Railroads
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GBX vs WAB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Railroads
GBX vs WAB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Railroads | Railroads |
| Market Cap | $1.56B | $45.90B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.06B | $11.51B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $185M | $1.21B |
| Gross Margin | 17.3% | 33.8% |
| Operating Margin | 9.4% | 16.1% |
| Forward P/E | 16.0x | 25.5x |
| Total Debt | $1.84B | $5.54B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $326M | $789M |
GBX vs WAB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Greenbrier Comp… (GBX) | 100 | 237.3 | +137.3% |
| Westinghouse Air Br… (WAB) | 100 | 442.9 | +342.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GBX vs WAB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GBX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.97, yield 2.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.97, current ratio 2.80x
- PEG 0.47 vs WAB's 0.99
WAB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 7.5%, EPS growth 13.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.1%
- 248.4% 10Y total return vs GBX's 125.9%
- 7.5% revenue growth vs GBX's -8.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.5% revenue growth vs GBX's -8.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.0x vs 25.5x), PEG 0.47 vs 0.99 | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.5% margin vs GBX's 6.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.97 vs WAB's 1.11 | |
| Dividends | 2.4% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs WAB's 0.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.5% vs GBX's +18.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.6% ROA vs GBX's 4.3%, ROIC 9.6% vs 7.6% |
GBX vs WAB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GBX vs WAB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WAB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WAB is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.5B annually — 3.8x GBX's $3.1B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 10.5% (WAB) to 6.0% (GBX). On growth, WAB holds the edge at +13.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.1B | $11.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $413M | $2.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $185M | $1.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $123M | $1.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +17.3% | +33.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.4% | +16.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.0% | +10.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.0% | +14.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -19.3% | +13.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -33.7% | +12.8% |
Valuation Metrics
GBX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.9x trailing earnings, GBX trades at a 80% valuation discount to WAB's 39.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GBX offers better value at 0.23x vs WAB's 1.54x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $45.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.1B | $50.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.93x | 39.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.99x | 25.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.23x | 1.54x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.68x | 21.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.48x | 4.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.93x | 4.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 30.62x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WAB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WAB delivers a 10.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $11 for GBX. WAB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.50x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GBX's 1.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GBX scores 8/9 vs WAB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.7% | +10.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.3% | +5.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.6% | +9.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.1% | +11.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.06x | 0.50x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.5B | $4.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $326M | $789M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.8B | $5.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.87x | 7.41x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WAB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WAB five years ago would be worth $33,591 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,644 for GBX. Over the past 12 months, WAB leads with a +43.5% total return vs GBX's +18.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WAB at 40.1% vs GBX's 26.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.9% | +25.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.6% | +43.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +102.6% | +174.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.4% | +235.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +125.9% | +248.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.5% | +40.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GBX and WAB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GBX is the less volatile stock with a 0.97 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WAB's 1.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WAB currently trades 98.1% from its 52-week high vs GBX's 85.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.97x | 1.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $59.19 | $275.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $38.23 | $184.26 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.1% | +98.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.6 | 52.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 406K | 902K |
Analyst Outlook
GBX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates GBX as "Buy" and WAB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.6% upside for WAB (target: $291) vs -2.7% for GBX (target: $49). For income investors, GBX offers the higher dividend yield at 2.45% vs WAB's 0.37%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $49.00 | $291.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.4% | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 12 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.23 | $1.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.5% | +0.5% |
WAB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GBX leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
GBX vs WAB: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GBX or WAB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) is the stronger pick with 7.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 7% for The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. (GBX). The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. (GBX) offers the better valuation at 7. 9x trailing P/E (16. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. (GBX) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GBX or WAB?
On trailing P/E, The Greenbrier Companies, Inc.
(GBX) is the cheapest at 7. 9x versus Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation at 39. 6x. On forward P/E, The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. wins at 0. 47x versus Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation's 0. 99x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GBX or WAB?
Over the past 5 years, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) delivered a total return of +235.
9%, compared to +16. 4% for The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. (GBX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WAB returned +248. 4% versus GBX's +125. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GBX or WAB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Greenbrier Companies, Inc.
(GBX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 97β versus Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation's 1. 11β — meaning WAB is approximately 15% more volatile than GBX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 50% versus 106% for The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GBX or WAB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) is pulling ahead at 7.
5% versus -8. 7% for The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. (GBX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. grew EPS 28. 0% year-over-year, compared to 13. 1% for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, WAB leads at 10. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GBX or WAB?
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) is the more profitable company, earning 10.
5% net margin versus 6. 3% for The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WAB leads at 16. 7% versus 10. 4% for GBX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WAB leads at 31. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GBX or WAB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. (GBX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 47x versus Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation's 0. 99x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. (GBX) trades at 16. 0x forward P/E versus 25. 5x for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation — 9. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WAB: 7. 6% to $291. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — GBX or WAB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. (GBX) offers the highest yield at 2. 4%, versus 0. 4% for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB).
09Is GBX or WAB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Greenbrier Companies, Inc.
(GBX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 97), 2. 4% yield, +125. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GBX: +125. 9%, WAB: +248. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GBX and WAB?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GBX is a small-cap deep-value stock; WAB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. GBX pays a dividend while WAB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.