GECCI
Great Elm Capital Corp. 8.50% Notes DUE 2029
Asset Management
Market Cap$354M
5Y Perf.+2.0%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
GECCI vs PFLT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
PFLT
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
Asset Management
Market Cap$888M
5Y Perf.-21.3%
GECCI vs PFLT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | GECCI | PFLT |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $354M | $888M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $31M | $172M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $18M | $118M |
| Gross Margin | 93.5% | 45.6% |
| Operating Margin | 88.3% | 39.4% |
| Forward P/E | 20.0x | 7.9x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $1.78B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $0.00 | $123M |
GECCI vs PFLT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
GECCI
PFLT
| Stock | Apr 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Great Elm Capital C… (GECCI) | 100 | 102.0 | +2.0% |
| PennantPark Floatin… (PFLT) | 100 | 78.7 | -21.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GECCI vs PFLT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: GECCI leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
GECCI
Great Elm Capital Corp. 8.50% Notes DUE 2029
The Banking Pick
GECCI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.58
- Beta 0.58, yield 0.2%
- Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs PFLT's 0.1% (lower = leaner)
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
PFLT
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
The Banking Pick
PFLT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.79, yield 13.5%
- Rev growth 2.2%, EPS growth -48.6%
- 72.6% 10Y total return vs GECCI's 19.4%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | PFLT | 2.2% NII/revenue growth vs GECCI's -1.7% |
| Value | PFLT | Lower P/E (7.9x vs 20.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | GECCI | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs PFLT's 0.1% (lower = leaner) |
| Stability / Safety | GECCI | Beta 0.58 vs PFLT's 0.79 |
| Dividends | PFLT | 13.5% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs GECCI's 0.2% |
| Momentum (1Y) | GECCI | +8.8% vs PFLT's +1.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | GECCI | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs PFLT's 0.1% |
GECCI vs PFLT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLGECCILAGGINGPFLT
PFLTPennantPark Floating …
2leads
GECCIGreat Elm Capital Cor…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs PFLTMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
GECCI3/4
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
PFLT3/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
GECCI7/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
GECCI5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
GECCI2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
PFLT2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GECCI leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PFLT is the larger business by revenue, generating $172M annually — 5.5x GECCI's $31M. GECCI is the more profitable business, keeping 57.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PFLT's 38.7%.
| Metric | GECCIGreat Elm Capital… | PFLTPennantPark Float… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $31M | $172M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $68M | $39M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $18M | $118M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $242M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +93.5% | +45.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +88.3% | +39.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +57.7% | +38.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.1% | +55.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +40.9% |
GECCI leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
PFLT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, GECCI's 5.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PFLT's 37.7x.
| Metric | GECCIGreat Elm Capital… | PFLTPennantPark Float… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $354M | $888M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $354M | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -9.84x | 12.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.97x | 7.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.40x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.21x | 37.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 11.42x | 5.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 21.09x | 0.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.34x |
PFLT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GECCI leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GECCI delivers a 16.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $11 for PFLT. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PFLT scores 4/9 vs GECCI's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | GECCIGreat Elm Capital… | PFLTPennantPark Float… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.8% | +11.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.6% | +4.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +136.1% | +2.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +59.8% | +2.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.65x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $0 | $1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $0 | $123M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $1.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.49x | 0.35x |
GECCI leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GECCI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GECCI five years ago would be worth $11,940 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,718 for PFLT. Over the past 12 months, GECCI leads with a +8.8% total return vs PFLT's +1.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GECCI at 6.1% vs PFLT's 5.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | GECCIGreat Elm Capital… | PFLTPennantPark Float… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.7% | -0.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +8.8% | +1.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.4% | +18.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.4% | +17.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.4% | +72.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.1% | +5.7% |
GECCI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GECCI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GECCI is the less volatile stock with a 0.58 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PFLT's 0.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GECCI currently trades 94.0% from its 52-week high vs PFLT's 82.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | GECCIGreat Elm Capital… | PFLTPennantPark Float… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.58x | 0.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.93 | $10.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.88 | $7.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.0% | +82.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.3 | 68.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2K | 987K |
GECCI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
PFLT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, PFLT offers the higher dividend yield at 13.47% vs GECCI's 0.22%.
| Metric | GECCIGreat Elm Capital… | PFLTPennantPark Float… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $10.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | +13.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.06 | $1.21 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
PFLT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
GECCI leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PFLT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
Best OverallGreat Elm Capital Corp. 8.5… (GECCI)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
GECCI vs PFLT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GECCI or PFLT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
(PFLT) is the stronger pick with 2. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 7% for Great Elm Capital Corp. 8. 50% Notes DUE 2029 (GECCI). PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT) offers the better valuation at 12. 4x trailing P/E (7. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GECCI or PFLT?
On forward P/E, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
is actually cheaper at 7. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GECCI or PFLT?
Over the past 5 years, Great Elm Capital Corp.
8. 50% Notes DUE 2029 (GECCI) delivered a total return of +19. 4%, compared to +17. 2% for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PFLT returned +72. 6% versus GECCI's +19. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GECCI or PFLT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Great Elm Capital Corp.
8. 50% Notes DUE 2029 (GECCI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 58β versus PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. 's 0. 79β — meaning PFLT is approximately 37% more volatile than GECCI relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — GECCI or PFLT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
(PFLT) is pulling ahead at 2. 2% versus -1. 7% for Great Elm Capital Corp. 8. 50% Notes DUE 2029 (GECCI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. grew EPS -48. 6% year-over-year, compared to -813. 9% for Great Elm Capital Corp. 8. 50% Notes DUE 2029. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GECCI or PFLT?
Great Elm Capital Corp.
8. 50% Notes DUE 2029 (GECCI) is the more profitable company, earning 57. 7% net margin versus 38. 7% for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. — meaning it keeps 57. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GECCI leads at 88. 3% versus 39. 4% for PFLT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GECCI leads at 93. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GECCI or PFLT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
(PFLT) trades at 7. 9x forward P/E versus 20. 0x for Great Elm Capital Corp. 8. 50% Notes DUE 2029 — 12. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — GECCI or PFLT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT) offers the highest yield at 13. 5%, versus 0. 2% for Great Elm Capital Corp. 8. 50% Notes DUE 2029 (GECCI).
09Is GECCI or PFLT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
(PFLT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 79), 13. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PFLT: +72. 6%, GECCI: +19. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GECCI and PFLT?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GECCI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PFLT is a small-cap deep-value stock. PFLT pays a dividend while GECCI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(GECCI: -1.7% · PFLT: 2.2%)Net Margin>
%
(GECCI: 57.7% · PFLT: 38.7%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Closest Rival
Compare PFLT vs ARCC
ARCC is one of the most direct listed alternatives to PFLT.
Closest Rival
Compare GECCI vs TPVG
TPVG is one of the most direct listed alternatives to GECCI.
Expand Peer Set
Expand With ARCC + TPVG
ARCC and TPVG are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.