Medical - Care Facilities
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CMPS vs CYBN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
CMPS vs CYBN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Care Facilities | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $938M | $304M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-288M | $-123M |
| Total Debt | $21M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $150M | $135M |
CMPS vs CYBN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| COMPASS Pathways plc (CMPS) | 100 | 26.9 | -73.1% |
| Cybin Inc. (CYBN) | 100 | 33.3 | -66.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CMPS vs CYBN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CMPS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.33
- -66.3% 10Y total return vs CYBN's -99.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.33, current ratio 0.77x
CYBN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- EPS growth 93.5%
- -57.3% revenue growth vs CMPS's -85.7%
- 3.2% margin vs CMPS's 1.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -57.3% revenue growth vs CMPS's -85.7% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.2% margin vs CMPS's 1.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.33 vs CYBN's 1.52 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +167.4% vs CYBN's +0.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -58.3% ROA vs CMPS's -106.8% |
CMPS vs CYBN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CMPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CMPS and CYBN operate at a comparable scale, with $0 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$179M | -$147M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$288M | -$123M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$157M | -$106M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -58.7% | -8.2% |
Valuation Metrics
CYBN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $938M | $304M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $809M | $205M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.17x | -13.66x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 6.52x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CYBN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CYBN delivers a -81.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-81 in annual profit, vs $-3 for CMPS. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CYBN scores 3/9 vs CMPS's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.4% | -81.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -106.8% | -58.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -115.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.5% | -54.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$129M | -$135M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $150M | $135M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $21M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -52.40x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CMPS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CMPS five years ago would be worth $2,816 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $932 for CYBN. Over the past 12 months, CMPS leads with a +167.4% total return vs CYBN's +0.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CMPS at 4.9% vs CYBN's -20.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +49.0% | -26.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +167.4% | +0.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.4% | -49.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.8% | -90.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.3% | -99.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.9% | -20.5% |
Risk & Volatility
CMPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CMPS is the less volatile stock with a 1.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CYBN's 1.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CMPS currently trades 95.6% from its 52-week high vs CYBN's 62.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.33x | 1.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.21 | $9.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.25 | $5.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.6% | +62.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.2 | 35.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.7M | 292K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CMPS as "Buy" and CYBN as "Buy".
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.83 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CMPS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). CYBN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
CMPS vs CYBN: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CMPS or CYBN a better buy right now?
Analysts rate COMPASS Pathways plc (CMPS) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison.
The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CMPS or CYBN?
Over the past 5 years, COMPASS Pathways plc (CMPS) delivered a total return of -71.
8%, compared to -90. 7% for Cybin Inc. (CYBN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CMPS returned -67. 6% versus CYBN's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CMPS or CYBN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), COMPASS Pathways plc (CMPS) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
33β versus Cybin Inc. 's 1. 52β — meaning CYBN is approximately 14% more volatile than CMPS relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — CMPS or CYBN?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cybin Inc.
grew EPS 93. 5% year-over-year, compared to -33. 9% for COMPASS Pathways plc. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CMPS or CYBN?
COMPASS Pathways plc (CMPS) is the more profitable company, earning 0.
0% net margin versus 0. 0% for Cybin Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CMPS leads at 0. 0% versus 0. 0% for CYBN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CMPS leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CMPS or CYBN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is CMPS or CYBN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, COMPASS Pathways plc (CMPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.
Cybin Inc. (CYBN) carries a higher beta of 1. 52 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CMPS: -67. 6%, CYBN: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CMPS and CYBN?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.