FMC
FMC Corporation
Agricultural Inputs
Market Cap$1.85B
5Y Perf.-85.0%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
FMC vs NTR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
NTR
Nutrien Ltd.
Agricultural Inputs
Market Cap$35.51B
5Y Perf.+117.1%
FMC vs NTR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | FMC | NTR |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural Inputs | Agricultural Inputs |
| Market Cap | $1.85B | $35.51B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.43B | $26.90B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2.50B | $2.27B |
| Gross Margin | 35.3% | 31.1% |
| Operating Margin | -59.5% | 13.4% |
| Forward P/E | 8.4x | 13.0x |
| Total Debt | $4.20B | $12.93B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $585M | $700M |
FMC vs NTR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
FMC
NTR
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FMC Corporation (FMC) | 100 | 15.0 | -85.0% |
| Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) | 100 | 217.1 | +117.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FMC vs NTR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: NTR leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. FMC Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FMC
FMC Corporation
The Income Pick
FMC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 1.63, yield 15.7%
- Beta 1.63, yield 15.7%, current ratio 1.32x
- Lower P/E (8.4x vs 13.0x)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
NTR
Nutrien Ltd.
The Growth Play
NTR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 5.3%, EPS growth 248.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -10.3%
- 64.0% 10Y total return vs FMC's -26.2%
- Lower volatility, beta -0.07, Low D/E 51.1%, current ratio 1.34x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | NTR | 5.3% revenue growth vs FMC's -18.3% |
| Value | FMC | Lower P/E (8.4x vs 13.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | NTR | 8.4% margin vs FMC's -72.9% |
| Stability / Safety | NTR | Lower D/E ratio (51.1% vs 200.0%) |
| Dividends | FMC | 15.7% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs NTR's 3.0% |
| Momentum (1Y) | NTR | +34.6% vs FMC's -54.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | NTR | 4.3% ROA vs FMC's -23.0%, ROIC 8.0% vs -21.2% |
FMC vs NTR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
Segment breakdown not available.
FMC vs NTR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLNTRLAGGINGFMC
FMCFMC Corporation
1leads
NTRNutrien Ltd.
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs FMCMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
NTR5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
FMC4/4
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
NTR7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
NTR6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
NTR2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTR is the larger business by revenue, generating $26.9B annually — 7.8x FMC's $3.4B. NTR is the more profitable business, keeping 8.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FMC's -72.9%. On growth, NTR holds the edge at +6.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | FMCFMC Corporation | NTRNutrien Ltd. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.4B | $26.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1.9B | $6.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2.5B | $2.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$91M | $2.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +35.3% | +31.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -59.5% | +13.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -72.9% | +8.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.7% | +7.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.1% | +6.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -17.8% | +4.2% |
NTR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
FMC leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FMCFMC Corporation | NTRNutrien Ltd. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.8B | $35.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.5B | $47.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.83x | 15.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.37x | 12.97x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.38x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 7.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.53x | 1.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.88x | 1.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 17.43x |
FMC leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NTR leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NTR delivers a 9.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-82 for FMC. NTR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.51x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FMC's 2.00x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NTR scores 8/9 vs FMC's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | FMCFMC Corporation | NTRNutrien Ltd. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -82.3% | +9.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -23.0% | +4.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -21.2% | +8.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -25.9% | +9.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.00x | 0.51x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.6B | $12.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $585M | $700M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.2B | $12.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.24x | 5.44x |
NTR leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NTR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NTR five years ago would be worth $14,121 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,128 for FMC. Over the past 12 months, NTR leads with a +34.6% total return vs FMC's -54.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTR at 7.6% vs FMC's -43.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FMCFMC Corporation | NTRNutrien Ltd. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.7% | +17.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -54.8% | +34.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.5% | +24.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.7% | +41.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -26.2% | +64.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -43.0% | +7.6% |
NTR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NTR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NTR is the less volatile stock with a -0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FMC's 1.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NTR currently trades 86.5% from its 52-week high vs FMC's 33.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FMCFMC Corporation | NTRNutrien Ltd. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.63x | -0.07x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $44.78 | $85.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.17 | $53.03 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +33.0% | +86.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.9 | 59.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.2M | 3.7M |
NTR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FMC and NTR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FMC as "Hold" and NTR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 14.1% upside for NTR (target: $84) vs 5.3% for FMC (target: $16). For income investors, FMC offers the higher dividend yield at 15.73% vs NTR's 3.01%.
| Metric | FMCFMC Corporation | NTRNutrien Ltd. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.58 | $84.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 42 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +15.7% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 7 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.33 | $2.22 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +1.6% |
Evenly matched — FMC and NTR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
NTR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FMC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallNutrien Ltd. (NTR)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
FMC vs NTR: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FMC or NTR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Nutrien Ltd.
(NTR) is the stronger pick with 5. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 3% for FMC Corporation (FMC). Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) offers the better valuation at 15. 6x trailing P/E (13. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FMC or NTR?
On forward P/E, FMC Corporation is actually cheaper at 8.
4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FMC or NTR?
Over the past 5 years, Nutrien Ltd.
(NTR) delivered a total return of +41. 2%, compared to -78. 7% for FMC Corporation (FMC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NTR returned +64. 0% versus FMC's -26. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FMC or NTR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nutrien Ltd.
(NTR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 07β versus FMC Corporation's 1. 63β — meaning FMC is approximately -2346% more volatile than NTR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 51% versus 2% for FMC Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FMC or NTR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nutrien Ltd.
(NTR) is pulling ahead at 5. 3% versus -18. 3% for FMC Corporation (FMC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Nutrien Ltd. grew EPS 248. 5% year-over-year, compared to -757. 4% for FMC Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, NTR leads at -10. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FMC or NTR?
Nutrien Ltd.
(NTR) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 4% net margin versus -64. 6% for FMC Corporation — meaning it keeps 8. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NTR leads at 14. 5% versus -54. 4% for FMC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FMC leads at 37. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FMC or NTR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, FMC Corporation (FMC) trades at 8.
4x forward P/E versus 13. 0x for Nutrien Ltd. — 4. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NTR: 14. 1% to $84. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — FMC or NTR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
FMC Corporation (FMC) offers the highest yield at 15. 7%, versus 3. 0% for Nutrien Ltd. (NTR).
09Is FMC or NTR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Nutrien Ltd.
(NTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 07), 3. 0% yield). FMC Corporation (FMC) carries a higher beta of 1. 63 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NTR: +64. 0%, FMC: -26. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FMC and NTR?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FMC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NTR is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(FMC: -4.1% · NTR: 6.8%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.