CHNR
China Natural Resources, Inc.
Waste Management
Market Cap$41M
5Y Perf.-86.7%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
CHNR vs SOS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
SOS
SOS Limited
Software - Infrastructure
Market Cap$3M
5Y Perf.-99.9%
CHNR vs SOS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | CHNR | SOS |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Waste Management | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $41M | $3M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $346M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-14M | $-24M |
| Gross Margin | — | 3.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | -9.5% |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $237M |
CHNR vs SOS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
CHNR
SOS
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| China Natural Resou… (CHNR) | 100 | 13.3 | -86.7% |
| SOS Limited (SOS) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CHNR vs SOS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: CHNR leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. SOS Limited is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and operational efficiency and capital deployment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CHNR
China Natural Resources, Inc.
The Income Pick
CHNR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.12
- -93.7% 10Y total return vs SOS's -100.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.12, current ratio 0.25x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
SOS
SOS Limited
The Growth Play
SOS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 150.4%, EPS growth -82.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.3%
- 150.4% revenue growth vs CHNR's -100.0%
- -4.9% ROA vs CHNR's -5.3%, ROIC -9.5% vs -0.0%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | SOS | 150.4% revenue growth vs CHNR's -100.0% |
| Quality / Margins | CHNR | 0.0% margin vs SOS's -7.0% |
| Stability / Safety | CHNR | Beta 1.12 vs SOS's 2.01 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | CHNR | -2.5% vs SOS's -76.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | SOS | -4.9% ROA vs CHNR's -5.3%, ROIC -9.5% vs -0.0% |
CHNR vs SOS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2024
CHNR vs SOS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCHNRLAGGINGSOS
SOSSOS Limited
1leads
CHNRChina Natural Resourc…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs SOSMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
CHNR1/1
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
SOS4/6
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
CHNR6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
CHNR2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHNR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SOS and CHNR operate at a comparable scale, with $346M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | CHNRChina Natural Res… | SOSSOS Limited |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $346M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$12M | -$15M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$14M | -$24M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | -$141.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +3.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -9.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -7.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -407.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +48.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +91.3% | +33.3% |
CHNR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CHNR and SOS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CHNRChina Natural Res… | SOSSOS Limited |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $41M | $3M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $41M | -$234M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -88.42x | -0.25x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.01x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.20x | 0.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Evenly matched — CHNR and SOS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SOS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SOS delivers a -5.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-6 in annual profit, vs $-16 for CHNR. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SOS scores 3/9 vs CHNR's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | CHNRChina Natural Res… | SOSSOS Limited |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -15.7% | -5.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.3% | -4.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.0% | -9.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.0% | -5.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | -$237M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $237M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -263.29x | — |
SOS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CHNR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CHNR five years ago would be worth $718 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4 for SOS. Over the past 12 months, CHNR leads with a -2.5% total return vs SOS's -76.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CHNR at -41.3% vs SOS's -74.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CHNRChina Natural Res… | SOSSOS Limited |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.6% | -26.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -2.5% | -76.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.8% | -98.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.8% | -100.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.7% | -100.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -41.3% | -74.5% |
CHNR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CHNR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CHNR is the less volatile stock with a 1.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SOS's 2.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CHNR currently trades 52.2% from its 52-week high vs SOS's 11.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CHNRChina Natural Res… | SOSSOS Limited |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.12x | 2.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.20 | $9.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.16 | $0.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +52.2% | +11.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.7 | 49.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 893K | 117K |
CHNR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | CHNRChina Natural Res… | SOSSOS Limited |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
CHNR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). SOS leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
Best OverallChina Natural Resources, In… (CHNR)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
CHNR vs SOS: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Which is the better long-term investment — CHNR or SOS?
Over the past 5 years, China Natural Resources, Inc.
(CHNR) delivered a total return of -92. 8%, compared to -100. 0% for SOS Limited (SOS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CHNR returned -93. 5% versus SOS's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
02Which is safer — CHNR or SOS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), China Natural Resources, Inc.
(CHNR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 12β versus SOS Limited's 2. 01β — meaning SOS is approximately 80% more volatile than CHNR relative to the S&P 500.
03Which is growing faster — CHNR or SOS?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: China Natural Resources, Inc.
grew EPS 95. 9% year-over-year, compared to -82. 3% for SOS Limited. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
04Which has better profit margins — CHNR or SOS?
China Natural Resources, Inc.
(CHNR) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -5. 9% for SOS Limited — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CHNR leads at 0. 0% versus -9. 3% for SOS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SOS leads at 3. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — CHNR or SOS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is CHNR or SOS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, China Natural Resources, Inc.
(CHNR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 12)). SOS Limited (SOS) carries a higher beta of 2. 01 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CHNR: -93. 5%, SOS: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between CHNR and SOS?
These companies operate in different sectors (CHNR (Industrials) and SOS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CHNR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SOS is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.