Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
CVI vs DKL vs DK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
CVI vs DKL vs DK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing |
| Market Cap | $3.28B | $2.71B | $2.74B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.50B | $1.06B | $10.73B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-42M | $170M | $-51M |
| Gross Margin | 1.4% | 19.2% | 6.6% |
| Operating Margin | -0.6% | 16.5% | 3.3% |
| Forward P/E | 35.3x | 13.8x | 11.8x |
| Total Debt | $1.83B | $35M | $3.35B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $511M | $11M | $626M |
CVI vs DKL vs DK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVR Energy, Inc. (CVI) | 100 | 201.9 | +101.9% |
| Delek Logistics Par… (DKL) | 100 | 214.3 | +114.3% |
| Delek US Holdings, … (DK) | 100 | 227.2 | +127.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CVI vs DKL vs DK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CVI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.11, current ratio 1.79x
- Beta 0.11, current ratio 1.79x
- Beta 0.11 vs DKL's 0.35, lower leverage
DKL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.35, yield 8.7%
- Rev growth 7.7%, EPS growth 10.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.7%
- 7.7% revenue growth vs DK's -9.5%
DK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 265.7% 10Y total return vs CVI's 253.4%
- Lower P/E (11.8x vs 13.8x)
- +227.4% vs DKL's +45.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.7% revenue growth vs DK's -9.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.8x vs 13.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.0% margin vs CVI's -0.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.11 vs DKL's 0.35, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 8.7% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs DK's 2.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +227.4% vs DKL's +45.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.1% ROA vs CVI's -1.1%, ROIC 14.1% vs 6.2% |
CVI vs DKL vs DK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CVI vs DKL vs DK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DKL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DK is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.7B annually — 10.1x DKL's $1.1B. DKL is the more profitable business, keeping 16.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CVI's -0.6%. On growth, CVI holds the edge at +20.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.5B | $1.1B | $10.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $370M | $310M | $754M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$42M | $170M | -$51M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $69M | $112M | $479M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | +19.2% | +6.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.6% | +16.5% | +3.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.6% | +16.0% | -0.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.9% | +10.6% | +4.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.3% | +19.0% | +0.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -56.6% | -17.8% | -20.1% |
Valuation Metrics
DK leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.5x trailing earnings, DKL trades at a 87% valuation discount to CVI's 120.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, DK's 6.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DKL's 8.8x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.3B | $2.7B | $2.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.6B | $2.7B | $5.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 120.74x | 15.46x | -117.61x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 35.30x | 13.82x | 11.83x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.07x | 8.81x | 6.89x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.46x | 2.68x | 0.26x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.65x | 446.88x | 4.96x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 124.50x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DKL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DKL delivers a 19.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-13 for DK. CVI carries lower financial leverage with a 2.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DK's 6.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CVI scores 8/9 vs DKL's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.0% | +19.2% | -12.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.1% | +6.1% | -0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.2% | +14.1% | +9.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.3% | +8.3% | +9.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.04x | 5.75x | 6.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.3B | $24M | $2.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $511M | $11M | $626M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.8B | $35M | $3.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.41x | 1.66x | 1.19x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CVI five years ago would be worth $24,700 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $18,598 for DKL. Over the past 12 months, DK leads with a +227.4% total return vs DKL's +45.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DK at 30.8% vs DKL's 13.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +30.9% | +13.4% | +51.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +59.8% | +45.1% | +227.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +55.6% | +45.6% | +123.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +147.0% | +86.0% | +95.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +253.4% | +207.3% | +265.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.9% | +13.3% | +30.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CVI and DKL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CVI is the less volatile stock with a 0.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DKL's 0.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DKL currently trades 91.3% from its 52-week high vs CVI's 78.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.11x | 0.35x | 0.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $41.67 | $55.89 | $49.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.63 | $37.50 | $13.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.2% | +91.3% | +90.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.8 | 50.0 | 54.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 64K | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
DKL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CVI as "Hold", DKL as "Hold", DK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 9.8% upside for DKL (target: $56) vs -8.0% for CVI (target: $30). For income investors, DKL offers the higher dividend yield at 8.72% vs DK's 2.29%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $30.00 | $56.00 | $44.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 10 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +8.7% | +2.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $4.45 | $1.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% | +2.9% |
DKL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). DK leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
CVI vs DKL vs DK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CVI or DKL or DK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Delek Logistics Partners, LP (DKL) is the stronger pick with 7.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 5% for Delek US Holdings, Inc. (DK). Delek Logistics Partners, LP (DKL) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (13. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CVR Energy, Inc. (CVI) a "Hold" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CVI or DKL or DK?
On trailing P/E, Delek Logistics Partners, LP (DKL) is the cheapest at 15.
5x versus CVR Energy, Inc. at 120. 7x. On forward P/E, Delek US Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CVI or DKL or DK?
Over the past 5 years, CVR Energy, Inc.
(CVI) delivered a total return of +147. 0%, compared to +86. 0% for Delek Logistics Partners, LP (DKL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DK returned +265. 7% versus DKL's +207. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CVI or DKL or DK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CVR Energy, Inc.
(CVI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 11β versus Delek Logistics Partners, LP's 0. 35β — meaning DKL is approximately 216% more volatile than CVI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CVR Energy, Inc. (CVI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 6% for Delek US Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CVI or DKL or DK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Delek Logistics Partners, LP (DKL) is pulling ahead at 7.
7% versus -9. 5% for Delek US Holdings, Inc. (DK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CVR Energy, Inc. grew EPS 287. 4% year-over-year, compared to 10. 4% for Delek Logistics Partners, LP. Over a 3-year CAGR, DKL leads at -0. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CVI or DKL or DK?
Delek Logistics Partners, LP (DKL) is the more profitable company, earning 17.
4% net margin versus -0. 2% for Delek US Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DKL leads at 18. 0% versus 2. 3% for CVI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DKL leads at 20. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CVI or DKL or DK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Delek US Holdings, Inc.
(DK) trades at 11. 8x forward P/E versus 35. 3x for CVR Energy, Inc. — 23. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DKL: 9. 8% to $56. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CVI or DKL or DK?
In this comparison, DKL (8.
7% yield), DK (2. 3% yield) pay a dividend. CVI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CVI or DKL or DK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Delek US Holdings, Inc.
(DK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 33), 2. 3% yield, +265. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DK: +265. 7%, CVI: +253. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CVI and DKL and DK?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CVI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DKL is a small-cap deep-value stock; DK is a small-cap quality compounder stock. DKL, DK pay a dividend while CVI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.