CLCO
Cool Company Ltd.
Marine Shipping
Market Cap$511M
5Y Perf.-19.6%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
CLCO vs LNG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
LNG
Cheniere Energy, Inc.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$51.94B
5Y Perf.+23.3%
CLCO vs LNG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | CLCO | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $511M | $51.94B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $331M | $20.27B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $59M | $1.48B |
| Gross Margin | 61.8% | 27.2% |
| Operating Margin | 43.1% | 4.8% |
| Forward P/E | 12.1x | 16.6x |
| Total Debt | $1.31B | $28.61B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $165M | $1.58B |
CLCO vs LNG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
CLCO
LNG
| Stock | Mar 23 | Jan 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cool Company Ltd. (CLCO) | 100 | 80.4 | -19.6% |
| Cheniere Energy, In… (LNG) | 100 | 123.3 | +23.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CLCO vs LNG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: CLCO leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Cheniere Energy, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and operational efficiency and capital deployment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CLCO
Cool Company Ltd.
The Income Pick
CLCO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.16, yield 14.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.16, current ratio 0.73x
- Beta 0.16, yield 14.2%, current ratio 0.73x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
LNG
Cheniere Energy, Inc.
The Growth Play
LNG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 24.4%, EPS growth 69.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -16.5%
- 6.9% 10Y total return vs CLCO's 1.9%
- 24.4% revenue growth vs CLCO's -10.8%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | LNG | 24.4% revenue growth vs CLCO's -10.8% |
| Value | CLCO | Lower P/E (12.1x vs 16.6x) |
| Quality / Margins | CLCO | 17.8% margin vs LNG's 7.3% |
| Stability / Safety | CLCO | Lower D/E ratio (171.9% vs 218.8%) |
| Dividends | CLCO | 14.2% yield, vs LNG's 0.8% |
| Momentum (1Y) | CLCO | +62.5% vs LNG's +4.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | LNG | 3.2% ROA vs CLCO's 2.6%, ROIC 10.9% vs 6.7% |
CLCO vs LNG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2024
CLCO vs LNG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCLCOLAGGINGLNG
LNGCheniere Energy, Inc.
2leads
CLCOCool Company Ltd.
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs LNGMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
CLCO4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
CLCO5/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
LNG6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
LNG5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLCO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LNG is the larger business by revenue, generating $20.3B annually — 61.2x CLCO's $331M. CLCO is the more profitable business, keeping 17.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LNG's 7.3%.
| Metric | CLCOCool Company Ltd. | LNGCheniere Energy, … |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $331M | $20.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $222M | $2.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $59M | $1.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$348M | $5.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.8% | +27.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +43.1% | +4.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.8% | +7.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -105.0% | +26.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.9% | +10.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -11.6% |
CLCO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
CLCO leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.3x trailing earnings, CLCO trades at a 48% valuation discount to LNG's 10.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CLCO's 7.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LNG's 10.9x.
| Metric | CLCOCool Company Ltd. | LNGCheniere Energy, … |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $511M | $51.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.7B | $79.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.31x | 10.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.09x | 16.58x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.41x | 10.88x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.59x | 2.65x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.68x | 4.16x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 21.10x |
CLCO leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LNG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LNG delivers a 14.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $7 for CLCO. CLCO carries lower financial leverage with a 1.72x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LNG's 2.19x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LNG scores 7/9 vs CLCO's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | CLCOCool Company Ltd. | LNGCheniere Energy, … |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.5% | +14.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.6% | +3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.7% | +10.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.7% | +12.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.72x | 2.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.1B | $27.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $165M | $1.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.3B | $28.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.36x | 17.70x |
LNG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LNG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LNG five years ago would be worth $30,841 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,188 for CLCO. Over the past 12 months, CLCO leads with a +62.5% total return vs LNG's +4.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LNG at 19.1% vs CLCO's 2.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CLCOCool Company Ltd. | LNGCheniere Energy, … |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.3% | +25.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +62.5% | +4.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.2% | +69.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.9% | +208.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.9% | +692.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.0% | +19.1% |
LNG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CLCO and LNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LNG is the less volatile stock with a -0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CLCO's 0.16 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLCO currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs LNG's 82.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CLCOCool Company Ltd. | LNGCheniere Energy, … |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.16x | -0.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.00 | $300.89 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.78 | $186.70 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.7% | +82.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.8 | 46.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 104K | 3.3M |
Evenly matched — CLCO and LNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CLCO and LNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CLCO as "Hold" and LNG as "Buy". For income investors, CLCO offers the higher dividend yield at 14.24% vs LNG's 0.83%.
| Metric | CLCOCool Company Ltd. | LNGCheniere Energy, … |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $265.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +14.2% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.38 | $2.05 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.2% |
Evenly matched — CLCO and LNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
CLCO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). LNG leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
Best OverallCool Company Ltd. (CLCO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
CLCO vs LNG: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CLCO or LNG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cheniere Energy, Inc.
(LNG) is the stronger pick with 24. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 8% for Cool Company Ltd. (CLCO). Cool Company Ltd. (CLCO) offers the better valuation at 5. 3x trailing P/E (12. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) a "Buy" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CLCO or LNG?
On trailing P/E, Cool Company Ltd.
(CLCO) is the cheapest at 5. 3x versus Cheniere Energy, Inc. at 10. 2x. On forward P/E, Cool Company Ltd. is actually cheaper at 12. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CLCO or LNG?
Over the past 5 years, Cheniere Energy, Inc.
(LNG) delivered a total return of +208. 4%, compared to +1. 9% for Cool Company Ltd. (CLCO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LNG returned +692. 8% versus CLCO's +1. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CLCO or LNG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cheniere Energy, Inc.
(LNG) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 33β versus Cool Company Ltd. 's 0. 16β — meaning CLCO is approximately -149% more volatile than LNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cool Company Ltd. (CLCO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 172% versus 2% for Cheniere Energy, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CLCO or LNG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cheniere Energy, Inc.
(LNG) is pulling ahead at 24. 4% versus -10. 8% for Cool Company Ltd. (CLCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cheniere Energy, Inc. grew EPS 69. 9% year-over-year, compared to -44. 0% for Cool Company Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CLCO leads at 25. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CLCO or LNG?
Cool Company Ltd.
(CLCO) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 4% net margin versus 27. 1% for Cheniere Energy, Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLCO leads at 50. 5% versus 27. 0% for LNG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLCO leads at 76. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CLCO or LNG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Cool Company Ltd.
(CLCO) trades at 12. 1x forward P/E versus 16. 6x for Cheniere Energy, Inc. — 4. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — CLCO or LNG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Cool Company Ltd. (CLCO) offers the highest yield at 14. 2%, versus 0. 8% for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG).
09Is CLCO or LNG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cheniere Energy, Inc.
(LNG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 33), 0. 8% yield, +692. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LNG: +692. 8%, CLCO: +1. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CLCO and LNG?
These companies operate in different sectors (CLCO (Industrials) and LNG (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CLCO is a small-cap deep-value stock; LNG is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(CLCO: 9.9% · LNG: 10.2%)Net Margin>
%
(CLCO: 17.8% · LNG: 7.3%)P/E Ratio<
x
(CLCO: 5.3x · LNG: 10.2x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.