Medical - Healthcare Plans
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
CLOV vs HUM vs CVS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Healthcare Plans
Medical - Healthcare Plans
CLOV vs HUM vs CVS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Healthcare Plans | Medical - Healthcare Plans | Medical - Healthcare Plans |
| Market Cap | $1.44B | $29.67B | $111.40B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.21B | $137.20B | $407.90B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-57M | $1.13B | $2.93B |
| Gross Margin | 42.5% | 14.0% | 13.9% |
| Operating Margin | -2.6% | 1.0% | 1.5% |
| Forward P/E | 65.9x | 27.7x | 12.2x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $12.94B | $93.59B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $78M | $4.20B | $8.51B |
CLOV vs HUM vs CVS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clover Health Inves… (CLOV) | 100 | 25.2 | -74.8% |
| Humana Inc. (HUM) | 100 | 63.7 | -36.3% |
| CVS Health Corporat… (CVS) | 100 | 134.4 | +34.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CLOV vs HUM vs CVS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CLOV is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 40.3%, EPS growth -93.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 20.6%
- 40.3% revenue growth vs CVS's 7.8%
HUM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 59.8% 10Y total return vs CVS's 3.5%
- 2.2% ROA vs CLOV's -9.6%, ROIC 4.1% vs -34.0%
CVS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.05, yield 3.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.05, current ratio 0.84x
- Beta 0.05, yield 3.1%, current ratio 0.84x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 40.3% revenue growth vs CVS's 7.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.2x vs 27.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 1.0 vs CLOV's 1.0 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.05 vs CLOV's 1.22 | |
| Dividends | 3.1% yield, vs HUM's 1.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +34.7% vs CLOV's -25.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.2% ROA vs CLOV's -9.6%, ROIC 4.1% vs -34.0% |
CLOV vs HUM vs CVS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CLOV vs HUM vs CVS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLOV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CVS is the larger business by revenue, generating $407.9B annually — 184.5x CLOV's $2.2B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 0.8% (HUM) to -2.6% (CLOV). On growth, CLOV holds the edge at +62.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.2B | $137.2B | $407.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$55M | $2.2B | $10.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$57M | $1.1B | $2.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $55M | $1.3B | $7.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +42.5% | +14.0% | +13.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | +1.0% | +1.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | +0.8% | +0.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.5% | +0.9% | +1.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +62.0% | +23.5% | +6.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -4.6% | +63.1% |
Valuation Metrics
CVS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 25.1x trailing earnings, HUM trades at a 60% valuation discount to CVS's 62.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CVS's 13.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HUM's 16.9x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $29.7B | $111.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.4B | $38.4B | $196.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -16.59x | 25.12x | 62.81x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 65.89x | 27.68x | 12.19x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 16.87x | 13.11x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.75x | 0.23x | 0.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.72x | 1.68x | 1.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 79.13x | 14.27x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HUM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HUM delivers a 6.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-17 for CLOV. HUM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.73x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CVS's 1.24x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HUM scores 5/9 vs CLOV's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -17.1% | +6.2% | +3.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -9.6% | +2.2% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -34.0% | +4.1% | +5.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -24.5% | +4.0% | +6.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.73x | 1.24x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$78M | $8.7B | $85.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $78M | $4.2B | $8.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $12.9B | $93.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 3.08x | 2.11x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CLOV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CVS five years ago would be worth $11,700 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,271 for CLOV. Over the past 12 months, CVS leads with a +34.7% total return vs CLOV's -25.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLOV at 47.6% vs HUM's -21.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.0% | -6.2% | +10.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -25.2% | -1.0% | +34.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +221.7% | -51.9% | +36.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.3% | -43.3% | +17.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.4% | +59.8% | +3.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +47.6% | -21.7% | +11.0% |
Risk & Volatility
CVS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CVS is the less volatile stock with a 0.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CLOV's 1.22 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CVS currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs CLOV's 71.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.22x | 0.56x | 0.05x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.92 | $315.35 | $88.63 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.58 | $163.11 | $58.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.9% | +78.4% | +98.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.5 | 76.6 | 69.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.6M | 1.6M | 7.4M |
Analyst Outlook
CVS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CLOV as "Hold", HUM as "Hold", CVS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 18.1% upside for CLOV (target: $3) vs -0.5% for HUM (target: $246). For income investors, CVS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.06% vs HUM's 1.44%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.33 | $246.00 | $95.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 44 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.4% | +3.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.56 | $2.67 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.8% | +0.5% | 0.0% |
CVS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). CLOV leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns).
CLOV vs HUM vs CVS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CLOV or HUM or CVS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Clover Health Investments, Corp.
(CLOV) is the stronger pick with 40. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 8% for CVS Health Corporation (CVS). Humana Inc. (HUM) offers the better valuation at 25. 1x trailing P/E (27. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CVS Health Corporation (CVS) a "Buy" — based on 41 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CLOV or HUM or CVS?
On trailing P/E, Humana Inc.
(HUM) is the cheapest at 25. 1x versus CVS Health Corporation at 62. 8x. On forward P/E, CVS Health Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CLOV or HUM or CVS?
Over the past 5 years, CVS Health Corporation (CVS) delivered a total return of +17.
0%, compared to -67. 3% for Clover Health Investments, Corp. (CLOV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HUM returned +59. 8% versus CLOV's -72. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CLOV or HUM or CVS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CVS Health Corporation (CVS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
05β versus Clover Health Investments, Corp. 's 1. 22β — meaning CLOV is approximately 2312% more volatile than CVS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Humana Inc. (HUM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 73% versus 124% for CVS Health Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CLOV or HUM or CVS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Clover Health Investments, Corp.
(CLOV) is pulling ahead at 40. 3% versus 7. 8% for CVS Health Corporation (CVS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Humana Inc. grew EPS -1. 4% year-over-year, compared to -93. 6% for Clover Health Investments, Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CLOV leads at 20. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CLOV or HUM or CVS?
Humana Inc.
(HUM) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 9% net margin versus -4. 4% for Clover Health Investments, Corp. — meaning it keeps 0. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVS leads at 2. 6% versus -4. 4% for CLOV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLOV leads at 18. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CLOV or HUM or CVS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, CVS Health Corporation (CVS) trades at 12.
2x forward P/E versus 65. 9x for Clover Health Investments, Corp. — 53. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CLOV: 18. 1% to $3. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — CLOV or HUM or CVS?
In this comparison, CVS (3.
1% yield), HUM (1. 4% yield) pay a dividend. CLOV does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CLOV or HUM or CVS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CVS Health Corporation (CVS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
05), 3. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CVS: +3. 5%, CLOV: -72. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CLOV and HUM and CVS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CLOV is a small-cap high-growth stock; HUM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CVS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. HUM, CVS pay a dividend while CLOV does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.