Conglomerates
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CRESW vs IRS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Conglomerates
CRESW vs IRS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Conglomerates | Conglomerates |
| Market Cap | $20M | $1.16B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $857.48B | $502.69B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $104.60B | $374.35B |
| Gross Margin | 39.1% | 61.2% |
| Operating Margin | 8.6% | 101.4% |
| Forward P/E | 0.3x | 0.0x |
| Total Debt | $1.46T | $455.48B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $250.85B | $36.66B |
CRESW vs IRS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cresud S.A. Warrant… (CRESW) | 100 | 9.9 | -90.1% |
| IRSA Inversiones y … (IRS) | 100 | 410.8 | +310.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CRESW vs IRS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CRESW is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.85, yield 100.0%
- Rev growth 28.5%, EPS growth 29.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.0%
- Beta 2.85, yield 100.0%, current ratio 1.24x
IRS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 44.4% 10Y total return vs CRESW's -96.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.30, Low D/E 36.8%, current ratio 0.71x
- PEG 0.00 vs CRESW's 0.00
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 28.5% revenue growth vs IRS's 7.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 0.3x), PEG 0.00 vs 0.00 | |
| Quality / Margins | 74.5% margin vs CRESW's 12.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.30 vs CRESW's 2.85, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, vs IRS's 6.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +16.2% vs CRESW's -96.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.2% ROA vs CRESW's 2.1%, ROIC 1.5% vs 3.9% |
CRESW vs IRS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IRS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRESW is the larger business by revenue, generating $857.5B annually — 1.7x IRS's $502.7B. IRS is the more profitable business, keeping 74.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRESW's 12.2%. On growth, IRS holds the edge at +0.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $857.5B | $502.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $89.0B | $520.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $104.6B | $374.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $103.9B | $289.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.1% | +61.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.6% | +101.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.2% | +74.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.1% | +57.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -12.9% | +0.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +43.8% | -4.8% |
Valuation Metrics
CRESW leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.3x trailing earnings, CRESW trades at a 74% valuation discount to IRS's 1.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CRESW offers better value at 0.00x vs IRS's 0.01x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $20M | $1.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $892M | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.29x | 1.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 0.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.00x | 0.01x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.43x | 48.31x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.03x | 3.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.01x | 1.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.50x | 5.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IRS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IRS delivers a 25.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $26 in annual profit, vs $5 for CRESW. IRS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CRESW's 0.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CRESW scores 6/9 vs IRS's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.7% | +25.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.1% | +12.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.9% | +1.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.4% | +1.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.66x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.21T | $418.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $250.9B | $36.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.46T | $455.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.40x | 10.01x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IRS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IRS five years ago would be worth $48,562 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $342 for CRESW. Over the past 12 months, IRS leads with a +16.2% total return vs CRESW's -96.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IRS at 48.1% vs CRESW's -53.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -97.5% | -9.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -96.2% | +16.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.7% | +224.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.6% | +385.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.6% | +44.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -53.2% | +48.1% |
Risk & Volatility
IRS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IRS is the less volatile stock with a 1.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CRESW's 2.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IRS currently trades 78.5% from its 52-week high vs CRESW's 2.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.85x | 1.30x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.53 | $19.14 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.00 | $10.87 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +2.0% | +78.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 19.0 | 43.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 63K | 185K |
Analyst Outlook
CRESW leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, CRESW offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs IRS's 5.99%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $13.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | +6.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $132.05 | $1253.80 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +58.0% | +1.4% |
IRS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CRESW leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
CRESW vs IRS: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CRESW or IRS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cresud S.
A. Warrant 2021-08. 03. 26 on Cresud (CRESW) is the stronger pick with 28. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 1% for IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima (IRS). Cresud S. A. Warrant 2021-08. 03. 26 on Cresud (CRESW) offers the better valuation at 0. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima (IRS) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CRESW or IRS?
On trailing P/E, Cresud S.
A. Warrant 2021-08. 03. 26 on Cresud (CRESW) is the cheapest at 0. 3x versus IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima at 1. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CRESW or IRS?
Over the past 5 years, IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima (IRS) delivered a total return of +385.
6%, compared to -96. 6% for Cresud S. A. Warrant 2021-08. 03. 26 on Cresud (CRESW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IRS returned +44. 4% versus CRESW's -96. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CRESW or IRS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima (IRS) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
30β versus Cresud S. A. Warrant 2021-08. 03. 26 on Cresud's 2. 85β — meaning CRESW is approximately 120% more volatile than IRS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima (IRS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 66% for Cresud S. A. Warrant 2021-08. 03. 26 on Cresud — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CRESW or IRS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cresud S.
A. Warrant 2021-08. 03. 26 on Cresud (CRESW) is pulling ahead at 28. 5% versus 7. 1% for IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima (IRS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima grew EPS 48. 2% year-over-year, compared to 29. 9% for Cresud S. A. Warrant 2021-08. 03. 26 on Cresud. Over a 3-year CAGR, IRS leads at 24. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CRESW or IRS?
IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima (IRS) is the more profitable company, earning 22.
3% net margin versus 10. 5% for Cresud S. A. Warrant 2021-08. 03. 26 on Cresud — meaning it keeps 22. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CRESW leads at 16. 5% versus 6. 6% for IRS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IRS leads at 60. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — CRESW or IRS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Cresud S. A. Warrant 2021-08. 03. 26 on Cresud (CRESW) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 6. 0% for IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima (IRS).
08Is CRESW or IRS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima (IRS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
30), 6. 0% yield). Cresud S. A. Warrant 2021-08. 03. 26 on Cresud (CRESW) carries a higher beta of 2. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IRS: +44. 4%, CRESW: -96. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CRESW and IRS?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CRESW is a small-cap high-growth stock; IRS is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.