Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
EMBJ vs HII
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
EMBJ vs HII — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $12.25B | $12.39B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.39B | $12.85B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $315M | $605M |
| Gross Margin | 18.0% | 12.4% |
| Operating Margin | 10.4% | 4.9% |
| Forward P/E | 23.7x | 18.2x |
| Total Debt | $2.60B | $3.15B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.56B | $774M |
Quick Verdict: EMBJ vs HII
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EMBJ is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 21.4%, EPS growth 118.2%
- 21.4% NII/revenue growth vs HII's 8.2%
- 5.5% margin vs HII's 4.7%
HII carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.69, yield 1.7%
- 130.7% 10Y total return vs EMBJ's 2.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.69, Low D/E 62.0%, current ratio 1.13x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.4% NII/revenue growth vs HII's 8.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.2x vs 23.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.5% margin vs HII's 4.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.69 vs EMBJ's 1.91, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield; 13-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.1% vs EMBJ's +2.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.9% ROA vs EMBJ's 2.6%, ROIC 6.2% vs 8.4% |
EMBJ vs HII — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
EMBJ vs HII — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EMBJ leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HII is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.8B annually — 2.0x EMBJ's $6.4B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 5.5% (EMBJ) to 4.7% (HII).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.4B | $12.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $893M | $953M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $315M | $605M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $703M | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.0% | +12.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.4% | +4.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.5% | +4.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.3% | +8.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +13.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -33.3% | 0.0% |
Valuation Metrics
HII leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.4x trailing earnings, HII trades at a 42% valuation discount to EMBJ's 35.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, EMBJ's 14.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HII's 15.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.3B | $12.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.3B | $14.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 35.32x | 20.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 23.71x | 18.15x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.59x | 15.76x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.92x | 0.99x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.72x | 2.44x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 30.26x | 15.61x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HII leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HII delivers a 12.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $9 for EMBJ. HII carries lower financial leverage with a 0.62x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EMBJ's 0.78x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HII scores 9/9 vs EMBJ's 8/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.8% | +12.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.6% | +4.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.4% | +6.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.2% | +6.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.78x | 0.62x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.0B | $2.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.6B | $774M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.6B | $3.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.01x | 8.86x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HII leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HII five years ago would be worth $15,671 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,197 for EMBJ. Over the past 12 months, HII leads with a +39.1% total return vs EMBJ's +2.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HII at 19.4% vs EMBJ's 0.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.6% | -9.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +2.0% | +39.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.0% | +70.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.0% | +56.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.9% | +130.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.7% | +19.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EMBJ and HII each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HII is the less volatile stock with a 0.69 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EMBJ's 1.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EMBJ currently trades 84.0% from its 52-week high vs HII's 68.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.91x | 0.69x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $80.75 | $460.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $54.28 | $215.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.0% | +68.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.0 | 21.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 476K |
Analyst Outlook
HII leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates EMBJ as "Buy" and HII as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 33.5% upside for HII (target: $420) vs -4.2% for EMBJ (target: $65). HII is the only dividend payer here at 1.72% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $65.00 | $420.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 21 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $5.42 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
HII leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). EMBJ leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
EMBJ vs HII: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EMBJ or HII a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Embraer S.
A. (EMBJ) is the stronger pick with 21. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 2% for Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. (HII). Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. (HII) offers the better valuation at 20. 4x trailing P/E (18. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Embraer S. A. (EMBJ) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EMBJ or HII?
On trailing P/E, Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.
(HII) is the cheapest at 20. 4x versus Embraer S. A. at 35. 3x. On forward P/E, Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 18. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EMBJ or HII?
Over the past 5 years, Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.
(HII) delivered a total return of +56. 7%, compared to +2. 0% for Embraer S. A. (EMBJ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HII returned +130. 7% versus EMBJ's +2. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EMBJ or HII?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.
(HII) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 69β versus Embraer S. A. 's 1. 91β — meaning EMBJ is approximately 178% more volatile than HII relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. (HII) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 62% versus 78% for Embraer S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EMBJ or HII?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Embraer S.
A. (EMBJ) is pulling ahead at 21. 4% versus 8. 2% for Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. (HII). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Embraer S. A. grew EPS 118. 2% year-over-year, compared to 10. 2% for Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EMBJ or HII?
Embraer S.
A. (EMBJ) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 5% net margin versus 4. 8% for Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EMBJ leads at 10. 4% versus 4. 9% for HII. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EMBJ leads at 18. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EMBJ or HII more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.
(HII) trades at 18. 2x forward P/E versus 23. 7x for Embraer S. A. — 5. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HII: 33. 5% to $420. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — EMBJ or HII?
In this comparison, HII (1.
7% yield) pays a dividend. EMBJ does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is EMBJ or HII better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.
(HII) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 69), 1. 7% yield, +130. 7% 10Y return). Embraer S. A. (EMBJ) carries a higher beta of 1. 91 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HII: +130. 7%, EMBJ: +2. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EMBJ and HII?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: EMBJ is a mid-cap high-growth stock; HII is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. HII pays a dividend while EMBJ does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.