Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Formula One Group (FWONK) vs Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) vs The Walt Disney Company (DIS) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | NFLX | 15.9% revenue growth vs FWONK's -100.0% |
| Value | DIS | Lower P/E (16.1x vs 30.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | FWONK | 43.8% net margin vs DIS's 12.8% |
| Stability / Safety | FWONK | Beta 0.51 vs DIS's 1.10 |
| Dividends | DIS | 0.9% yield; 1-year raise streak; FWONK, NFLX pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | NFLX | -1.9% vs DIS's -5.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | FWONK | 42.6% ROA vs DIS's 6.1% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Formula One Group is the commercial rights holder for the global Formula 1 motorsport championship. It generates revenue primarily from race promotion fees (about 30%), media rights sales (about 35%), and sponsorship deals (about 20%), with the remainder from hospitality and other sources. Its key moat is the exclusive, long-term commercial rights to the world's premier motorsport series — a globally recognized brand with high barriers to entry.
Netflix is a global streaming entertainment service that offers original and licensed TV shows, movies, and documentaries. It generates revenue primarily through subscription fees — with three pricing tiers — and earns additional income from licensing its original content to other platforms. Its key advantage is its massive scale and data-driven content creation, which allows it to invest billions in programming that attracts and retains subscribers worldwide.
The Walt Disney Company is a global entertainment conglomerate that creates and distributes content across film, television, and streaming platforms while operating theme parks and consumer products. It generates revenue primarily through its media networks and streaming services (Disney+, ESPN+, Hulu) — roughly 60% of revenue — and its parks, experiences, and products segment — about 30% of revenue. Disney's key competitive advantage is its unparalleled portfolio of iconic intellectual property — including Marvel, Star Wars, Pixar, and Disney classics — which drives cross-platform monetization and creates a powerful content flywheel.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 3 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
NFLX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). DIS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
DIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $95.7B annually — 93.5x FWONK's $1.0B. FWONK is the more profitable business, keeping 43.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DIS's 12.8%. On growth, NFLX holds the edge at +17.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | FWONKFormula One Group | NFLXNetflix, Inc. | DISThe Walt Disney C… |
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $45.2B | $95.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $231M | $30.1B | $19.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $449M | $11.0B | $12.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $279M | $9.5B | $7.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -18.4% | +48.5% | +37.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.4% | +29.5% | +14.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +43.8% | +24.3% | +12.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +27.3% | +20.9% | +7.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.6% | +17.6% | +5.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | +31.1% | -4.3% |
Valuation Metrics
At 15.5x trailing earnings, DIS trades at a 59% valuation discount to NFLX's 38.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, DIS's 12.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NFLX's 13.7x.
| Metric | FWONKFormula One Group | NFLXNetflix, Inc. | DISThe Walt Disney C… |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $20.4B | $407.8B | $189.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $19.4B | $413.2B | $229.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | 38.04x | 15.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 52.13x | 30.75x | 16.09x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.15x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 13.74x | 11.96x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 9.03x | 2.01x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 15.61x | 1.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.48x | 43.10x | 18.85x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $11 for DIS. DIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.39x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NFLX's 0.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DIS scores 8/9 vs FWONK's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | FWONKFormula One Group | NFLXNetflix, Inc. | DISThe Walt Disney C… |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +41.3% | +10.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +42.6% | +19.8% | +6.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +29.8% | +6.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.5% | +30.5% | +8.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.54x | 0.39x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.1B | $5.4B | $39.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.1B | $9.0B | $5.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $14.5B | $44.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.35x | 17.33x | 7.86x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in FWONK five years ago would be worth $20,766 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,567 for DIS. Over the past 12 months, NFLX leads with a -1.9% total return vs DIS's -5.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 44.0% vs DIS's 2.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FWONKFormula One Group | NFLXNetflix, Inc. | DISThe Walt Disney C… |
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.6% | +5.8% | -5.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -5.0% | -1.9% | -5.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.1% | +198.8% | +9.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +107.7% | +74.8% | -44.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +269.5% | +930.4% | +20.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.6% | +44.0% | +2.9% |
