Comprehensive Stock Comparison

Compare CubeSmart (CUBE) vs Public Storage (PSA) Stock

Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.

Tickers 2 / 10100+ Metrics

Selected Stocks

Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Quick Verdict

CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthPSA2.7% revenue growth vs CUBE's 1.5%
ValueCUBELower P/E (28.7x vs 30.5x), PEG 0.92 vs 4.10
Quality / MarginsPSA39.5% net margin vs CUBE's 32.2%
Stability / SafetyPSABeta 0.45 vs CUBE's 0.53
DividendsCUBE4.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; PSA pays no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)PSA+5.1% vs CUBE's +4.7%
Efficiency (ROA)PSA9.4% ROA vs CUBE's 5.3%, ROIC 13.5% vs 6.1%
Bottom line: PSA leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the stronger pick for investors who prioritize growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. CubeSmart is the better choice for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. As direct sector peers, they can serve as alternatives in the same portfolio allocation.

Who Each Stock Is For

Income & stability

Growth exposure

Long-term compounding (10Y)

Sleep-well-at-night portfolio

Valuation efficiency (growth/$)

Defensive / Recession hedge

Business Model

What each company does and how it makes money

CUBECubeSmart
Real Estate

CubeSmart is a real estate investment trust that owns and operates self-storage facilities across the United States. It generates revenue primarily through rental income from storage units—with additional income from tenant insurance, truck rentals, and packing supplies—with property operations contributing over 90% of total revenue. The company's competitive advantage lies in its national brand recognition, technology-enabled customer experience, and strategic locations in high-demand metropolitan areas.

PSAPublic Storage
Real Estate

Public Storage is a real estate investment trust that owns and operates self-storage facilities across the United States and Europe. It generates revenue primarily through rental income from storage units — with additional income from tenant insurance, truck rentals, and property management services — making it one of the largest self-storage operators globally. The company's competitive advantage lies in its massive scale, prime locations, and strong brand recognition that creates pricing power and operational efficiency.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CUBECubeSmart
FY 2024
Other Property Related Income
73.3%$114M
Property Management Fee Income
26.7%$41M
PSAPublic Storage
FY 2024
Self Storage Operations
93.6%$4.4B
Ancillary Operations
6.4%$300M

Financial Metrics Comparison

Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging

Financial Scorecard

PSA 4CUBE 2
Financial MetricsPSA5/6 metrics
Valuation MetricsCUBE6/7 metrics
Profitability & EfficiencyPSA4/7 metrics
Total ReturnsPSA5/6 metrics
Risk & VolatilityPSA2/2 metrics
Analyst OutlookCUBE1/1 metrics

PSA leads in 4 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CUBE leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).

Financial Metrics (TTM)

PSA is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.8B annually — 4.3x CUBE's $1.1B. PSA is the more profitable business, keeping 39.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CUBE's 32.2%.

MetricCUBECubeSmartPSAPublic Storage
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.1B$4.8B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$711M$3.7B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$357M$1.9B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$651M$3.1B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+63.4%+73.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+41.7%+53.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+32.2%+39.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+58.8%+65.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+5.2%+3.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-18.2%+21.3%
PSA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

At 23.9x trailing earnings, CUBE trades at a 30% valuation discount to PSA's 34.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CUBE offers better value at 0.76x vs PSA's 4.57x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricCUBECubeSmartPSAPublic Storage
Market CapShares × price$9.4B$53.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$12.4B$63.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS23.92x34.08x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.28.70x30.53x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.76x4.57x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple17.95x14.00x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue8.80x11.17x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.16x5.78x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF14.87x16.91x
CUBE leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

PSA delivers a 20.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $13 for CUBE. CUBE carries lower financial leverage with a 1.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PSA's 1.10x.

MetricCUBECubeSmartPSAPublic Storage
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+12.5%+20.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+5.3%+9.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.1%+13.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+8.1%+17.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–955
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.03x1.10x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$3.0B$9.9B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$72M$318M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$3.1B$10.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense11.19x
PSA leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (with DRIP)

A $10,000 investment in PSA five years ago would be worth $16,046 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,844 for CUBE. Over the past 12 months, PSA leads with a +5.1% total return vs CUBE's +4.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PSA at 4.7% vs CUBE's 0.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCUBECubeSmartPSAPublic Storage
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+17.7%+18.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+4.7%+5.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+0.6%+14.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+38.4%+60.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+88.4%+64.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+0.2%+4.7%
PSA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

PSA is the less volatile stock with a 0.45 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CUBE's 0.53 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricCUBECubeSmartPSAPublic Storage
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.53x0.45x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$44.13$322.49
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$34.24$256.54
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+93.2%+95.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10063.964.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.0M959K
PSA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Wall Street rates CUBE as "Hold" and PSA as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 1.5% upside for CUBE (target: $42) vs -1.9% for PSA (target: $301). CUBE is the only dividend payer here at 4.94% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricCUBECubeSmartPSAPublic Storage
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$41.75$301.22
# AnalystsCovering analysts2936
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+4.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises150
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.03
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%
CUBE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Historical Charts

Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.

Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)

StockMar 20Feb 26Change
CubeSmart (CUBE)100116.58+16.6%
Public Storage (PSA)100123.97+24.0%

Public Storage (PSA) returned +60% over 5 years vs CubeSmart (CUBE)'s +38%. A $10,000 investment in PSA 5 years ago would be worth $16,046 today (including dividends reinvested).

Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years

Stock20162025Change
CubeSmart (CUBE)$510M$1.1B+109.0%
Public Storage (PSA)$2.6B$4.8B+88.4%

Public Storage's revenue grew from $2.6B (2016) to $4.8B (2025) — a 7.3% CAGR.

Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years

Stock20162025Change
CubeSmart (CUBE)17.2%36.7%+112.9%
Public Storage (PSA)56.8%37.3%-34.4%

Public Storage's net margin went from 57% (2016) to 37% (2025).

Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years

Stock20172025Change
CubeSmart (CUBE)39.124.9-36.3%
Public Storage (PSA)31.128.8-7.4%

CubeSmart has traded in a 25x–72x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~24x. Public Storage has traded in a 12x–38x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~34x.

Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years

Stock20162025Change
CubeSmart (CUBE)0.451.72+282.2%
Public Storage (PSA)6.819.01+32.3%

Public Storage's EPS grew from $6.81 (2016) to $9.01 (2025) — a 3% CAGR.

Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years

2021
$449M
$2B
2022
$591M
$3B
2023
$611M
$3B
2024
$631M
$3B
2025
$3B
CubeSmart (CUBE)Public Storage (PSA)

CubeSmart generated $631M FCF in 2024 (+40% vs 2021). Public Storage generated $3B FCF in 2025 (+40% vs 2021).

Loading custom metrics...

CUBE vs PSA: Frequently Asked Questions

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CUBE or PSA a better buy right now?

CubeSmart (CUBE) offers the better valuation at 23.9x trailing P/E (28.7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CubeSmart (CUBE) a "Hold" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CUBE or PSA?

On trailing P/E, CubeSmart (CUBE) is the cheapest at 23.9x versus Public Storage at 34.1x. On forward P/E, CubeSmart is actually cheaper at 28.7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: CubeSmart wins at 0.92x versus Public Storage's 4.10x — a PEG below 1.0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CUBE or PSA?

Over the past 5 years, Public Storage (PSA) delivered a total return of +60.5%, compared to +38.4% for CubeSmart (CUBE). A $10,000 investment in PSA five years ago would be worth approximately $16K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CUBE returned +88.4% versus PSA's +64.9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CUBE or PSA?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Public Storage (PSA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.45β versus CubeSmart's 0.53β — meaning CUBE is approximately 17% more volatile than PSA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CubeSmart (CUBE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 103% versus 110% for Public Storage — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which has better profit margins — CUBE or PSA?

Public Storage (PSA) is the more profitable company, earning 37.3% net margin versus 36.7% for CubeSmart — meaning it keeps 37.3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PSA leads at 70.6% versus 45.3% for CUBE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PSA leads at 72.8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is CUBE or PSA more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential. By this metric, CubeSmart (CUBE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0.92x versus Public Storage's 4.10x. A PEG below 1.0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, CubeSmart (CUBE) trades at 28.7x forward P/E versus 30.5x for Public Storage — 1.8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CUBE: 1.5% to $41.75.

07

Which pays a better dividend — CUBE or PSA?

In this comparison, CUBE (4.9% yield) pays a dividend. PSA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is CUBE or PSA better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, CubeSmart (CUBE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.53), 4.9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CUBE: +88.4%, PSA: +64.9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between CUBE and PSA?

Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: CUBE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PSA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. CUBE pays a dividend while PSA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.

🛡️
Stocks Like

CUBE

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 19%
Run This Screen
💎
Stocks Like

PSA

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 23%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Better Than Both

Find stocks that beat CUBE and PSA on the metrics you choose

Revenue Growth>
%
(CUBE: 5.2% · PSA: 3.1%)
Net Margin>
%
(CUBE: 32.2% · PSA: 39.5%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(CUBE: 23.9x · PSA: 34.1x)