Communication Equipment
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AIOT vs TRAK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
AIOT vs TRAK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $453M | $185M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $436M | $24M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-32M | $7M |
| Gross Margin | 55.2% | 85.0% |
| Operating Margin | 1.7% | 30.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 27.9x |
| Total Debt | $287M | $510K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $49M | $29M |
AIOT vs TRAK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PowerFleet, Inc. (AIOT) | 100 | 72.9 | -27.1% |
| ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK) | 100 | 66.5 | -33.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AIOT vs TRAK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AIOT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.70, yield 22.6%
- Rev growth 66.3%, EPS growth 60.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 42.2%
- 66.3% revenue growth vs TRAK's 10.5%
TRAK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 21.4% 10Y total return vs AIOT's -30.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.15, Low D/E 1.0%, current ratio 6.09x
- Beta 1.15, yield 0.9%, current ratio 6.09x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 66.3% revenue growth vs TRAK's 10.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.9% margin vs AIOT's -7.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.15 vs AIOT's 2.70, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 22.6% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs TRAK's 0.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -34.4% vs TRAK's -53.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.9% ROA vs AIOT's -3.4%, ROIC 21.4% vs -4.3% |
AIOT vs TRAK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AIOT vs TRAK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRAK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AIOT is the larger business by revenue, generating $436M annually — 18.5x TRAK's $24M. TRAK is the more profitable business, keeping 30.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AIOT's -7.4%. On growth, AIOT holds the edge at +47.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $436M | $24M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $69M | $8M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$32M | $7M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3M | $7M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.2% | +85.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.7% | +30.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.4% | +30.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.6% | +29.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +47.4% | +6.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -25.5% | +13.2% |
Valuation Metrics
AIOT leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, TRAK's 21.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AIOT's 43.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $453M | $185M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $692M | $157M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.74x | 29.06x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 27.86x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.85x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 43.56x | 21.01x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.25x | 8.19x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.89x | 3.93x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 22.04x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TRAK leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRAK delivers a 14.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-7 for AIOT. TRAK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AIOT's 0.64x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TRAK scores 7/9 vs AIOT's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -6.6% | +14.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.4% | +12.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.3% | +21.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.1% | +12.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.64x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $238M | -$28M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $49M | $29M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $287M | $509,973 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.47x | 165.50x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRAK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRAK five years ago would be worth $19,972 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,981 for AIOT. Over the past 12 months, AIOT leads with a -34.4% total return vs TRAK's -53.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRAK at 18.0% vs AIOT's -11.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -36.6% | -13.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -34.4% | -53.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -30.2% | +64.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -30.2% | +99.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -30.2% | +21.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -11.3% | +18.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AIOT and TRAK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TRAK is the less volatile stock with a 1.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AIOT's 2.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AIOT currently trades 54.9% from its 52-week high vs TRAK's 42.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.70x | 1.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.07 | $23.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.77 | $6.94 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +54.9% | +42.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.2 | 70.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 163K |
Analyst Outlook
AIOT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AIOT as "Buy" and TRAK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 140.2% upside for AIOT (target: $8) vs 136.0% for TRAK (target: $24). For income investors, AIOT offers the higher dividend yield at 22.62% vs TRAK's 0.85%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.00 | $24.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +22.6% | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.75 | $0.09 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +1.7% |
TRAK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AIOT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
AIOT vs TRAK: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AIOT or TRAK a better buy right now?
ReposiTrak, Inc.
(TRAK) offers the better valuation at 29. 1x trailing P/E (27. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PowerFleet, Inc. (AIOT) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — AIOT or TRAK?
Over the past 5 years, ReposiTrak, Inc.
(TRAK) delivered a total return of +99. 7%, compared to -30. 2% for PowerFleet, Inc. (AIOT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRAK returned +21. 4% versus AIOT's -30. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — AIOT or TRAK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ReposiTrak, Inc.
(TRAK) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 15β versus PowerFleet, Inc. 's 2. 70β — meaning AIOT is approximately 134% more volatile than TRAK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 64% for PowerFleet, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — AIOT or TRAK?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PowerFleet, Inc.
grew EPS 60. 6% year-over-year, compared to 20. 7% for ReposiTrak, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AIOT leads at 42. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — AIOT or TRAK?
ReposiTrak, Inc.
(TRAK) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 9% net margin versus -14. 1% for PowerFleet, Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRAK leads at 27. 5% versus -7. 1% for AIOT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRAK leads at 83. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is AIOT or TRAK more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AIOT: 140.
2% to $8. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — AIOT or TRAK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
PowerFleet, Inc. (AIOT) offers the highest yield at 22. 6%, versus 0. 9% for ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK).
08Is AIOT or TRAK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ReposiTrak, Inc.
(TRAK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 15), 0. 9% yield). PowerFleet, Inc. (AIOT) carries a higher beta of 2. 70 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRAK: +21. 4%, AIOT: -30. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between AIOT and TRAK?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AIOT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; TRAK is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.