Regulated Electric
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
EDN vs TGS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Integrated
EDN vs TGS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Electric | Oil & Gas Integrated |
| Market Cap | $506M | $2.13B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.63T | $1.65T |
| Net Income (TTM) | $206.54B | $406.73B |
| Gross Margin | 20.9% | 53.7% |
| Operating Margin | 4.2% | 41.3% |
| Forward P/E | 0.1x | 0.0x |
| Total Debt | $476.36B | $1.67T |
| Cash & Equiv. | $23.92B | $803.80B |
EDN vs TGS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Empresa Distribuido… (EDN) | 100 | 800.3 | +700.3% |
| Transportadora de G… (TGS) | 100 | 570.6 | +470.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EDN vs TGS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EDN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 191.4%, EPS growth 59.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 43.7%
- 191.4% revenue growth vs TGS's 64.8%
TGS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.90, yield 4.2%
- 449.2% 10Y total return vs EDN's 66.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.90, Low D/E 53.5%, current ratio 5.00x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 191.4% revenue growth vs TGS's 64.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 0.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.6% margin vs EDN's 7.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.90 vs EDN's 1.94 | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +20.0% vs EDN's -18.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.6% ROA vs EDN's 4.6%, ROIC 19.3% vs 1.9% |
EDN vs TGS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TGS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EDN is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.63T annually — 1.6x TGS's $1.65T. TGS is the more profitable business, keeping 24.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EDN's 7.8%. On growth, TGS holds the edge at +37.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.63T | $1.65T |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $300.0B | $885.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $206.5B | $406.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$260.0B | $224.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +20.9% | +53.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +41.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.8% | +24.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.9% | +13.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +33.3% | +37.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -65.4% | -3.8% |
Valuation Metrics
EDN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.9x trailing earnings, EDN trades at a 63% valuation discount to TGS's 13.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), EDN offers better value at 0.07x vs TGS's 0.08x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $506M | $2.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $832M | $2.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 4.88x | 13.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.07x | 0.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.07x | 0.08x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.87x | 3.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.34x | 1.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.99x | 2.05x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 10.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TGS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TGS delivers a 14.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $12 for EDN. EDN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TGS's 0.53x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TGS scores 8/9 vs EDN's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.7% | +14.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.6% | +9.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.9% | +19.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.6% | +21.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.32x | 0.53x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $452.4B | $868.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $23.9B | $803.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $476.4B | $1.67T |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.13x | 8.01x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TGS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TGS five years ago would be worth $69,845 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $69,603 for EDN. Over the past 12 months, TGS leads with a +20.0% total return vs EDN's -18.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TGS at 38.4% vs EDN's 37.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -17.5% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -18.5% | +20.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +159.2% | +165.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +596.0% | +598.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +66.1% | +449.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +37.4% | +38.4% |
Risk & Volatility
TGS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TGS is the less volatile stock with a 0.90 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EDN's 1.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TGS currently trades 84.3% from its 52-week high vs EDN's 64.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.94x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $38.10 | $36.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.38 | $19.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.5% | +84.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.0 | 52.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 161K | 344K |
Analyst Outlook
TGS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates EDN as "Hold" and TGS as "Buy". TGS is the only dividend payer here at 4.20% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1788.78 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
TGS leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). EDN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
EDN vs TGS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EDN or TGS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte Sociedad Anónima (EDN) is the stronger pick with 191.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 64. 8% for Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. (TGS). Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte Sociedad Anónima (EDN) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (0. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. (TGS) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EDN or TGS?
On trailing P/E, Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte Sociedad Anónima (EDN) is the cheapest at 4.
9x versus Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. at 13. 1x. On forward P/E, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. is actually cheaper at 0. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EDN or TGS?
Over the past 5 years, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. (TGS) delivered a total return of +598. 5%, compared to +596. 0% for Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte Sociedad Anónima (EDN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TGS returned +449. 2% versus EDN's +66. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EDN or TGS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. (TGS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 90β versus Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte Sociedad Anónima's 1. 94β — meaning EDN is approximately 115% more volatile than TGS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte Sociedad Anónima (EDN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 53% for Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EDN or TGS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte Sociedad Anónima (EDN) is pulling ahead at 191.
4% versus 64. 8% for Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. (TGS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte Sociedad Anónima grew EPS 59. 9% year-over-year, compared to 32. 2% for Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EDN leads at 43. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EDN or TGS?
Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. (TGS) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 7% net margin versus 13. 3% for Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte Sociedad Anónima — meaning it keeps 24. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TGS leads at 43. 3% versus 2. 1% for EDN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TGS leads at 53. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EDN or TGS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. (TGS) trades at 0. 0x forward P/E versus 0. 1x for Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte Sociedad Anónima — 0. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — EDN or TGS?
In this comparison, TGS (4.
2% yield) pays a dividend. EDN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is EDN or TGS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. (TGS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 90), 4. 2% yield, +449. 2% 10Y return). Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte Sociedad Anónima (EDN) carries a higher beta of 1. 94 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TGS: +449. 2%, EDN: +66. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EDN and TGS?
These companies operate in different sectors (EDN (Utilities) and TGS (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
TGS pays a dividend while EDN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.