Renewable Utilities
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
EE vs GLNG vs NFE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Regulated Gas
EE vs GLNG vs NFE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Renewable Utilities | Oil & Gas Midstream | Regulated Gas |
| Market Cap | $1.10B | $5.71B | $211M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $434.35B | $394M | $1.50B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $68.93B | $66M | $-1.84B |
| Gross Margin | 0.1% | 46.9% | 20.6% |
| Operating Margin | 18.9% | 34.4% | -34.4% |
| Forward P/E | 21.2x | 68.8x | — |
| Total Debt | $1.43B | $2.76B | $8.57B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $541M | $1.18B | $357M |
EE vs GLNG vs NFE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Excelerate Energy, … (EE) | 100 | 126.8 | +26.8% |
| Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) | 100 | 244.9 | +144.9% |
| New Fortress Energy… (NFE) | 100 | 1.9 | -98.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EE vs GLNG vs NFE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EE is the clearest fit if your priority is value and efficiency.
- Better valuation composite
- 6.6% ROA vs NFE's -15.5%, ROIC 8.7% vs -1.3%
GLNG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.19, yield 5.5%
- Rev growth 51.1%, EPS growth 35.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.7%
- 262.2% 10Y total return vs EE's 30.0%
NFE plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 51.1% revenue growth vs NFE's -36.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.7% margin vs NFE's -122.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.19 vs NFE's 1.54, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.5% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs EE's 0.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +38.9% vs NFE's -87.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.6% ROA vs NFE's -15.5%, ROIC 8.7% vs -1.3% |
EE vs GLNG vs NFE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
EE vs GLNG vs NFE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GLNG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EE is the larger business by revenue, generating $434.4B annually — 1103.8x GLNG's $394M. GLNG is the more profitable business, keeping 16.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NFE's -122.6%. On growth, EE holds the edge at +1374.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $434.4B | $394M | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $113.3B | $185M | -$274M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $68.9B | $66M | -$1.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $32.8B | -$430M | -$122M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +0.1% | +46.9% | +20.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.9% | +34.4% | -34.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.9% | +16.7% | -122.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | -109.2% | -8.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1374.6% | +101.5% | -40.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -19.6% | +2.1% | -150.5% |
Valuation Metrics
EE leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 26.8x trailing earnings, EE trades at a 68% valuation discount to GLNG's 84.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, EE's 4.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NFE's 117.5x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $5.7B | $211M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.0B | $7.3B | $8.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 26.77x | 84.09x | -0.11x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.24x | 68.82x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.62x | 39.48x | 117.45x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.89x | 14.52x | 0.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.47x | 2.68x | 0.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
EE leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EE delivers a 7.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-158 for NFE. EE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.64x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NFE's 27.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GLNG scores 8/9 vs NFE's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.2% | +3.2% | -158.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.6% | +1.2% | -15.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.7% | +2.9% | -1.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.3% | +3.3% | -2.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.64x | 1.33x | 27.68x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $889M | $1.6B | $8.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $541M | $1.2B | $357M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.4B | $2.8B | $8.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.07x | 4.50x | -0.22x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GLNG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GLNG five years ago would be worth $51,436 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,265 for NFE. Over the past 12 months, GLNG leads with a +38.9% total return vs NFE's -87.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GLNG at 39.6% vs NFE's -64.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.2% | +44.7% | -33.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +35.0% | +38.9% | -87.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +60.7% | +172.0% | -95.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +30.0% | +414.4% | -87.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +30.0% | +262.2% | -58.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.1% | +39.6% | -64.8% |
Risk & Volatility
GLNG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GLNG is the less volatile stock with a 0.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NFE's 1.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GLNG currently trades 95.4% from its 52-week high vs NFE's 10.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.55x | 0.19x | 1.54x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $43.17 | $57.29 | $7.37 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $21.29 | $35.02 | $0.56 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.4% | +95.4% | +10.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.6 | 72.0 | 62.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 468K | 2.2M | 13.7M |
Analyst Outlook
GLNG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EE as "Buy", GLNG as "Buy", NFE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1962.8% upside for NFE (target: $15) vs -3.0% for GLNG (target: $53). For income investors, GLNG offers the higher dividend yield at 5.52% vs EE's 0.81%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $42.00 | $53.00 | $15.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 48 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | +5.5% | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.28 | $3.02 | $0.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.5% | 0.0% |
GLNG leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). EE leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
EE vs GLNG vs NFE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EE or GLNG or NFE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) is the stronger pick with 51.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -36. 4% for New Fortress Energy Inc. (NFE). Excelerate Energy, Inc. (EE) offers the better valuation at 26. 8x trailing P/E (21. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Excelerate Energy, Inc. (EE) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EE or GLNG or NFE?
On trailing P/E, Excelerate Energy, Inc.
(EE) is the cheapest at 26. 8x versus Golar LNG Limited at 84. 1x. On forward P/E, Excelerate Energy, Inc. is actually cheaper at 21. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EE or GLNG or NFE?
Over the past 5 years, Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) delivered a total return of +414.
4%, compared to -87. 4% for New Fortress Energy Inc. (NFE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GLNG returned +262. 2% versus NFE's -58. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EE or GLNG or NFE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
19β versus New Fortress Energy Inc. 's 1. 54β — meaning NFE is approximately 695% more volatile than GLNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Excelerate Energy, Inc. (EE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 64% versus 28% for New Fortress Energy Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EE or GLNG or NFE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) is pulling ahead at 51.
1% versus -36. 4% for New Fortress Energy Inc. (NFE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Golar LNG Limited grew EPS 35. 4% year-over-year, compared to -430. 4% for New Fortress Energy Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GLNG leads at 13. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EE or GLNG or NFE?
Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
7% net margin versus -122. 6% for New Fortress Energy Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GLNG leads at 34. 4% versus -11. 3% for NFE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GLNG leads at 46. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EE or GLNG or NFE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Excelerate Energy, Inc.
(EE) trades at 21. 2x forward P/E versus 68. 8x for Golar LNG Limited — 47. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NFE: 1962. 8% to $15. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — EE or GLNG or NFE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) offers the highest yield at 5. 5%, versus 0. 8% for Excelerate Energy, Inc. (EE).
09Is EE or GLNG or NFE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
19), 5. 5% yield, +262. 2% 10Y return). New Fortress Energy Inc. (NFE) carries a higher beta of 1. 54 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GLNG: +262. 2%, NFE: -58. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EE and GLNG and NFE?
These companies operate in different sectors (EE (Utilities) and GLNG (Energy) and NFE (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: EE is a small-cap high-growth stock; GLNG is a small-cap high-growth stock; NFE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.