FRO
Frontline Ltd.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$8.39B
5Y Perf.+312.9%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
FRO vs INSW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$4.24B
5Y Perf.+278.2%
FRO vs INSW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | FRO | INSW |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $8.39B | $4.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.77B | $843M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $218M | $309M |
| Gross Margin | 26.5% | 47.2% |
| Operating Margin | 25.5% | 42.4% |
| Forward P/E | 5.9x | 8.1x |
| Total Debt | $3.75B | $576M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $414M | $117M |
FRO vs INSW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
FRO
INSW
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Frontline Ltd. (FRO) | 100 | 412.9 | +312.9% |
| International Seawa… (INSW) | 100 | 378.2 | +278.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FRO vs INSW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: FRO leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. International Seaways, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FRO
Frontline Ltd.
The Income Pick
FRO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.36, yield 5.2%
- Rev growth 13.8%, EPS growth -24.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.36, current ratio 1.39x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
INSW is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 9.7% 10Y total return vs FRO's 5.1%
- 36.7% margin vs FRO's 12.3%
- +146.7% vs FRO's +124.6%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | FRO | 13.8% revenue growth vs INSW's -11.4% |
| Value | FRO | Lower P/E (5.9x vs 8.1x) |
| Quality / Margins | INSW | 36.7% margin vs FRO's 12.3% |
| Stability / Safety | FRO | Beta 0.36 vs INSW's 0.43 |
| Dividends | FRO | 5.2% yield, vs INSW's 3.4% |
| Momentum (1Y) | INSW | +146.7% vs FRO's +124.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | INSW | 11.8% ROA vs FRO's 3.8%, ROIC 9.4% vs 10.6% |
FRO vs INSW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2025
FRO vs INSW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLINSWLAGGINGFRO
FROFrontline Ltd.
2leads
INSWInternational Seaways…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs FROMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
INSW5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
INSW3/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
INSW7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
FRO4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
FRO1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INSW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FRO is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.8B annually — 2.1x INSW's $843M. INSW is the more profitable business, keeping 36.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FRO's 12.3%. On growth, INSW holds the edge at +37.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | FROFrontline Ltd. | INSWInternational Sea… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.8B | $843M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $781M | $521M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $218M | $309M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $557M | $38M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.5% | +47.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.5% | +42.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.3% | +36.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +31.5% | +4.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.8% | +37.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -33.3% | +2.6% |
INSW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
INSW leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.8x trailing earnings, INSW trades at a 19% valuation discount to FRO's 16.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, INSW's 10.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FRO's 10.5x.
| Metric | FROFrontline Ltd. | INSWInternational Sea… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8.4B | $4.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11.7B | $4.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.91x | 13.77x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 5.93x | 8.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.72x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.46x | 10.00x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.09x | 5.03x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.59x | 2.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 111.18x |
INSW leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INSW leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INSW delivers a 16.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $9 for FRO. INSW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FRO's 1.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INSW scores 6/9 vs FRO's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | FROFrontline Ltd. | INSWInternational Sea… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.4% | +16.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.8% | +11.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.6% | +9.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.1% | +12.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.60x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.3B | $459M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $414M | $117M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.7B | $576M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.87x | 3.69x |
INSW leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FRO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FRO five years ago would be worth $57,145 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $52,215 for INSW. Over the past 12 months, INSW leads with a +146.7% total return vs FRO's +124.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FRO at 44.3% vs INSW's 38.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FROFrontline Ltd. | INSWInternational Sea… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +88.2% | +87.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +124.6% | +146.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +200.6% | +167.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +471.4% | +422.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +506.8% | +970.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +44.3% | +38.9% |
FRO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FRO and INSW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FRO is the less volatile stock with a 0.36 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than INSW's 0.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | FROFrontline Ltd. | INSWInternational Sea… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.36x | 0.43x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $39.89 | $88.52 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $16.25 | $35.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.5% | +96.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.2 | 75.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.0M | 585K |
Evenly matched — FRO and INSW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
FRO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FRO as "Hold" and INSW as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 2.1% upside for FRO (target: $39) vs -2.8% for INSW (target: $83). For income investors, FRO offers the higher dividend yield at 5.17% vs INSW's 3.40%.
| Metric | FROFrontline Ltd. | INSWInternational Sea… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $38.50 | $83.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.2% | +3.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.95 | $2.92 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
FRO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
INSW leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). FRO leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
Best OverallInternational Seaways, Inc. (INSW)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
FRO vs INSW: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FRO or INSW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Frontline Ltd.
(FRO) is the stronger pick with 13. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 4% for International Seaways, Inc. (INSW). International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) offers the better valuation at 13. 8x trailing P/E (8. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FRO or INSW?
On trailing P/E, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is the cheapest at 13. 8x versus Frontline Ltd. at 16. 9x. On forward P/E, Frontline Ltd. is actually cheaper at 5. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FRO or INSW?
Over the past 5 years, Frontline Ltd.
(FRO) delivered a total return of +471. 4%, compared to +422. 1% for International Seaways, Inc. (INSW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INSW returned +970. 0% versus FRO's +506. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FRO or INSW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Frontline Ltd.
(FRO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 36β versus International Seaways, Inc. 's 0. 43β — meaning INSW is approximately 20% more volatile than FRO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 160% for Frontline Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FRO or INSW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Frontline Ltd.
(FRO) is pulling ahead at 13. 8% versus -11. 4% for International Seaways, Inc. (INSW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Frontline Ltd. grew EPS -24. 4% year-over-year, compared to -25. 7% for International Seaways, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FRO leads at 39. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FRO or INSW?
International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 7% net margin versus 24. 2% for Frontline Ltd. — meaning it keeps 36. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FRO leads at 38. 1% versus 36. 3% for INSW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INSW leads at 42. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FRO or INSW more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Frontline Ltd.
(FRO) trades at 5. 9x forward P/E versus 8. 1x for International Seaways, Inc. — 2. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FRO: 2. 1% to $38. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — FRO or INSW?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Frontline Ltd. (FRO) offers the highest yield at 5. 2%, versus 3. 4% for International Seaways, Inc. (INSW).
09Is FRO or INSW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 43), 3. 4% yield, +970. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (INSW: +970. 0%, FRO: +506. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FRO and INSW?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(FRO: -11.8% · INSW: 37.6%)Net Margin>
%
(FRO: 12.3% · INSW: 36.7%)P/E Ratio<
x
(FRO: 16.9x · INSW: 13.8x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.