CTDD
Qwest Corp. 6.75% NT 57
Telecommunications Services
Market Cap$19.00
5Y Perf.-20.9%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
CTDD vs LUMN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
LUMN
Lumen Technologies, Inc.
Telecommunications Services
Market Cap$8.71B
5Y Perf.-13.9%
CTDD vs LUMN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | CTDD | LUMN |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $19.00 | $8.71B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.95B | $12.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.13B | $-1.74B |
| Gross Margin | 37.5% | 35.2% |
| Operating Margin | 31.0% | -2.6% |
| Total Debt | $1.99B | $17.71B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $26M | $1.00B |
CTDD vs LUMN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
CTDD
LUMN
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwest Corp. 6.75% N… (CTDD) | 100 | 79.1 | -20.9% |
| Lumen Technologies,… (LUMN) | 100 | 86.1 | -13.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CTDD vs LUMN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: CTDD and LUMN are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Lumen Technologies, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CTDD
Qwest Corp. 6.75% NT 57
The Income Pick
CTDD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.74
- 37.9% 10Y total return vs LUMN's -35.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.74, Low D/E 16.3%, current ratio 1.35x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
LUMN
Lumen Technologies, Inc.
The Growth Play
LUMN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth -5.4%, EPS growth -30.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -10.8%
- -5.4% revenue growth vs CTDD's -6.9%
- 0.0% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | LUMN | -5.4% revenue growth vs CTDD's -6.9% |
| Quality / Margins | CTDD | 22.8% margin vs LUMN's -14.3% |
| Stability / Safety | CTDD | Beta 0.74 vs LUMN's 2.74 |
| Dividends | LUMN | 0.0% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | LUMN | +100.0% vs CTDD's +22.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CTDD | 6.3% ROA vs LUMN's -5.3%, ROIC 11.3% vs -0.8% |
CTDD vs LUMN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2025
CTDD vs LUMN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCTDDLAGGINGLUMN
LUMNLumen Technologies, I…
1leads
CTDDQwest Corp. 6.75% NT …
5leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs LUMNMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
CTDD3/5
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
CTDD3/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
CTDD8/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
LUMN4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
CTDD2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
CTDD1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CTDD leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LUMN is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.1B annually — 2.4x CTDD's $5.0B. CTDD is the more profitable business, keeping 22.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LUMN's -14.3%. On growth, LUMN holds the edge at -8.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CTDDQwest Corp. 6.75%… | LUMNLumen Technologie… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.0B | $12.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.3B | $2.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.1B | -$1.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $261M | $5.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.5% | +35.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +31.0% | -2.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +22.8% | -14.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.3% | +44.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -14.8% | -8.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | 0.0% |
CTDD leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
CTDD leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CTDD's 0.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LUMN's 9.9x.
| Metric | CTDDQwest Corp. 6.75%… | LUMNLumen Technologie… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $19 | $8.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.0B | $25.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | -4.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 0.70x | 9.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | 0.70x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.00x | 23.49x |
CTDD leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CTDD leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CTDD delivers a 8.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-79 for LUMN. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CTDD scores 7/9 vs LUMN's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | CTDDQwest Corp. 6.75%… | LUMNLumen Technologie… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.7% | -79.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.3% | -5.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.3% | -0.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.9% | -0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.16x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.0B | $16.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $26M | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.0B | $17.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 33.08x | -1.12x |
CTDD leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LUMN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CTDD five years ago would be worth $10,536 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,119 for LUMN. Over the past 12 months, LUMN leads with a +100.0% total return vs CTDD's +22.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LUMN at 54.4% vs CTDD's 24.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CTDDQwest Corp. 6.75%… | LUMNLumen Technologie… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.6% | +10.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.3% | +100.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +94.5% | +267.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.4% | -28.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +37.9% | -35.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +24.8% | +54.4% |
LUMN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CTDD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CTDD is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LUMN's 2.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CTDD currently trades 90.7% from its 52-week high vs LUMN's 70.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CTDDQwest Corp. 6.75%… | LUMNLumen Technologie… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.74x | 2.74x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.40 | $11.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.48 | $3.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.7% | +70.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.5 | 73.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 63K | 12.5M |
CTDD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
CTDD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | CTDDQwest Corp. 6.75%… | LUMNLumen Technologie… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $7.08 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CTDD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
CTDD leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). LUMN leads in 1 (Total Returns).
Best OverallQwest Corp. 6.75% NT 57 (CTDD)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
CTDD vs LUMN: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CTDD or LUMN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Lumen Technologies, Inc.
(LUMN) is the stronger pick with -5. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 9% for Qwest Corp. 6. 75% NT 57 (CTDD). Analysts rate Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN) a "Hold" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CTDD or LUMN?
Over the past 5 years, Qwest Corp.
6. 75% NT 57 (CTDD) delivered a total return of +5. 4%, compared to -28. 8% for Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CTDD returned +37. 9% versus LUMN's -35. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CTDD or LUMN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Qwest Corp.
6. 75% NT 57 (CTDD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus Lumen Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 74β — meaning LUMN is approximately 270% more volatile than CTDD relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — CTDD or LUMN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lumen Technologies, Inc.
(LUMN) is pulling ahead at -5. 4% versus -6. 9% for Qwest Corp. 6. 75% NT 57 (CTDD). Over a 3-year CAGR, CTDD leads at -7. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CTDD or LUMN?
Qwest Corp.
6. 75% NT 57 (CTDD) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 0% net margin versus -14. 0% for Lumen Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CTDD leads at 37. 2% versus -1. 5% for LUMN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CTDD leads at 73. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CTDD or LUMN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is CTDD or LUMN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Qwest Corp.
6. 75% NT 57 (CTDD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74)). Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN) carries a higher beta of 2. 74 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CTDD: +37. 9%, LUMN: -35. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CTDD and LUMN?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(CTDD: -14.8% · LUMN: -8.9%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.