Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CRL vs MEDP

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CRL
Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$8.97B
5Y Perf.+1.2%
MEDP
Medpace Holdings, Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$12.19B
5Y Perf.+359.8%

CRL vs MEDP — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CRL logoCRL
MEDP logoMEDP
IndustryMedical - Diagnostics & ResearchMedical - Diagnostics & Research
Market Cap$8.97B$12.19B
Revenue (TTM)$4.02B$2.68B
Net Income (TTM)$-144M$460M
Gross Margin32.9%29.1%
Operating Margin10.7%21.0%
Forward P/E16.4x25.1x
Total Debt$3.07B$250M
Cash & Equiv.$214M$497M

CRL vs MEDPLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CRL
MEDP
StockMay 20May 26Return
Charles River Labor… (CRL)100101.2+1.2%
Medpace Holdings, I… (MEDP)100459.8+359.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CRL vs MEDP

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MEDP leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CRL
Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.
The Value Play

CRL is the clearest fit if your priority is value and momentum.

  • Lower P/E (16.4x vs 25.1x)
  • +57.5% vs MEDP's +47.8%
Best for: value and momentum
MEDP
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
The Income Pick

MEDP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • beta 1.26
  • Rev growth 20.0%, EPS growth 21.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 20.1%
  • 14.4% 10Y total return vs CRL's 124.7%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMEDP logoMEDP20.0% revenue growth vs CRL's -0.9%
ValueCRL logoCRLLower P/E (16.4x vs 25.1x)
Quality / MarginsMEDP logoMEDP17.2% margin vs CRL's -3.6%
Stability / SafetyMEDP logoMEDPBeta 1.26 vs CRL's 1.52, lower leverage
DividendsTieNeither stock pays a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CRL logoCRL+57.5% vs MEDP's +47.8%
Efficiency (ROA)MEDP logoMEDP24.8% ROA vs CRL's -1.9%, ROIC 154.9% vs 6.3%

CRL vs MEDP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CRLCharles River Laboratories International, Inc.
FY 2025
Discovery and Safety Assessment
59.8%$2.4B
Research Models and Services
21.1%$846M
Manufacturing Support
19.1%$766M
MEDPMedpace Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Oncology
29.5%$748M
Metabolic
29.4%$745M
Other
16.1%$409M
Central Nervous System
10.1%$255M
Cardiology
9.5%$239M
Antiviral And Anti Infective
5.3%$135M

CRL vs MEDP — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMEDPLAGGINGCRL

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MEDP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

CRL and MEDP operate at a comparable scale, with $4.0B and $2.7B in trailing revenue. MEDP is the more profitable business, keeping 17.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRL's -3.6%. On growth, MEDP holds the edge at +26.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…MEDP logoMEDPMedpace Holdings,…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$4.0B$2.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$832M$577M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$144M$460M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$518M$745M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+32.9%+29.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+10.7%+21.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-3.6%+17.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+12.9%+27.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-0.8%+26.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-33.2%+16.6%
MEDP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CRL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, CRL's 13.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MEDP's 21.2x.

MetricCRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…MEDP logoMEDPMedpace Holdings,…
Market CapShares × price$9.0B$12.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$11.8B$11.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-62.45x27.93x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.16.40x25.13x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.88x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple12.97x21.21x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.23x4.82x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.81x27.45x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF17.29x17.87x
CRL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MEDP leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.

MEDP delivers a 120.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $121 in annual profit, vs $-4 for CRL. MEDP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.55x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CRL's 0.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MEDP scores 6/9 vs CRL's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricCRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…MEDP logoMEDPMedpace Holdings,…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-4.3%+120.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-1.9%+24.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.3%+154.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+8.1%+65.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–946
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.95x0.55x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$2.9B-$247M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$214M$497M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$3.1B$250M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense3.72x
MEDP leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

MEDP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MEDP five years ago would be worth $26,038 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,395 for CRL. Over the past 12 months, CRL leads with a +57.5% total return vs MEDP's +47.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MEDP at 26.8% vs CRL's -1.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…MEDP logoMEDPMedpace Holdings,…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-10.2%-25.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+57.5%+47.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-4.3%+103.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-46.0%+160.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+124.7%+1435.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-1.5%+26.8%
MEDP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CRL and MEDP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MEDP is the less volatile stock with a 1.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CRL's 1.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CRL currently trades 79.4% from its 52-week high vs MEDP's 67.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…MEDP logoMEDPMedpace Holdings,…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.52x1.26x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$228.88$628.92
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$113.89$284.10
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+79.4%+67.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10060.841.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded803K372K
Evenly matched — CRL and MEDP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates CRL as "Buy" and MEDP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 16.9% upside for MEDP (target: $499) vs 13.0% for CRL (target: $205).

MetricCRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…MEDP logoMEDPMedpace Holdings,…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$205.43$498.86
# AnalystsCovering analysts3619
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+4.0%+7.5%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

MEDP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CRL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallMedpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CRL vs MEDP: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CRL or MEDP a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Medpace Holdings, Inc.

(MEDP) is the stronger pick with 20. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP) offers the better valuation at 27. 9x trailing P/E (25. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CRL or MEDP?

On forward P/E, Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 16. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CRL or MEDP?

Over the past 5 years, Medpace Holdings, Inc.

(MEDP) delivered a total return of +160. 4%, compared to -46. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MEDP returned +1436% versus CRL's +124. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CRL or MEDP?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Medpace Holdings, Inc.

(MEDP) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 26β versus Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. 's 1. 52β — meaning CRL is approximately 21% more volatile than MEDP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 55% versus 95% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CRL or MEDP?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Medpace Holdings, Inc.

(MEDP) is pulling ahead at 20. 0% versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Medpace Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 21. 0% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MEDP leads at 20. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CRL or MEDP?

Medpace Holdings, Inc.

(MEDP) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 8% net margin versus -3. 6% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MEDP leads at 21. 1% versus 12. 6% for CRL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CRL leads at 30. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CRL or MEDP more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.

(CRL) trades at 16. 4x forward P/E versus 25. 1x for Medpace Holdings, Inc. — 8. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MEDP: 16. 9% to $498. 86.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CRL or MEDP?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is CRL or MEDP better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Medpace Holdings, Inc.

(MEDP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 26), +1436% 10Y return). Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL) carries a higher beta of 1. 52 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MEDP: +1436%, CRL: +124. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CRL and MEDP?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MEDP is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

CRL

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 19%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MEDP

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 13%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CRL and MEDP on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CRL: -0.8% · MEDP: 26.5%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.