FIS vs WEX

For growth investors, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

(FIS) is the stronger pick with 5. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 2% for WEX Inc. (WEX). WEX Inc. (WEX) offers the better valuation at 17. 0x trailing P/E (7. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, WEX Inc.

(WEX) is the cheapest at 17. 0x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 63. 0x. On forward P/E, WEX Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 4x.

Over the past 5 years, WEX Inc.

(WEX) delivered a total return of -26. 5%, compared to -63. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WEX returned +60. 9% versus FIS's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

(FIS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus WEX Inc. 's 1. 16β — meaning WEX is approximately 53% more volatile than FIS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 4% for WEX Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

(FIS) is pulling ahead at 5. 4% versus 1. 2% for WEX Inc. (WEX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: WEX Inc. grew EPS 12. 9% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WEX leads at 4. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

WEX Inc.

(WEX) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 4% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WEX leads at 25. 4% versus 16. 5% for FIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WEX leads at 54. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, WEX Inc.

(WEX) trades at 7. 4x forward P/E versus 7. 5x for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — 0. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 42. 6% to $67. 38.

In this comparison, FIS (3.

5% yield) pays a dividend. WEX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

(FIS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 76), 3. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FIS: -13. 2%, WEX: +60. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; WEX is a small-cap deep-value stock. FIS pays a dividend while WEX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.