GHC
Graham Holdings Company
Education & Training Services
Market Cap$4.90B
5Y Perf.+214.8%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
GHC vs NWS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
NWS
News Corporation
Entertainment
Market Cap$16.89B
5Y Perf.+151.6%
GHC vs NWS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | GHC | NWS |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Education & Training Services | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $4.90B | $16.89B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.75B | $8.80B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $298M | $1.05B |
| Gross Margin | 27.7% | 13.9% |
| Operating Margin | 7.1% | 9.4% |
| Forward P/E | 17.0x | 29.4x |
| Total Debt | $1.73B | $2.94B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $267M | $2.40B |
GHC vs NWS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
GHC
NWS
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Graham Holdings Com… (GHC) | 100 | 314.8 | +214.8% |
| News Corporation (NWS) | 100 | 251.6 | +151.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GHC vs NWS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: GHC leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. News Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
GHC
Graham Holdings Company
The Growth Play
GHC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 2.5%, EPS growth -59.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.8%
- 2.5% revenue growth vs NWS's 2.4%
- Lower P/E (17.0x vs 29.4x)
Best for: growth exposure
NWS
News Corporation
The Income Pick
NWS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.58, yield 1.1%
- 158.3% 10Y total return vs GHC's 147.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.58, Low D/E 31.3%, current ratio 1.84x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | GHC | 2.5% revenue growth vs NWS's 2.4% |
| Value | GHC | Lower P/E (17.0x vs 29.4x) |
| Quality / Margins | NWS | 11.9% margin vs GHC's 7.9% |
| Stability / Safety | NWS | Beta 0.58 vs GHC's 0.87, lower leverage |
| Dividends | GHC | 0.6% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs NWS's 1.1% |
| Momentum (1Y) | GHC | +17.7% vs NWS's -4.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | NWS | 6.8% ROA vs GHC's 3.7%, ROIC 10.5% vs 3.3% |
GHC vs NWS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
GHC vs NWS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLGHCLAGGINGNWS
NWSNews Corporation
1leads
GHCGraham Holdings Compa…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs NWSMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
GHC5/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
NWS8/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
GHC5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — GHC and NWS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NWS is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.8B annually — 2.3x GHC's $3.7B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 11.9% (NWS) to 7.9% (GHC). On growth, NWS holds the edge at +8.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | GHCGraham Holdings C… | NWSNews Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.7B | $8.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $394M | $588M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $298M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $286M | $566M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.7% | +13.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | +9.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.9% | +11.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | +6.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +8.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +805.7% | +6.1% |
Evenly matched — GHC and NWS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
GHC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.0x trailing earnings, GHC trades at a 55% valuation discount to NWS's 38.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NWS's 10.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GHC's 15.0x.
| Metric | GHCGraham Holdings C… | NWSNews Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.9B | $16.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.4B | $17.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.96x | 38.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.02x | 29.38x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 6.24x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.03x | 10.94x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.00x | 2.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.01x | 1.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.32x | 23.23x |
GHC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NWS leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NWS delivers a 11.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $6 for GHC. NWS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.31x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GHC's 0.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NWS scores 8/9 vs GHC's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | GHCGraham Holdings C… | NWSNews Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.4% | +11.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.7% | +6.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.3% | +10.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.7% | +10.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.36x | 0.31x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.5B | $537M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $267M | $2.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.7B | $2.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.06x | 38.25x |
NWS leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GHC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GHC five years ago would be worth $17,634 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,554 for NWS. Over the past 12 months, GHC leads with a +17.7% total return vs NWS's -4.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GHC at 25.7% vs NWS's 22.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | GHCGraham Holdings C… | NWSNews Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.0% | +4.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +17.7% | -4.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +98.4% | +82.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +76.3% | +25.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +147.0% | +158.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.7% | +22.1% |
GHC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GHC and NWS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NWS is the less volatile stock with a 0.58 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GHC's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GHC currently trades 92.1% from its 52-week high vs NWS's 86.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | GHCGraham Holdings C… | NWSNews Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 0.58x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1224.76 | $35.58 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $882.21 | $25.49 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.1% | +86.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.8 | 58.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 19K | 1.4M |
Evenly matched — GHC and NWS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GHC and NWS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, NWS offers the higher dividend yield at 1.05% vs GHC's 0.64%.
| Metric | GHCGraham Holdings C… | NWSNews Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.6% | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 9 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $7.17 | $0.32 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +0.9% |
Evenly matched — GHC and NWS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
GHC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). NWS leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
Best OverallGraham Holdings Company (GHC)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
GHC vs NWS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GHC or NWS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Graham Holdings Company (GHC) is the stronger pick with 2.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 4% for News Corporation (NWS). Graham Holdings Company (GHC) offers the better valuation at 17. 0x trailing P/E (17. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate News Corporation (NWS) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GHC or NWS?
On trailing P/E, Graham Holdings Company (GHC) is the cheapest at 17.
0x versus News Corporation at 38. 1x. On forward P/E, Graham Holdings Company is actually cheaper at 17. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GHC or NWS?
Over the past 5 years, Graham Holdings Company (GHC) delivered a total return of +76.
3%, compared to +25. 5% for News Corporation (NWS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NWS returned +158. 3% versus GHC's +147. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GHC or NWS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), News Corporation (NWS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
58β versus Graham Holdings Company's 0. 87β — meaning GHC is approximately 51% more volatile than NWS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, News Corporation (NWS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 31% versus 36% for Graham Holdings Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GHC or NWS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Graham Holdings Company (GHC) is pulling ahead at 2.
5% versus 2. 4% for News Corporation (NWS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: News Corporation grew EPS 72. 3% year-over-year, compared to -59. 3% for Graham Holdings Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, GHC leads at 7. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GHC or NWS?
Graham Holdings Company (GHC) is the more profitable company, earning 6.
0% net margin versus 5. 5% for News Corporation — meaning it keeps 6. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NWS leads at 16. 7% versus 5. 1% for GHC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NWS leads at 56. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GHC or NWS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Graham Holdings Company (GHC) trades at 17.
0x forward P/E versus 29. 4x for News Corporation — 12. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — GHC or NWS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
News Corporation (NWS) offers the highest yield at 1. 1%, versus 0. 6% for Graham Holdings Company (GHC).
09Is GHC or NWS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, News Corporation (NWS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
58), 1. 1% yield, +158. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NWS: +158. 3%, GHC: +147. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GHC and NWS?
These companies operate in different sectors (GHC (Consumer Defensive) and NWS (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GHC is a small-cap deep-value stock; NWS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(GHC: -100.0% · NWS: 8.9%)Net Margin>
%
(GHC: 7.9% · NWS: 11.9%)P/E Ratio<
x
(GHC: 17.0x · NWS: 38.1x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.