FUSE
Fusemachines Inc.
Software - Application
Market Cap$37M
5Y Perf.-88.6%
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisFUSE
AIOT
Try popular comparisons:
Stock Comparison
FUSE vs AIOT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
AIOT
PowerFleet, Inc.
Communication Equipment
Market Cap$523M
5Y Perf.-16.0%
FUSE vs AIOT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot |  FUSE |  AIOT |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $37M | $523M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10M | $436M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $262K | $-32M |
| Gross Margin | 54.8% | 55.2% |
| Operating Margin | -89.5% | 1.7% |
| Total Debt | $1M | $287M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $49M |
FUSE vs AIOT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
FUSE
AIOT
| Stock | Jun 24 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fusemachines Inc. (FUSE) | 100 | 11.4 | -88.6% |
| PowerFleet, Inc. (AIOT) | 100 | 84.0 | -16.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FUSE vs AIOT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: FUSE and AIOT are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. PowerFleet, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FUSE
Fusemachines Inc.
The Income Pick
FUSE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.39
- Lower volatility, beta 1.39, current ratio 0.31x
- Beta 1.39, current ratio 0.31x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
AIOT
PowerFleet, Inc.
The Growth Play
AIOT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 66.3%, EPS growth 60.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 42.2%
- -19.5% 10Y total return vs FUSE's -86.9%
- 66.3% revenue growth vs FUSE's -98.6%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth |  AIOT | 66.3% revenue growth vs FUSE's -98.6% |
| Quality / Margins |  FUSE | 2.7% margin vs AIOT's -7.4% |
| Stability / Safety | FUSE | Beta 1.39 vs AIOT's 2.69 |
| Dividends | AIOT | 19.6% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | AIOT | -16.7% vs FUSE's -89.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | FUSE | 1.4% ROA vs AIOT's -3.4% |
FUSE vs AIOT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2024
FUSE vs AIOT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLAIOTLAGGINGFUSE
FUSEFusemachines Inc.
1leads
AIOTPowerFleet, Inc.
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs FUSEMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
AIOT4/5
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
FUSE4/6
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
AIOT5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AIOT leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AIOT is the larger business by revenue, generating $436M annually — 45.4x FUSE's $10M. FUSE is the more profitable business, keeping 2.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AIOT's -7.4%. On growth, AIOT holds the edge at +47.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | FUSEFusemachines Inc. | AIOTPowerFleet, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10M | $436M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$8M | $69M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $261,897 | -$32M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$8M | $3M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +54.8% | +55.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -89.5% | +1.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.7% | -7.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -82.3% | +0.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.8% | +47.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -25.5% |
AIOT leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FUSE and AIOT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FUSEFusemachines Inc. | AIOTPowerFleet, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $37M | $523M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $34M | $761M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -15.90x | -8.93x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 47.93x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.80x | 1.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.03x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Evenly matched — FUSE and AIOT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FUSE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AIOT scores 3/9 vs FUSE's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | FUSEFusemachines Inc. | AIOTPowerFleet, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -6.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.4% | -3.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -4.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.5% | -5.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.64x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | $238M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $49M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $287M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.49x | 0.47x |
FUSE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AIOT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AIOT five years ago would be worth $8,050 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,314 for FUSE. Over the past 12 months, AIOT leads with a -16.7% total return vs FUSE's -89.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AIOT at -7.0% vs FUSE's -50.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FUSEFusemachines Inc. | AIOTPowerFleet, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -24.7% | -26.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -89.1% | -16.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.8% | -19.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.9% | -19.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.9% | -19.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -50.4% | -7.0% |
AIOT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FUSE and AIOT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FUSE is the less volatile stock with a 1.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AIOT's 2.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AIOT currently trades 65.3% from its 52-week high vs FUSE's 5.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FUSEFusemachines Inc. | AIOTPowerFleet, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.39x | 2.69x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.00 | $5.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.80 | $2.77 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +5.1% | +65.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.0 | 73.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.8M | 1.5M |
Evenly matched — FUSE and AIOT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
AIOT is the only dividend payer here at 19.62% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | FUSEFusemachines Inc. | AIOTPowerFleet, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $8.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +19.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.75 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.5% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
AIOT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). FUSE leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
Best OverallPowerFleet, Inc. (AIOT)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
FUSE vs AIOT: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FUSE or AIOT a better buy right now?
Analysts rate PowerFleet, Inc.
(AIOT) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FUSE or AIOT?
Over the past 5 years, PowerFleet, Inc.
(AIOT) delivered a total return of -19. 5%, compared to -86. 9% for Fusemachines Inc. (FUSE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AIOT returned -19. 5% versus FUSE's -86. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FUSE or AIOT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fusemachines Inc.
(FUSE) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 39β versus PowerFleet, Inc. 's 2. 69β — meaning AIOT is approximately 94% more volatile than FUSE relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — FUSE or AIOT?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fusemachines Inc.
grew EPS 86. 1% year-over-year, compared to 60. 6% for PowerFleet, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AIOT leads at 42. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — FUSE or AIOT?
Fusemachines Inc.
(FUSE) is the more profitable company, earning -12. 0% net margin versus -14. 1% for PowerFleet, Inc. — meaning it keeps -12. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AIOT leads at -7. 1% versus -77. 2% for FUSE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FUSE leads at 55. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — FUSE or AIOT?
In this comparison, AIOT (19.
6% yield) pays a dividend. FUSE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is FUSE or AIOT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PowerFleet, Inc.
(AIOT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (19. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AIOT: -19. 5%, FUSE: -86. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between FUSE and AIOT?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FUSE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AIOT is a small-cap income-oriented stock. AIOT pays a dividend while FUSE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.