FUBO vs FOXA

For growth investors, fuboTV Inc.

(FUBO) is the stronger pick with 67. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 16. 6% for Fox Corporation (FOXA). Fox Corporation (FOXA) offers the better valuation at 12. 8x trailing P/E (13. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate fuboTV Inc. (FUBO) a "Hold" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Fox Corporation (FOXA) delivered a total return of +70.

4%, compared to -94. 8% for fuboTV Inc. (FUBO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FOXA returned +30. 6% versus FUBO's -90. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fox Corporation (FOXA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

54β versus fuboTV Inc. 's 1. 77β — meaning FUBO is approximately 229% more volatile than FOXA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, fuboTV Inc. (FUBO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 25% versus 60% for Fox Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), fuboTV Inc.

(FUBO) is pulling ahead at 67. 7% versus 16. 6% for Fox Corporation (FOXA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: fuboTV Inc. grew EPS 96. 3% year-over-year, compared to 56. 9% for Fox Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, FUBO leads at 39. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Fox Corporation (FOXA) is the more profitable company, earning 13.

9% net margin versus 5. 7% for fuboTV Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FOXA leads at 19. 8% versus -2. 6% for FUBO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FOXA leads at 33. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FUBO: 299.

3% to $43. 00.

In this comparison, FOXA (1.

0% yield) pays a dividend. FUBO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Fox Corporation (FOXA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

54), 1. 0% yield). fuboTV Inc. (FUBO) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FOXA: +30. 6%, FUBO: -90. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

FOXA pays a dividend while FUBO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.