Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CSGP vs Z
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
CSGP vs Z — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $14.79B | $10.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.41B | $2.48B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $25M | $-32M |
| Gross Margin | 77.4% | 74.9% |
| Operating Margin | -0.8% | -3.7% |
| Forward P/E | 25.8x | 19.7x |
| Total Debt | $1.14B | $93M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.73B | $768M |
CSGP vs Z — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) | 100 | 53.1 | -46.9% |
| Zillow Group, Inc. … (Z) | 100 | 75.1 | -24.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CSGP vs Z
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CSGP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.80
- Rev growth 18.7%, EPS growth -95.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.2%
- 80.5% 10Y total return vs Z's 62.9%
Z is the clearest fit if your priority is value and momentum.
- Lower P/E (19.7x vs 25.8x)
- -36.1% vs CSGP's -54.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.7% FFO/revenue growth vs Z's 15.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.7x vs 25.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.7% margin vs Z's -1.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.80 vs Z's 1.32 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -36.1% vs CSGP's -54.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.2% ROA vs Z's -0.6%, ROIC -0.9% vs -0.6% |
CSGP vs Z — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CSGP vs Z — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CSGP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CSGP and Z operate at a comparable scale, with $3.4B and $2.5B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 0.7% (CSGP) to -1.3% (Z). On growth, CSGP holds the edge at +22.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.4B | $2.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $278M | $187M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $25M | -$32M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $241M | $264M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +77.4% | +74.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.8% | -3.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.7% | -1.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | +10.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +22.5% | +16.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +127.7% | +145.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Z leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 483.8x trailing earnings, Z trades at a 77% valuation discount to CSGP's 2102.4x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14.8B | $10.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $14.2B | $9.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2102.41x | 483.78x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.78x | 19.65x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 83.54x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.56x | 4.05x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.76x | 2.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 360.77x | 44.55x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Z leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CSGP delivers a 0.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $0 in annual profit, vs $-1 for Z. Z carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CSGP's 0.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), Z scores 7/9 vs CSGP's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.3% | -0.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.2% | -0.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.9% | -0.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.8% | -0.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.14x | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$589M | -$675M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.7B | $768M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.1B | $93M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.58x | -0.38x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Z leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CSGP five years ago would be worth $4,185 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,826 for Z. Over the past 12 months, Z leads with a -36.1% total return vs CSGP's -54.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors Z at -3.7% vs CSGP's -22.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -46.9% | -34.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -54.7% | -36.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.2% | -10.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.2% | -61.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +80.5% | +62.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -22.4% | -3.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CSGP and Z each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CSGP is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than Z's 1.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. Z currently trades 46.4% from its 52-week high vs CSGP's 35.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.80x | 1.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $97.43 | $93.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.31 | $39.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +35.8% | +46.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 34.6 | 49.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.0M | 3.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CSGP as "Buy" and Z as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 83.7% upside for Z (target: $80) vs 77.4% for CSGP (target: $62).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $61.91 | $80.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 25 | 46 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.9% | +6.4% |
Z leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CSGP leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
CSGP vs Z: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CSGP or Z a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CoStar Group, Inc.
(CSGP) is the stronger pick with 18. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 15. 5% for Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (Z). Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (Z) offers the better valuation at 483. 8x trailing P/E (19. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CSGP or Z?
On trailing P/E, Zillow Group, Inc.
Class C (Z) is the cheapest at 483. 8x versus CoStar Group, Inc. at 2102. 4x. On forward P/E, Zillow Group, Inc. Class C is actually cheaper at 19. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CSGP or Z?
Over the past 5 years, CoStar Group, Inc.
(CSGP) delivered a total return of -58. 2%, compared to -61. 7% for Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (Z). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CSGP returned +80. 5% versus Z's +62. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CSGP or Z?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CoStar Group, Inc.
(CSGP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 80β versus Zillow Group, Inc. Class C's 1. 32β — meaning Z is approximately 65% more volatile than CSGP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (Z) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 14% for CoStar Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CSGP or Z?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CoStar Group, Inc.
(CSGP) is pulling ahead at 18. 7% versus 15. 5% for Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (Z). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Zillow Group, Inc. Class C grew EPS 118. 8% year-over-year, compared to -95. 1% for CoStar Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CSGP leads at 14. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CSGP or Z?
Zillow Group, Inc.
Class C (Z) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 9% net margin versus 0. 2% for CoStar Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: Z leads at -1. 3% versus -2. 2% for CSGP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CSGP leads at 75. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CSGP or Z more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Zillow Group, Inc.
Class C (Z) trades at 19. 7x forward P/E versus 25. 8x for CoStar Group, Inc. — 6. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for Z: 83. 7% to $80. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CSGP or Z?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is CSGP or Z better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CoStar Group, Inc.
(CSGP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 80)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CSGP: +80. 5%, Z: +62. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CSGP and Z?
These companies operate in different sectors (CSGP (Real Estate) and Z (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 8%
- Gross Margin > 44%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.