Regulated Electric
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ENO vs ETR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Electric
ENO vs ETR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Electric | Regulated Electric |
| Market Cap | $10.18B | $51.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13.29B | $13.29B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.78B | $1.80B |
| Gross Margin | 67.5% | 43.3% |
| Operating Margin | 23.1% | 22.6% |
| Forward P/E | 12.6x | 25.5x |
| Total Debt | $3.03B | $30.93B |
| Cash & Equiv. | — | $46M |
ENO vs ETR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entergy New Orleans… (ENO) | 100 | 82.8 | -17.2% |
| Entergy Corporation (ETR) | 100 | 220.1 | +120.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ENO vs ETR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ENO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 9.0%, EPS growth 59.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 135.0%
- PEG 0.17 vs ETR's 10.06
- 9.0% revenue growth vs ETR's 9.0%
ETR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.30, yield 2.1%
- 246.8% 10Y total return vs ENO's 37.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.30, current ratio 0.73x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.0% revenue growth vs ETR's 9.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.6x vs 25.5x), PEG 0.17 vs 10.06 | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.6% margin vs ENO's 13.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.30 vs ENO's 0.75 | |
| Dividends | 2.1% yield; 11-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +36.0% vs ENO's +6.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.5% ROA vs ETR's 2.5%, ROIC 22.5% vs 5.0% |
ENO vs ETR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ENO vs ETR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ENO leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ENO and ETR operate at a comparable scale, with $13.3B and $13.3B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 13.6% (ETR) to 13.4% (ENO).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13.3B | $13.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5.2B | $5.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.8B | $1.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1.1B | -$3.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.5% | +43.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.1% | +22.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.4% | +13.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.0% | -22.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.0% | +12.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.2% | +1.2% |
Valuation Metrics
ENO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.6x trailing earnings, ENO trades at a 80% valuation discount to ETR's 28.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ENO offers better value at 0.08x vs ETR's 11.30x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10.2B | $51.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.2B | $82.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.63x | 28.65x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.58x | 25.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.08x | 11.30x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.50x | 14.70x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.79x | 3.96x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.59x | 2.93x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.22x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ENO leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ENO delivers a 13.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $11 for ETR. ENO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ETR's 1.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ETR scores 6/9 vs ENO's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.9% | +10.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +14.5% | +2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +22.5% | +5.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +5.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.18x | 1.80x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.0B | $30.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | — | $46M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.0B | $30.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.61x | 2.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ETR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ETR five years ago would be worth $22,756 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,403 for ENO. Over the past 12 months, ETR leads with a +36.0% total return vs ENO's +6.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ETR at 30.6% vs ENO's 2.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.5% | +20.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +6.3% | +36.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +9.0% | +122.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +14.0% | +127.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +37.1% | +246.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.9% | +30.6% |
Risk & Volatility
ETR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ETR is the less volatile stock with a 0.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ENO's 0.75 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ETR currently trades 94.6% from its 52-week high vs ENO's 88.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.75x | 0.30x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.95 | $118.44 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.00 | $79.40 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.3% | +94.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.6 | 49.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6K | 2.8M |
Analyst Outlook
ETR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
ETR is the only dividend payer here at 2.13% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $116.92 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.39 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ENO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ETR leads in 3 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
ENO vs ETR: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ENO or ETR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Entergy New Orleans, LLC First Mortgage Bonds, 5.
50% Series due April 1, 2066 (ENO) is the stronger pick with 9. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 0% for Entergy Corporation (ETR). Entergy New Orleans, LLC First Mortgage Bonds, 5. 50% Series due April 1, 2066 (ENO) offers the better valuation at 5. 6x trailing P/E (12. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Entergy Corporation (ETR) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ENO or ETR?
On trailing P/E, Entergy New Orleans, LLC First Mortgage Bonds, 5.
50% Series due April 1, 2066 (ENO) is the cheapest at 5. 6x versus Entergy Corporation at 28. 7x. On forward P/E, Entergy New Orleans, LLC First Mortgage Bonds, 5. 50% Series due April 1, 2066 is actually cheaper at 12. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Entergy New Orleans, LLC First Mortgage Bonds, 5. 50% Series due April 1, 2066 wins at 0. 17x versus Entergy Corporation's 10. 06x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ENO or ETR?
Over the past 5 years, Entergy Corporation (ETR) delivered a total return of +127.
6%, compared to +14. 0% for Entergy New Orleans, LLC First Mortgage Bonds, 5. 50% Series due April 1, 2066 (ENO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ETR returned +246. 8% versus ENO's +37. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ENO or ETR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Entergy Corporation (ETR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
30β versus Entergy New Orleans, LLC First Mortgage Bonds, 5. 50% Series due April 1, 2066's 0. 75β — meaning ENO is approximately 148% more volatile than ETR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Entergy New Orleans, LLC First Mortgage Bonds, 5. 50% Series due April 1, 2066 (ENO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 180% for Entergy Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ENO or ETR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Entergy New Orleans, LLC First Mortgage Bonds, 5.
50% Series due April 1, 2066 (ENO) is pulling ahead at 9. 0% versus 9. 0% for Entergy Corporation (ETR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Entergy New Orleans, LLC First Mortgage Bonds, 5. 50% Series due April 1, 2066 grew EPS 59. 6% year-over-year, compared to 59. 6% for Entergy Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, ENO leads at 135. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ENO or ETR?
Entergy Corporation (ETR) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
7% net margin versus 13. 6% for Entergy New Orleans, LLC First Mortgage Bonds, 5. 50% Series due April 1, 2066 — meaning it keeps 13. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ENO leads at 24. 7% versus 23. 6% for ETR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ENO leads at 66. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ENO or ETR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Entergy New Orleans, LLC First Mortgage Bonds, 5. 50% Series due April 1, 2066 (ENO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 17x versus Entergy Corporation's 10. 06x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Entergy New Orleans, LLC First Mortgage Bonds, 5. 50% Series due April 1, 2066 (ENO) trades at 12. 6x forward P/E versus 25. 5x for Entergy Corporation — 12. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — ENO or ETR?
In this comparison, ETR (2.
1% yield) pays a dividend. ENO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ENO or ETR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Entergy Corporation (ETR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
30), 2. 1% yield, +246. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ETR: +246. 8%, ENO: +37. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ENO and ETR?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ENO is a mid-cap deep-value stock; ETR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. ETR pays a dividend while ENO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.