CMPR vs SSTK

For growth investors, Shutterstock, Inc.

(SSTK) is the stronger pick with 5. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 4% for Cimpress plc (CMPR). Shutterstock, Inc. (SSTK) offers the better valuation at 13. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cimpress plc (CMPR) a "Hold" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Shutterstock, Inc.

(SSTK) is the cheapest at 13. 6x versus Cimpress plc at 158. 6x.

Over the past 5 years, Cimpress plc (CMPR) delivered a total return of -9.

4%, compared to -73. 5% for Shutterstock, Inc. (SSTK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CMPR returned -1. 9% versus SSTK's -34. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cimpress plc (CMPR) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

25β versus Shutterstock, Inc. 's 1. 48β — meaning SSTK is approximately 18% more volatile than CMPR relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shutterstock, Inc.

(SSTK) is pulling ahead at 5. 8% versus 3. 4% for Cimpress plc (CMPR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Shutterstock, Inc. grew EPS 23. 8% year-over-year, compared to -91. 0% for Cimpress plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, SSTK leads at 6. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Shutterstock, Inc.

(SSTK) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 6% net margin versus 0. 4% for Cimpress plc — meaning it keeps 4. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SSTK leads at 11. 1% versus 6. 6% for CMPR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SSTK leads at 58. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SSTK: 294.

5% to $67. 00.

In this comparison, SSTK (7.

6% yield) pays a dividend. CMPR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Shutterstock, Inc.

(SSTK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (7. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SSTK: -34. 5%, CMPR: -1. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CMPR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SSTK is a small-cap deep-value stock. SSTK pays a dividend while CMPR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.