -65.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CBRL at -27.9% vs CHA's -28.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -11.0% | +16.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -65.8% | -25.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.5% | -62.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.5% | -70.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.5% | -45.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -28.6% | -27.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CHA and CBRL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CHA is the less volatile stock with a 0.79 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CBRL's 1.38 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CBRL currently trades 42.7% from its 52-week high vs CHA's 30.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.79x | 1.38x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $36.46 | $71.93 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.98 | $24.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +30.1% | +42.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.6 | 49.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 486K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CHA as "Buy" and CBRL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 27.7% upside for CHA (target: $14) vs -0.4% for CBRL (target: $31). CBRL is the only dividend payer here at 3.35% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.00 | $30.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.3% | +0.2% |
CHA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CBRL leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
CHA vs CBRL: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CHA or CBRL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) is the stronger pick with 167.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 4% for Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. (CBRL). Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) offers the better valuation at 5. 4x trailing P/E (1. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CHA or CBRL?
On trailing P/E, Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) is the cheapest at 5.
4x versus Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. at 14. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CHA or CBRL?
Over the past 5 years, Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) delivered a total return of -63.
5%, compared to -70. 4% for Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. (CBRL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CBRL returned -45. 5% versus CHA's -63. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CHA or CBRL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
79β versus Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. 's 1. 38β — meaning CBRL is approximately 76% more volatile than CHA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 20% versus 2% for Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CHA or CBRL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) is pulling ahead at 167.
4% versus 0. 4% for Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. (CBRL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares grew EPS 214. 4% year-over-year, compared to 12. 6% for Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CHA or CBRL?
Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
3% net margin versus 1. 3% for Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CHA leads at 23. 3% versus 1. 6% for CBRL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CHA leads at 45. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CHA or CBRL more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CHA: 27.
7% to $14. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CHA or CBRL?
In this comparison, CBRL (3.
3% yield) pays a dividend. CHA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CHA or CBRL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
79)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CHA: -63. 5%, CBRL: -45. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CHA and CBRL?
These companies operate in different sectors (CHA (Consumer Defensive) and CBRL (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CHA is a small-cap high-growth stock; CBRL is a small-cap deep-value stock. CBRL pays a dividend while CHA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.