ESLT vs LHX vs HII

For growth investors, Elbit Systems Ltd.

(ESLT) is the stronger pick with 23. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 5% for L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX). Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. (HII) offers the better valuation at 20. 8x trailing P/E (18. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.

(HII) is the cheapest at 20. 8x versus Elbit Systems Ltd. at 67. 3x. On forward P/E, Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 18. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: L3Harris Technologies, Inc. wins at 2. 49x versus Elbit Systems Ltd. 's 3. 64x.

Over the past 5 years, Elbit Systems Ltd.

(ESLT) delivered a total return of +518. 9%, compared to +49. 8% for L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ESLT returned +779. 1% versus HII's +132. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Elbit Systems Ltd.

(ESLT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. 's 0. 69β — meaning HII is approximately 96% more volatile than ESLT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Elbit Systems Ltd. (ESLT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 62% for Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Elbit Systems Ltd.

(ESLT) is pulling ahead at 23. 9% versus 2. 5% for L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Elbit Systems Ltd. grew EPS 71. 7% year-over-year, compared to 8. 4% for L3Harris Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ESLT leads at 17. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

L3Harris Technologies, Inc.

(LHX) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 3% net margin versus 4. 8% for Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LHX leads at 10. 0% versus 4. 9% for HII. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LHX leads at 25. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 49x versus Elbit Systems Ltd. 's 3. 64x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. (HII) trades at 18. 4x forward P/E versus 59. 8x for Elbit Systems Ltd. — 41. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HII: 31. 4% to $420. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. (HII) offers the highest yield at 1. 7%, versus 0. 3% for Elbit Systems Ltd. (ESLT).

For long-horizon retirement investors, L3Harris Technologies, Inc.

(LHX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), 1. 6% yield, +353. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LHX: +353. 9%, HII: +132. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: ESLT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; LHX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; HII is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. LHX, HII pay a dividend while ESLT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.