Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FIBK vs GBCI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
FIBK vs GBCI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $3.55B | $6.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.06B | $1.43B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $302M | $239M |
| Gross Margin | 97.5% | 69.0% |
| Operating Margin | 37.0% | 22.9% |
| Forward P/E | 13.7x | 16.1x |
| Total Debt | $776M | $2.90B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $358M | $322M |
Quick Verdict: FIBK vs GBCI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FIBK is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, yield 5.2%
- Low D/E 22.5%, current ratio 0.04x
- yield 5.2%, current ratio 0.04x
GBCI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 14.5%, EPS growth 18.5%
- 149.0% 10Y total return vs FIBK's 42.9%
- 14.5% NII/revenue growth vs FIBK's -28.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.5% NII/revenue growth vs FIBK's -28.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.7x vs 16.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs FIBK's 0.6% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (22.5% vs 68.8%) | |
| Dividends | 5.2% yield, vs GBCI's 2.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +24.3% vs FIBK's +6.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs FIBK's 0.6% |
FIBK vs GBCI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FIBK vs GBCI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIBK leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GBCI and FIBK operate at a comparable scale, with $1.4B and $1.1B in trailing revenue. FIBK is the more profitable business, keeping 28.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GBCI's 16.8%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $428M | $365M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $302M | $239M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $278M | $337M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +97.5% | +69.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +37.0% | +22.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +28.5% | +16.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +26.2% | +24.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +116.0% | -9.3% |
Valuation Metrics
FIBK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.4x trailing earnings, FIBK trades at a 50% valuation discount to GBCI's 25.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FIBK's 10.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GBCI's 24.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.5B | $6.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.0B | $9.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.38x | 25.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.70x | 16.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 4.06x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.12x | 24.79x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.35x | 4.54x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.09x | 1.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.77x | 18.62x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FIBK leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FIBK delivers a 8.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $7 for GBCI. FIBK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GBCI's 0.69x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.8% | +6.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.9% | +3.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.3% | +1.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.23x | 0.69x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $418M | $2.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $358M | $322M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $776M | $2.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.11x | 0.80x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GBCI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FIBK five years ago would be worth $12,580 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,252 for GBCI. Over the past 12 months, GBCI leads with a +24.3% total return vs FIBK's +6.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GBCI at 23.5% vs FIBK's 4.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.1% | +12.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +6.0% | +24.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.1% | +88.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.8% | -7.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.9% | +149.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.8% | +23.5% |
Risk & Volatility
FIBK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Risk & Volatility
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | — | 1.17x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $39.26 | $53.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $31.62 | $39.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.7% | +92.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.3 | 54.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 870K |
Analyst Outlook
FIBK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FIBK as "Buy" and GBCI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 15.2% upside for GBCI (target: $57) vs 5.3% for FIBK (target: $38). For income investors, FIBK offers the higher dividend yield at 5.19% vs GBCI's 2.51%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $38.33 | $57.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.2% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.89 | $1.25 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.4% | 0.0% |
FIBK leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). GBCI leads in 1 (Total Returns).
FIBK vs GBCI: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FIBK or GBCI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Glacier Bancorp, Inc.
(GBCI) is the stronger pick with 14. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -28. 5% for First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. (FIBK). First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. (FIBK) offers the better valuation at 12. 4x trailing P/E (13. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. (FIBK) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FIBK or GBCI?
On trailing P/E, First Interstate BancSystem, Inc.
(FIBK) is the cheapest at 12. 4x versus Glacier Bancorp, Inc. at 25. 0x. On forward P/E, First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FIBK or GBCI?
Over the past 5 years, First Interstate BancSystem, Inc.
(FIBK) delivered a total return of +25. 8%, compared to -7. 5% for Glacier Bancorp, Inc. (GBCI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GBCI returned +149. 0% versus FIBK's +42. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FIBK or GBCI?
On balance sheet safety, First Interstate BancSystem, Inc.
(FIBK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 69% for Glacier Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FIBK or GBCI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Glacier Bancorp, Inc.
(GBCI) is pulling ahead at 14. 5% versus -28. 5% for First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. (FIBK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. grew EPS 34. 2% year-over-year, compared to 18. 5% for Glacier Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FIBK or GBCI?
First Interstate BancSystem, Inc.
(FIBK) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 5% net margin versus 16. 8% for Glacier Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FIBK leads at 37. 0% versus 22. 9% for GBCI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FIBK leads at 97. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FIBK or GBCI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, First Interstate BancSystem, Inc.
(FIBK) trades at 13. 7x forward P/E versus 16. 1x for Glacier Bancorp, Inc. — 2. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GBCI: 15. 2% to $57. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — FIBK or GBCI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. (FIBK) offers the highest yield at 5. 2%, versus 2. 5% for Glacier Bancorp, Inc. (GBCI).
09Is FIBK or GBCI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Glacier Bancorp, Inc.
(GBCI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 17), 2. 5% yield, +149. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GBCI: +149. 0%, FIBK: +42. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FIBK and GBCI?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FIBK is a small-cap deep-value stock; GBCI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.