Agricultural - Machinery
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CNH vs AGCO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural - Machinery
CNH vs AGCO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural - Machinery | Agricultural - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $13.42B | $8.71B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $18.09B | $10.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $386M | $771M |
| Gross Margin | 31.4% | 24.9% |
| Operating Margin | 14.6% | 6.9% |
| Forward P/E | 26.1x | 20.8x |
| Total Debt | $27.03B | $2.69B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.23B | $862M |
CNH vs AGCO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNH Industrial N.V. (CNH) | 100 | 175.9 | +75.9% |
| AGCO Corporation (AGCO) | 100 | 217.7 | +117.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CNH vs AGCO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CNH is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.15, yield 2.5%
- Rev growth -8.8%, EPS growth -58.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -8.4%
- Beta 1.15, yield 2.5%, current ratio 7.75x
AGCO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 181.1% 10Y total return vs CNH's 81.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.10, Low D/E 58.7%, current ratio 1.39x
- Lower P/E (20.8x vs 26.1x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -8.8% revenue growth vs AGCO's -13.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.8x vs 26.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.4% margin vs CNH's 2.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.10 vs CNH's 1.15, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, vs AGCO's 1.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +28.7% vs CNH's -10.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.3% ROA vs CNH's 0.9%, ROIC 8.3% vs 6.6% |
CNH vs AGCO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CNH vs AGCO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CNH and AGCO each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CNH is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.1B annually — 1.7x AGCO's $10.4B. AGCO is the more profitable business, keeping 7.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CNH's 2.1%. On growth, AGCO holds the edge at +14.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $18.1B | $10.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.3B | $963M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $386M | $771M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.8B | $546M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.4% | +24.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.6% | +6.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.1% | +7.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.2% | +5.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.1% | +14.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -94.4% | +4.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CNH and AGCO each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.3x trailing earnings, AGCO trades at a 53% valuation discount to CNH's 26.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AGCO's 10.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CNH's 10.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13.4B | $8.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $37.2B | $10.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 26.39x | 12.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 26.07x | 20.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.07x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.89x | 10.26x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.74x | 0.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.73x | 1.96x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.73x | 11.76x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AGCO leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AGCO delivers a 16.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $5 for CNH. AGCO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.59x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CNH's 3.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AGCO scores 8/9 vs CNH's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.9% | +16.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +6.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.6% | +8.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.3% | +9.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.45x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $23.8B | $1.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.2B | $862M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $27.0B | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.76x | 10.36x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AGCO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AGCO five years ago would be worth $9,038 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,508 for CNH. Over the past 12 months, AGCO leads with a +28.7% total return vs CNH's -10.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AGCO at 1.1% vs CNH's -7.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.7% | +13.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -10.6% | +28.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -20.0% | +3.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -24.9% | -9.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +81.4% | +181.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.2% | +1.1% |
Risk & Volatility
AGCO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AGCO is the less volatile stock with a 1.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CNH's 1.15 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AGCO currently trades 83.6% from its 52-week high vs CNH's 75.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.15x | 1.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.27 | $143.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.00 | $93.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.8% | +83.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.5 | 44.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 15.2M | 698K |
Analyst Outlook
CNH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CNH as "Buy" and AGCO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.5% upside for CNH (target: $13) vs 5.9% for AGCO (target: $127). For income investors, CNH offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs AGCO's 0.97%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.25 | $127.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.5% | +1.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.27 | $1.16 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.9% |
AGCO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). CNH leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
CNH vs AGCO: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CNH or AGCO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CNH Industrial N.
V. (CNH) is the stronger pick with -8. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 5% for AGCO Corporation (AGCO). AGCO Corporation (AGCO) offers the better valuation at 12. 3x trailing P/E (20. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CNH Industrial N. V. (CNH) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CNH or AGCO?
On trailing P/E, AGCO Corporation (AGCO) is the cheapest at 12.
3x versus CNH Industrial N. V. at 26. 4x. On forward P/E, AGCO Corporation is actually cheaper at 20. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CNH or AGCO?
Over the past 5 years, AGCO Corporation (AGCO) delivered a total return of -9.
6%, compared to -24. 9% for CNH Industrial N. V. (CNH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AGCO returned +181. 1% versus CNH's +81. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CNH or AGCO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AGCO Corporation (AGCO) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
10β versus CNH Industrial N. V. 's 1. 15β — meaning CNH is approximately 5% more volatile than AGCO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AGCO Corporation (AGCO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 59% versus 3% for CNH Industrial N. V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CNH or AGCO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CNH Industrial N.
V. (CNH) is pulling ahead at -8. 8% versus -13. 5% for AGCO Corporation (AGCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AGCO Corporation grew EPS 271. 4% year-over-year, compared to -58. 6% for CNH Industrial N. V.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AGCO leads at -7. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CNH or AGCO?
AGCO Corporation (AGCO) is the more profitable company, earning 7.
2% net margin versus 2. 8% for CNH Industrial N. V. — meaning it keeps 7. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CNH leads at 15. 4% versus 6. 9% for AGCO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CNH leads at 31. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CNH or AGCO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, AGCO Corporation (AGCO) trades at 20.
8x forward P/E versus 26. 1x for CNH Industrial N. V. — 5. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CNH: 22. 5% to $13. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — CNH or AGCO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
CNH Industrial N. V. (CNH) offers the highest yield at 2. 5%, versus 1. 0% for AGCO Corporation (AGCO).
09Is CNH or AGCO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AGCO Corporation (AGCO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
10), 1. 0% yield, +181. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AGCO: +181. 1%, CNH: +81. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CNH and AGCO?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CNH is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AGCO is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.