Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
FVCB logo
FVCB
MNSB logo
MNSB
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FVCB vs MNSB

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FVCB
FVCBankcorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$302M
5Y Perf.+95.0%
MNSB
MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$184M
5Y Perf.+88.9%

FVCB vs MNSB — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FVCB logoFVCB
MNSB logoMNSB
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - Regional
Market Cap$302M$184M
Revenue (TTM)$120M$135M
Net Income (TTM)$22M$16M
Gross Margin53.1%54.3%
Operating Margin23.6%14.1%
Forward P/E11.4x11.0x
Total Debt$25M$70M
Cash & Equiv.$6M$26M

FVCB vs MNSBLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FVCB
MNSB
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
FVCBankcorp, Inc. (FVCB)100195.0+95.0%
MainStreet Bancshar… (MNSB)100188.9+88.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FVCB vs MNSB

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FVCB leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇FVCB emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
FVCB
FVCBankcorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

FVCB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.60, yield 0.7%
  • Rev growth 9.4%, EPS growth 47.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.60, Low D/E 10.0%, current ratio 0.14x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
MNSB
MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

MNSB is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and bank quality.

  • 135.4% 10Y total return vs FVCB's 84.8%
  • NIM 3.1% vs FVCB's 2.8%
  • Lower P/E (11.0x vs 11.4x)
Best for: long-term compounding and bank quality
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFVCB logoFVCB9.4% NII/revenue growth vs MNSB's -1.4%
ValueMNSB logoMNSBLower P/E (11.0x vs 11.4x)
Quality / MarginsFVCB logoFVCBEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs MNSB's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyFVCB logoFVCBBeta 0.60 vs MNSB's 0.60, lower leverage
DividendsFVCB logoFVCB0.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs MNSB's 1.6%
Momentum (1Y)FVCB logoFVCB+49.1% vs MNSB's +37.2%
Efficiency (ROA)FVCB logoFVCBEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs MNSB's 0.4%

FVCB vs MNSB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FVCBFVCBankcorp, Inc.
FY 2025
Service Charges On Deposit Accounts
71.4%$1M
Fees Exchange And Other Service Charges
28.6%$500,000
MNSBMainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
FY 2025
Core Banking Segment
100.0%$134M

FVCB vs MNSB — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFVCBLAGGINGMNSB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FVCB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

MNSB and FVCB operate at a comparable scale, with $135M and $120M in trailing revenue. FVCB is the more profitable business, keeping 18.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MNSB's 11.5%.

MetricFVCB logoFVCBFVCBankcorp, Inc.MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$120M$135M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$29M$23M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$22M$16M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$24M$11M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+53.1%+54.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+23.6%+14.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+18.4%+11.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+19.9%+7.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+14.8%+120.9%
FVCB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — FVCB and MNSB each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 13.9x trailing earnings, FVCB trades at a 2% valuation discount to MNSB's 14.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FVCB's 11.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MNSB's 11.9x.

MetricFVCB logoFVCBFVCBankcorp, Inc.MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…
Market CapShares × price$302M$184M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$321M$227M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS13.88x14.16x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.11.38x11.03x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.11x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.38x11.90x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.47x1.35x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.21x0.87x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF12.65x17.26x
Evenly matched — FVCB and MNSB each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FVCB leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

FVCB delivers a 8.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $7 for MNSB. FVCB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MNSB's 0.32x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FVCB scores 9/9 vs MNSB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFVCB logoFVCBFVCBankcorp, Inc.MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+8.9%+7.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.0%+0.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+7.2%+5.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+3.9%+6.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–995
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.10x0.32x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$20M$43M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$6M$26M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$25M$70M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.52x0.31x
FVCB leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FVCB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FVCB five years ago would be worth $12,119 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,813 for MNSB. Over the past 12 months, FVCB leads with a +49.1% total return vs MNSB's +37.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FVCB at 18.3% vs MNSB's 4.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFVCB logoFVCBFVCBankcorp, Inc.MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+21.2%+26.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+49.1%+37.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+65.8%+13.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+21.2%+18.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+84.8%+135.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+18.3%+4.2%
FVCB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — FVCB and MNSB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

FVCB is the less volatile stock with a 0.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MNSB's 0.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MNSB currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs FVCB's 91.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFVCB logoFVCBFVCBankcorp, Inc.MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.60x0.60x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$18.41$25.17
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$11.13$17.86
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+91.2%+99.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10069.065.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded205K45K
Evenly matched — FVCB and MNSB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — FVCB and MNSB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates FVCB as "Buy" and MNSB as "Hold". For income investors, MNSB offers the higher dividend yield at 1.60% vs FVCB's 0.71%.

MetricFVCB logoFVCBFVCBankcorp, Inc.MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$19.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts31
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.7%+1.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises10
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.12$0.40
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.2%+2.4%
Evenly matched — FVCB and MNSB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FVCB leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.

Best OverallFVCBankcorp, Inc. (FVCB)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FVCB vs MNSB: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FVCB or MNSB a better buy right now?

For growth investors, FVCBankcorp, Inc.

(FVCB) is the stronger pick with 9. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). FVCBankcorp, Inc. (FVCB) offers the better valuation at 13. 9x trailing P/E (11. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate FVCBankcorp, Inc. (FVCB) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FVCB or MNSB?

On trailing P/E, FVCBankcorp, Inc.

(FVCB) is the cheapest at 13. 9x versus MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. at 14. 2x. On forward P/E, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FVCB or MNSB?

Over the past 5 years, FVCBankcorp, Inc.

(FVCB) delivered a total return of +21. 2%, compared to +18. 1% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MNSB returned +135. 4% versus FVCB's +84. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FVCB or MNSB?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), FVCBankcorp, Inc.

(FVCB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 60β versus MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. 's 0. 60β — meaning MNSB is approximately 0% more volatile than FVCB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FVCBankcorp, Inc. (FVCB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 32% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FVCB or MNSB?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), FVCBankcorp, Inc.

(FVCB) is pulling ahead at 9. 4% versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 210. 0% year-over-year, compared to 47. 6% for FVCBankcorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FVCB or MNSB?

FVCBankcorp, Inc.

(FVCB) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 1% net margin versus 11. 5% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FVCB leads at 23. 1% versus 14. 0% for MNSB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MNSB leads at 54. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FVCB or MNSB more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.

(MNSB) trades at 11. 0x forward P/E versus 11. 4x for FVCBankcorp, Inc. — 0. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FVCB or MNSB?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB) offers the highest yield at 1. 6%, versus 0. 7% for FVCBankcorp, Inc. (FVCB).

09

Is FVCB or MNSB better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.

(MNSB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 60), 1. 6% yield, +135. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MNSB: +135. 4%, FVCB: +84. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FVCB and MNSB?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.