Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) vs Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CLBT | 18.6% revenue growth vs MSFT's 14.9% |
| Value | CLBT | PEG 0.62 vs 1.27 |
| Quality / Margins | MSFT | 39.0% net margin vs CLBT's 16.5% |
| Stability / Safety | CLBT | Beta 0.83 vs MSFT's 0.88, lower leverage |
| Dividends | MSFT | 0.8% yield; 19-year raise streak; CLBT pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | MSFT | -0.2% vs CLBT's -28.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MSFT | 17.9% ROA vs CLBT's 8.3%, ROIC 27.9% vs 18.5% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Valuation efficiency (growth/$)
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Cellebrite provides digital intelligence solutions for legally sanctioned investigations by law enforcement and government agencies. It generates revenue primarily from software licenses and maintenance fees for its forensic data extraction and analysis platforms — including its Universal Forensic Extraction Device and DI platform — which help investigators access and analyze digital evidence from locked, encrypted, or deleted sources. The company's key advantage is its deep technical expertise in overcoming device security barriers and its established relationships with government agencies worldwide, creating high switching costs in a specialized, regulated market.
Microsoft is a global technology company that develops software, cloud services, and hardware products. It generates revenue primarily through cloud services like Azure (~40% of revenue), productivity software including Office 365 and Dynamics, and personal computing through Windows licensing and Surface devices. Its key competitive advantage is the deeply entrenched enterprise ecosystem—Windows and Office dominance creates a powerful network effect that drives adoption of its cloud and productivity suites.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
MSFT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). CLBT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
MSFT is the larger business by revenue, generating $305.5B annually — 642.1x CLBT's $476M. MSFT is the more profitable business, keeping 39.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CLBT's 16.5%.
| Metric | CLBTCellebrite DI Ltd. | MSFTMicrosoft Corpora… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $476M | $305.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $78M | $184.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $78M | $119.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $160M | $77.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +84.2% | +68.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.0% | +46.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.5% | +39.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +33.7% | +25.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.1% | +16.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.7% | +59.8% |
Valuation Metrics
At 28.8x trailing earnings, MSFT trades at a 33% valuation discount to CLBT's 43.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CLBT offers better value at 0.73x vs MSFT's 1.53x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | CLBTCellebrite DI Ltd. | MSFTMicrosoft Corpora… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.3B | $2.92T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.2B | $2.95T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 43.03x | 28.79x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 36.25x | 23.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.73x | 1.53x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 40.33x | 18.12x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.86x | 10.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.88x | 8.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.34x | 40.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MSFT delivers a 30.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $16 for CLBT. CLBT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MSFT's 0.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MSFT scores 6/9 vs CLBT's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | CLBTCellebrite DI Ltd. | MSFTMicrosoft Corpora… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.2% | +30.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.3% | +17.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +18.5% | +27.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.8% | +29.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$102M | $30.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $124M | $30.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $23M | $60.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 56.44x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in MSFT five years ago would be worth $17,186 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,549 for CLBT. Over the past 12 months, MSFT leads with a -0.2% total return vs CLBT's -28.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLBT at 29.4% vs MSFT's 17.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CLBTCellebrite DI Ltd. | MSFTMicrosoft Corpora… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -25.2% | -16.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -28.1% | -0.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +116.9% | +61.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.5% | +71.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +38.1% | +718.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +29.4% | +17.3% |
Risk & Volatility
CLBT is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MSFT's 0.88 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MSFT currently trades 70.7% from its 52-week high vs CLBT's 64.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CLBTCellebrite DI Ltd. | MSFTMicrosoft Corpora… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.83x | 0.88x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.86 | $555.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.76 | $344.79 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.0% | +70.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.9 | 39.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 28.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CLBT as "Buy" and MSFT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 54.9% upside for CLBT (target: $21) vs 48.6% for MSFT (target: $584). MSFT is the only dividend payer here at 0.82% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | CLBTCellebrite DI Ltd. | MSFTMicrosoft Corpora… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.67 | $583.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 78 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 19 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.23 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.6% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Nov 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) | 100 | 154.24 | +54.2% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 100 | 195.81 | +95.8% |
Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) returned +72% over 5 years vs Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT)'s +25%. A $10,000 investment in MSFT 5 years ago would be worth $17,186 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) | $172M | $476M | +176.8% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | $91.2B | $281.7B | +209.1% |
Microsoft Corporation's revenue grew from $91.2B (2016) to $281.7B (2025) — a 13.4% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) | -1.1% | 16.5% | +1608.5% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 22.5% | 36.1% | +60.4% |
Microsoft Corporation's net margin went from 23% (2016) to 36% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) | 340.8 | 58.2 | -82.9% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 26.3 | 35.5 | +35.0% |
Cellebrite DI Ltd. has traded in a 7x–341x P/E range over 4 years; current trailing P/E is ~43x. Microsoft Corporation has traded in a 25x–48x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~29x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) | -0.01 | 0.31 | +3200.0% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 2.1 | 13.64 | +549.5% |
Microsoft Corporation's EPS grew from $2.10 (2016) to $13.64 (2025) — a 23% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Cellebrite DI Ltd. generated $160M FCF in 2025 (+474% vs 2021). Microsoft Corporation generated $72B FCF in 2025 (+28% vs 2021).
CLBT vs MSFT: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CLBT or MSFT a better buy right now?
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) offers the better valuation at 28.8x trailing P/E (23.8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CLBT or MSFT?
On trailing P/E, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the cheapest at 28.8x versus Cellebrite DI Ltd. at 43.0x. On forward P/E, Microsoft Corporation is actually cheaper at 23.8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Cellebrite DI Ltd. wins at 0.62x versus Microsoft Corporation's 1.27x — a PEG below 1.0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CLBT or MSFT?
Over the past 5 years, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) delivered a total return of +71.9%, compared to +25.5% for Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT). A $10,000 investment in MSFT five years ago would be worth approximately $17K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSFT returned +718.2% versus CLBT's +38.1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CLBT or MSFT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.83β versus Microsoft Corporation's 0.88β — meaning MSFT is approximately 7% more volatile than CLBT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 18% for Microsoft Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — CLBT or MSFT?
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the more profitable company, earning 36.1% net margin versus 16.5% for Cellebrite DI Ltd. — meaning it keeps 36.1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSFT leads at 45.6% versus 14.0% for CLBT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLBT leads at 84.2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is CLBT or MSFT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential. By this metric, Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0.62x versus Microsoft Corporation's 1.27x. A PEG below 1.0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) trades at 23.8x forward P/E versus 36.3x for Cellebrite DI Ltd. — 12.4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CLBT: 54.9% to $20.67.
07Which pays a better dividend — CLBT or MSFT?
In this comparison, MSFT (0.8% yield) pays a dividend. CLBT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is CLBT or MSFT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.88), 0.8% yield, +718.2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSFT: +718.2%, CLBT: +38.1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CLBT and MSFT?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. MSFT pays a dividend while CLBT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.