CUBWU
Lionheart Holdings Unit
Shell Companies
Market Cap$82M
5Y Perf.+7.6%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
CUBWU vs GS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
Financial - Capital Markets
Market Cap$287.62B
5Y Perf.+104.2%
CUBWU vs GS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | CUBWU | GS |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $82M | $287.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $126.85B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $9M | $16.67B |
| Gross Margin | — | 41.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 14.5% |
| Forward P/E | 43.0x | 15.6x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $616.93B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $891K | $182.09B |
CUBWU vs GS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
CUBWU
GS
| Stock | Jun 24 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lionheart Holdings … (CUBWU) | 100 | 107.6 | +7.6% |
| The Goldman Sachs G… (GS) | 100 | 204.2 | +104.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CUBWU vs GS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: GS leads in 3 of 5 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. Lionheart Holdings Unit is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and operational efficiency and capital deployment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CUBWU
Lionheart Holdings Unit
The Banking Pick
CUBWU is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.09
- Lower volatility, beta 0.09, current ratio 12.25x
- Beta 0.09, current ratio 12.25x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
The Banking Pick
GS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 5.3% 10Y total return vs CUBWU's 7.5%
- Lower P/E (15.6x vs 43.0x)
- 1.5% yield; 12-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Value | GS | Lower P/E (15.6x vs 43.0x) |
| Stability / Safety | CUBWU | Beta 0.09 vs GS's 1.47 |
| Dividends | GS | 1.5% yield; 12-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | GS | +70.6% vs CUBWU's +2.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CUBWU | 3.9% ROA vs GS's 0.9% |
CUBWU vs GS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2024
CUBWU vs GS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLGSLAGGINGCUBWU
CUBWULionheart Holdings Un…
1leads
GSThe Goldman Sachs Gro…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs CUBWUMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
GS1/1
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
CUBWU2/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
Tied
—
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
GS6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GS and CUBWU operate at a comparable scale, with $126.9B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | CUBWULionheart Holding… | GSThe Goldman Sachs… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $126.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $7M | $23.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $9M | $16.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$589,072 | $15.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +41.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +14.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +11.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -12.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -28.6% | +45.8% |
GS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
CUBWU leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.8x trailing earnings, GS trades at a 47% valuation discount to CUBWU's 43.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CUBWU's 14.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GS's 34.8x.
| Metric | CUBWULionheart Holding… | GSThe Goldman Sachs… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $82M | $287.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $82M | $722.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 43.00x | 22.84x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.64x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.63x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.96x | 34.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 2.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.09x | 2.53x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
CUBWU leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — CUBWU and GS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GS delivers a 12.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $4 for CUBWU. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GS scores 4/9 vs CUBWU's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | CUBWULionheart Holding… | GSThe Goldman Sachs… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.0% | +12.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.9% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +1.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.2% | +3.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 5.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$891,017 | $434.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $891,017 | $182.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $616.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.31x |
Evenly matched — CUBWU and GS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GS five years ago would be worth $26,440 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,750 for CUBWU. Over the past 12 months, GS leads with a +70.6% total return vs CUBWU's +2.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GS at 43.5% vs CUBWU's 2.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CUBWULionheart Holding… | GSThe Goldman Sachs… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.0% | +1.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +2.7% | +70.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.5% | +195.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.5% | +164.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.5% | +534.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.4% | +43.5% |
GS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CUBWU and GS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CUBWU is the less volatile stock with a 0.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GS's 1.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GS currently trades 94.0% from its 52-week high vs CUBWU's 83.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CUBWULionheart Holding… | GSThe Goldman Sachs… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.09x | 1.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.90 | $984.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.47 | $547.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.3% | +94.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.4 | 59.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 103 | 2.0M |
Evenly matched — CUBWU and GS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
GS is the only dividend payer here at 1.46% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | CUBWULionheart Holding… | GSThe Goldman Sachs… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $995.89 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 55 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $13.48 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.5% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
GS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). CUBWU leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallThe Goldman Sachs Group, In… (GS)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
CUBWU vs GS: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CUBWU or GS a better buy right now?
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
(GS) offers the better valuation at 22. 8x trailing P/E (15. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) a "Hold" — based on 55 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CUBWU or GS?
On trailing P/E, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
(GS) is the cheapest at 22. 8x versus Lionheart Holdings Unit at 43. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CUBWU or GS?
Over the past 5 years, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
(GS) delivered a total return of +164. 4%, compared to +7. 5% for Lionheart Holdings Unit (CUBWU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GS returned +534. 3% versus CUBWU's +7. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CUBWU or GS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lionheart Holdings Unit (CUBWU) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
09β versus The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. 's 1. 47β — meaning GS is approximately 1561% more volatile than CUBWU relative to the S&P 500.
05Which has better profit margins — CUBWU or GS?
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
(GS) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 3% net margin versus 0. 0% for Lionheart Holdings Unit — meaning it keeps 11. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GS leads at 14. 5% versus 0. 0% for CUBWU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GS leads at 41. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CUBWU or GS?
In this comparison, GS (1.
5% yield) pays a dividend. CUBWU does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is CUBWU or GS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lionheart Holdings Unit (CUBWU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
09)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CUBWU: +7. 5%, GS: +534. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CUBWU and GS?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CUBWU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GS is a large-cap high-growth stock. GS pays a dividend while CUBWU does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
P/E Ratio<
x
(CUBWU: 43.0x · GS: 22.8x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.