CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.
Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories
Market Cap$11M
5Y Perf.-42.5%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
CVR vs MLI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
MLI
Mueller Industries, Inc.
Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
Market Cap$15.44B
5Y Perf.+939.1%
CVR vs MLI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | CVR | MLI |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication |
| Market Cap | $11M | $15.44B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $26M | $4.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $847M |
| Gross Margin | 8.3% | 27.8% |
| Operating Margin | -14.7% | 22.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 17.2x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $46M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $1.37B |
CVR vs MLI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
CVR
MLI
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chicago Rivet & Mac… (CVR) | 100 | 57.5 | -42.5% |
| Mueller Industries,… (MLI) | 100 | 1039.1 | +939.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CVR vs MLI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: MLI leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.
The Income Pick
CVR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.97, yield 2.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.97, current ratio 5.67x
- Beta 0.97, yield 2.9%, current ratio 5.67x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
MLI
Mueller Industries, Inc.
The Growth Play
MLI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 10.9%, EPS growth 28.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.6%
- 8.4% 10Y total return vs CVR's -26.3%
- 10.9% revenue growth vs CVR's -14.3%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | MLI | 10.9% revenue growth vs CVR's -14.3% |
| Quality / Margins | MLI | 19.4% margin vs CVR's -13.6% |
| Stability / Safety | CVR | Beta 0.97 vs MLI's 1.11 |
| Dividends | CVR | 2.9% yield, vs MLI's 0.7% |
| Momentum (1Y) | MLI | +90.0% vs CVR's -4.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MLI | 23.9% ROA vs CVR's -14.7%, ROIC 44.7% vs -18.1% |
CVR vs MLI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2025
CVR vs MLI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLMLILAGGINGCVR
CVRChicago Rivet & Machi…
1leads
MLIMueller Industries, I…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs CVRMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
MLI5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
CVR3/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
MLI6/7
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
MLI6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MLI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MLI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.4B annually — 168.1x CVR's $26M. MLI is the more profitable business, keeping 19.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CVR's -13.6%. On growth, MLI holds the edge at +19.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CVRChicago Rivet & M… | MLIMueller Industrie… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $26M | $4.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | $1.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | $847M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $652M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +8.3% | +27.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -14.7% | +22.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -13.6% | +19.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.1% | +14.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.6% | +19.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +104.7% | +55.4% |
MLI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
CVR leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CVRChicago Rivet & M… | MLIMueller Industrie… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $11M | $15.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9M | $14.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.94x | 20.28x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 17.19x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.50x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 14.65x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.40x | 3.69x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.54x | 6.12x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 22.48x |
CVR leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MLI leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MLI delivers a 28.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $-18 for CVR. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MLI scores 6/9 vs CVR's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | CVRChicago Rivet & M… | MLIMueller Industrie… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -17.7% | +28.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -14.7% | +23.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -18.1% | +44.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -21.9% | +32.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2M | -$1.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $1.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $46M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 13483.55x |
MLI leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MLI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MLI five years ago would be worth $60,336 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,458 for CVR. Over the past 12 months, MLI leads with a +90.0% total return vs CVR's -4.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MLI at 55.8% vs CVR's -22.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CVRChicago Rivet & M… | MLIMueller Industrie… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -19.2% | +19.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -4.8% | +90.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.4% | +278.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -45.4% | +503.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -26.3% | +837.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -22.5% | +55.8% |
MLI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CVR and MLI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CVR is the less volatile stock with a 0.97 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MLI's 1.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MLI currently trades 99.3% from its 52-week high vs CVR's 75.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CVRChicago Rivet & M… | MLIMueller Industrie… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.97x | 1.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.00 | $140.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.15 | $72.16 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.2% | +99.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.9 | 65.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3K | 677K |
Evenly matched — CVR and MLI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CVR and MLI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, CVR offers the higher dividend yield at 2.93% vs MLI's 0.71%.
| Metric | CVRChicago Rivet & M… | MLIMueller Industrie… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.9% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.33 | $0.98 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.6% |
Evenly matched — CVR and MLI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
MLI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CVR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallMueller Industries, Inc. (MLI)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
CVR vs MLI: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CVR or MLI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Mueller Industries, Inc.
(MLI) is the stronger pick with 10. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 3% for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. (CVR). Mueller Industries, Inc. (MLI) offers the better valuation at 20. 3x trailing P/E (17. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mueller Industries, Inc. (MLI) a "Hold" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CVR or MLI?
Over the past 5 years, Mueller Industries, Inc.
(MLI) delivered a total return of +503. 4%, compared to -45. 4% for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. (CVR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MLI returned +837. 3% versus CVR's -26. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CVR or MLI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.
(CVR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 97β versus Mueller Industries, Inc. 's 1. 11β — meaning MLI is approximately 14% more volatile than CVR relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — CVR or MLI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Mueller Industries, Inc.
(MLI) is pulling ahead at 10. 9% versus -14. 3% for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. (CVR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mueller Industries, Inc. grew EPS 28. 9% year-over-year, compared to -27. 4% for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MLI leads at 1. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CVR or MLI?
Mueller Industries, Inc.
(MLI) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 3% net margin versus -20. 8% for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. — meaning it keeps 18. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MLI leads at 21. 4% versus -19. 1% for CVR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MLI leads at 27. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CVR or MLI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. (CVR) offers the highest yield at 2. 9%, versus 0. 7% for Mueller Industries, Inc. (MLI).
07Is CVR or MLI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Mueller Industries, Inc.
(MLI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 11), 0. 7% yield, +837. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MLI: +837. 3%, CVR: -26. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CVR and MLI?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(CVR: 5.6% · MLI: 19.3%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.