Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CRC vs SM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
CRC vs SM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $5.42B | $3.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.54B | $3.79B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-463M | $131M |
| Gross Margin | 37.2% | 45.1% |
| Operating Margin | 18.5% | 6.5% |
| Forward P/E | 12.1x | 4.4x |
| Total Debt | $1.36B | $2.30B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $132M | $368M |
CRC vs SM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| California Resource… (CRC) | 100 | 4595.5 | +4495.5% |
| SM Energy Company (SM) | 100 | 826.7 | +726.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CRC vs SM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CRC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 21.9%, EPS growth -10.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.4%
- 308.6% 10Y total return vs SM's 132.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.45, Low D/E 37.0%, current ratio 0.89x
SM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.16, yield 2.7%
- Beta 0.16, yield 2.7%, current ratio 0.69x
- Lower P/E (4.4x vs 12.1x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.9% revenue growth vs SM's 18.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.4x vs 12.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.4% margin vs CRC's -13.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.16 vs CRC's 0.45 | |
| Dividends | 2.7% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs CRC's 2.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +63.0% vs SM's +41.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.1% ROA vs CRC's -6.6%, ROIC 8.9% vs 13.8% |
CRC vs SM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CRC vs SM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SM and CRC operate at a comparable scale, with $3.8B and $3.5B in trailing revenue. SM is the more profitable business, keeping 3.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRC's -13.1%. On growth, SM holds the edge at +76.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.5B | $3.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.3B | $1.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$463M | $131M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $511M | -$226M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.2% | +45.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.5% | +6.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -13.1% | +3.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.4% | -5.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.7% | +76.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.4% | -2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
SM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.2x trailing earnings, SM trades at a 65% valuation discount to CRC's 14.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SM's 2.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CRC's 4.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.4B | $3.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.7B | $5.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.73x | 5.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.06x | 4.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.50x | 2.60x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.50x | 1.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.45x | 0.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.99x | 5.84x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CRC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SM delivers a 2.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-14 for CRC. CRC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SM's 0.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SM scores 7/9 vs CRC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -13.8% | +2.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.6% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.8% | +8.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.6% | +10.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.37x | 0.48x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.2B | $1.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $132M | $368M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.4B | $2.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.39x | 1.37x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CRC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CRC five years ago would be worth $26,718 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,892 for SM. Over the past 12 months, CRC leads with a +63.0% total return vs SM's +41.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CRC at 18.1% vs SM's 5.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +32.6% | +53.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +63.0% | +41.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +64.6% | +18.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +167.2% | +78.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +308.6% | +132.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.1% | +5.9% |
Risk & Volatility
SM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SM is the less volatile stock with a 0.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CRC's 0.45 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.45x | 0.16x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $71.98 | $33.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.93 | $17.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.9% | +87.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.6 | 47.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 987K | 5.9M |
Analyst Outlook
SM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CRC as "Buy" and SM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 11.8% upside for CRC (target: $68) vs -0.3% for SM (target: $29). For income investors, SM offers the higher dividend yield at 2.75% vs CRC's 2.55%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $68.33 | $29.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 54 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.5% | +2.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.56 | $0.80 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.0% | +0.4% |
SM leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CRC leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns).
CRC vs SM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CRC or SM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, California Resources Corporation (CRC) is the stronger pick with 21.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 18. 1% for SM Energy Company (SM). SM Energy Company (SM) offers the better valuation at 5. 2x trailing P/E (4. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate California Resources Corporation (CRC) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CRC or SM?
On trailing P/E, SM Energy Company (SM) is the cheapest at 5.
2x versus California Resources Corporation at 14. 7x. On forward P/E, SM Energy Company is actually cheaper at 4. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CRC or SM?
Over the past 5 years, California Resources Corporation (CRC) delivered a total return of +167.
2%, compared to +78. 9% for SM Energy Company (SM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CRC returned +308. 6% versus SM's +132. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CRC or SM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SM Energy Company (SM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
16β versus California Resources Corporation's 0. 45β — meaning CRC is approximately 171% more volatile than SM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, California Resources Corporation (CRC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 48% for SM Energy Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CRC or SM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), California Resources Corporation (CRC) is pulling ahead at 21.
9% versus 18. 1% for SM Energy Company (SM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: California Resources Corporation grew EPS -10. 2% year-over-year, compared to -15. 4% for SM Energy Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, CRC leads at 3. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CRC or SM?
SM Energy Company (SM) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
5% net margin versus 10. 1% for California Resources Corporation — meaning it keeps 20. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SM leads at 26. 1% versus 23. 6% for CRC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CRC leads at 39. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CRC or SM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, SM Energy Company (SM) trades at 4.
4x forward P/E versus 12. 1x for California Resources Corporation — 7. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CRC: 11. 8% to $68. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — CRC or SM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
SM Energy Company (SM) offers the highest yield at 2. 7%, versus 2. 5% for California Resources Corporation (CRC).
09Is CRC or SM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SM Energy Company (SM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
16), 2. 7% yield, +132. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SM: +132. 6%, CRC: +308. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CRC and SM?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.