CRAI vs HURN

For growth investors, Huron Consulting Group Inc.

(HURN) is the stronger pick with 14. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 3% for CRA International, Inc. (CRAI). CRA International, Inc. (CRAI) offers the better valuation at 18. 8x trailing P/E (18. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CRA International, Inc. (CRAI) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, CRA International, Inc.

(CRAI) is the cheapest at 18. 8x versus Huron Consulting Group Inc. at 20. 6x. On forward P/E, Huron Consulting Group Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Huron Consulting Group Inc.

(HURN) delivered a total return of +113. 2%, compared to +90. 7% for CRA International, Inc. (CRAI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CRAI returned +619. 1% versus HURN's +108. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CRA International, Inc.

(CRAI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 73β versus Huron Consulting Group Inc. 's 0. 82β — meaning HURN is approximately 13% more volatile than CRAI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CRA International, Inc. (CRAI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 36% versus 104% for Huron Consulting Group Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Huron Consulting Group Inc.

(HURN) is pulling ahead at 14. 3% versus 9. 3% for CRA International, Inc. (CRAI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CRA International, Inc. grew EPS 20. 8% year-over-year, compared to -6. 9% for Huron Consulting Group Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HURN leads at 14. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

CRA International, Inc.

(CRAI) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 3% net margin versus 6. 2% for Huron Consulting Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HURN leads at 11. 7% versus 11. 1% for CRAI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HURN leads at 29. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Huron Consulting Group Inc.

(HURN) trades at 13. 7x forward P/E versus 18. 5x for CRA International, Inc. — 4. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HURN: 66. 5% to $200. 00.

In this comparison, CRAI (1.

3% yield) pays a dividend. HURN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, CRA International, Inc.

(CRAI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 1. 3% yield, +619. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CRAI: +619. 1%, HURN: +108. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

CRAI pays a dividend while HURN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.