Apparel - Retail
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GCO vs SCVL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Apparel - Retail
GCO vs SCVL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail |
| Market Cap | $374M | $495M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.38B | $1.14B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $39K | $58M |
| Gross Margin | 46.6% | 36.5% |
| Operating Margin | 0.5% | 6.1% |
| Forward P/E | 26.1x | 9.5x |
| Total Debt | $485M | $368M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $34M | $109M |
GCO vs SCVL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Genesco Inc. (GCO) | 100 | 187.3 | +87.3% |
| Shoe Carnival, Inc. (SCVL) | 100 | 139.2 | +39.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GCO vs SCVL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GCO is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +74.6% vs SCVL's +8.7%
SCVL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.45, yield 3.0%
- Rev growth 2.3%, EPS growth 0.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -3.3%
- 67.9% 10Y total return vs GCO's -47.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.3% revenue growth vs GCO's 0.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.5x vs 26.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.1% margin vs GCO's 0.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.45 vs GCO's 1.99, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +74.6% vs SCVL's +8.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.9% ROA vs GCO's 0.0%, ROIC 7.8% vs 1.0% |
GCO vs SCVL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GCO vs SCVL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — GCO and SCVL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GCO is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.4B annually — 2.1x SCVL's $1.1B. SCVL is the more profitable business, keeping 5.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GCO's 0.0%. On growth, GCO holds the edge at +3.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.4B | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $21M | $96M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $39,000 | $58M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $23M | $31M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +46.6% | +36.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.5% | +6.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.0% | +5.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.0% | +2.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.3% | -3.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +128.4% | -24.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — GCO and SCVL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, SCVL's 6.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GCO's 12.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $374M | $495M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $825M | $755M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -19.24x | 6.75x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 26.09x | 9.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.52x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.43x | 6.17x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.16x | 0.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.69x | 0.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.00x | 7.13x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SCVL leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SCVL delivers a 8.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $0 for GCO. SCVL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.57x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GCO's 0.89x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.0% | +8.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.0% | +4.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.0% | +7.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.4% | +9.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.89x | 0.57x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $451M | $259M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $34M | $109M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $485M | $368M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.96x | 329.89x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GCO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GCO five years ago would be worth $6,584 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,525 for SCVL. Over the past 12 months, GCO leads with a +74.6% total return vs SCVL's +8.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GCO at 3.3% vs SCVL's -4.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +40.1% | +5.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +74.6% | +8.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.4% | -13.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.2% | -34.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.2% | +67.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.3% | -4.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GCO and SCVL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SCVL is the less volatile stock with a 1.45 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GCO's 1.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GCO currently trades 88.9% from its 52-week high vs SCVL's 68.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.99x | 1.45x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $38.95 | $26.57 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.18 | $15.04 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.9% | +68.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.5 | 45.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 239K | 407K |
Analyst Outlook
SCVL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates GCO as "Hold" and SCVL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.6% upside for SCVL (target: $22) vs 4.6% for GCO (target: $36). SCVL is the only dividend payer here at 2.95% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $36.25 | $22.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 21 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.53 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.6% | 0.0% |
SCVL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). GCO leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
GCO vs SCVL: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GCO or SCVL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Shoe Carnival, Inc.
(SCVL) is the stronger pick with 2. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 0% for Genesco Inc. (GCO). Shoe Carnival, Inc. (SCVL) offers the better valuation at 6. 8x trailing P/E (9. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Genesco Inc. (GCO) a "Hold" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GCO or SCVL?
On forward P/E, Shoe Carnival, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 9. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GCO or SCVL?
Over the past 5 years, Genesco Inc.
(GCO) delivered a total return of -34. 2%, compared to -34. 8% for Shoe Carnival, Inc. (SCVL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SCVL returned +67. 9% versus GCO's -47. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GCO or SCVL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Shoe Carnival, Inc.
(SCVL) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 45β versus Genesco Inc. 's 1. 99β — meaning GCO is approximately 38% more volatile than SCVL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Shoe Carnival, Inc. (SCVL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 57% versus 89% for Genesco Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GCO or SCVL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shoe Carnival, Inc.
(SCVL) is pulling ahead at 2. 3% versus 0. 0% for Genesco Inc. (GCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Shoe Carnival, Inc. grew EPS 0. 0% year-over-year, compared to -20. 0% for Genesco Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GCO leads at -1. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GCO or SCVL?
Shoe Carnival, Inc.
(SCVL) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 1% net margin versus -0. 8% for Genesco Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SCVL leads at 7. 6% versus 0. 6% for GCO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GCO leads at 47. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GCO or SCVL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Shoe Carnival, Inc.
(SCVL) trades at 9. 5x forward P/E versus 26. 1x for Genesco Inc. — 16. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SCVL: 21. 6% to $22. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — GCO or SCVL?
In this comparison, SCVL (3.
0% yield) pays a dividend. GCO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GCO or SCVL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Shoe Carnival, Inc.
(SCVL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (3. 0% yield). Genesco Inc. (GCO) carries a higher beta of 1. 99 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SCVL: +67. 9%, GCO: -47. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GCO and SCVL?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GCO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SCVL is a small-cap deep-value stock. SCVL pays a dividend while GCO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.