Risk & Volatility
FWONK is the less volatile stock with a 0.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DIS's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DIS currently trades 85.0% from its 52-week high vs NFLX's 71.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FWONKFormula One Group | NFLXNetflix, Inc. | DISThe Walt Disney C… |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.51x | 0.76x | 1.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $109.36 | $134.12 | $124.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $75.26 | $75.01 | $80.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.8% | +71.8% | +85.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.7 | 55.8 | 45.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 38.8M | 9.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FWONK as "Buy", NFLX as "Buy", DIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.4% upside for DIS (target: $139) vs 21.8% for NFLX (target: $117). DIS is the only dividend payer here at 0.94% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | FWONKFormula One Group | NFLXNetflix, Inc. | DISThe Walt Disney C… |
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $119.25 | $117.25 | $139.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 97 | 63 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.2% | +1.8% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Formula One Group (FWONK) | 100 | 230.64 | +130.6% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 227.3 | +127.3% |
| The Walt Disney Com… (DIS) | 100 | 110.04 | +10.0% |
Formula One Group (FWONK) returned +108% over 5 years vs The Walt Disney Com… (DIS)'s -44%. A $10,000 investment in FWONK 5 years ago would be worth $20,766 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Formula One Group (FWONK) | $0.00 | $0.00 | — |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | $8.8B | $45.2B | +411.7% |
| The Walt Disney Com… (DIS) | $55.6B | $94.4B | +69.7% |
Formula One Group's revenue grew from $0M (2016) to $0M (2025) — a 0.0% CAGR. Netflix, Inc.'s revenue grew from $8.8B (2016) to $45.2B (2025) — a 19.9% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Formula One Group (FWONK) | 14.3% | -0.8% | -105.7% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 2.1% | 24.3% | +1049.7% |
| The Walt Disney Com… (DIS) | 16.9% | 13.1% | -22.2% |
Netflix, Inc.'s net margin went from 2% (2016) to 24% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Formula One Group (FWONK) | 27.8 | 101.8 | +266.2% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 153.6 | 37.1 | -75.8% |
| The Walt Disney Com… (DIS) | 18.9 | 16.6 | -12.2% |
Formula One Group has traded in a 27x–102x P/E range over 3 years; current trailing P/E is ~102x. Netflix, Inc. has traded in a 30x–154x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~38x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Formula One Group (FWONK) | 1.02 | 0 | -100.0% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 0.04 | 2.53 | +5783.7% |
| The Walt Disney Com… (DIS) | 5.73 | 6.85 | +19.5% |
Formula One Group's EPS grew from $1.02 (2016) to $0.00 (2025) — a -100% CAGR. Netflix, Inc.'s EPS grew from $0.04 (2016) to $2.53 (2025) — a 57% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Formula One Group generated $908M FCF in 2025 (+96% vs 2021). Netflix, Inc. generated $9B FCF in 2025 (+7269% vs 2021).
FWONK vs NFLX vs DIS: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FWONK or NFLX or DIS a better buy right now?
The Walt Disney Company (DIS) offers the better valuation at 15.5x trailing P/E (16.1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Formula One Group (FWONK) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FWONK or NFLX or DIS?
On trailing P/E, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) is the cheapest at 15.5x versus Netflix, Inc. at 38.0x. On forward P/E, The Walt Disney Company is actually cheaper at 16.1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FWONK or NFLX or DIS?
Over the past 5 years, Formula One Group (FWONK) delivered a total return of +107.7%, compared to -44.3% for The Walt Disney Company (DIS). A $10,000 investment in FWONK five years ago would be worth approximately $21K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +930.4% versus DIS's +20.5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FWONK or NFLX or DIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Formula One Group (FWONK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.51β versus The Walt Disney Company's 1.10β — meaning DIS is approximately 117% more volatile than FWONK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 39% versus 54% for Netflix, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — FWONK or NFLX or DIS?
Formula One Group (FWONK) is the more profitable company, earning 43.8% net margin versus 13.1% for The Walt Disney Company — meaning it keeps 43.8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29.5% versus -3.4% for FWONK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NFLX leads at 48.5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is FWONK or NFLX or DIS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) trades at 16.1x forward P/E versus 52.1x for Formula One Group — 36.0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DIS: 31.4% to $139.33.
07Which pays a better dividend — FWONK or NFLX or DIS?
In this comparison, DIS (0.9% yield) pays a dividend. FWONK, NFLX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is FWONK or NFLX or DIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.76), +930.4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +930.4%, DIS: +20.5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between FWONK and NFLX and DIS?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: FWONK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NFLX is a large-cap quality compounder stock; DIS is a mid-cap deep-value stock. DIS pays a dividend while FWONK, NFLX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.