GHC
Graham Holdings Company
Education & Training Services
Market Cap$4.90B
5Y Perf.+214.8%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
GHC vs SSP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
SSP
The E.W. Scripps Company
Broadcasting
Market Cap$552M
5Y Perf.-46.0%
GHC vs SSP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | GHC | SSP |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Education & Training Services | Broadcasting |
| Market Cap | $4.90B | $552M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.75B | $2.15B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $298M | $-101M |
| Gross Margin | 27.7% | 33.7% |
| Operating Margin | 7.1% | 7.5% |
| Forward P/E | 17.0x | 18.7x |
| Total Debt | $1.73B | $2.73B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $267M | $28M |
GHC vs SSP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
GHC
SSP
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Graham Holdings Com… (GHC) | 100 | 314.8 | +214.8% |
| The E.W. Scripps Co… (SSP) | 100 | 54.0 | -46.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GHC vs SSP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: GHC leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. The E.W. Scripps Company is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
GHC
Graham Holdings Company
The Income Pick
GHC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 0.87, yield 0.6%
- Rev growth 2.5%, EPS growth -59.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.8%
- 147.0% 10Y total return vs SSP's -66.5%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
SSP
The E.W. Scripps Company
The Momentum Pick
SSP is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +95.8% vs GHC's +17.7%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | GHC | 2.5% revenue growth vs SSP's -14.3% |
| Value | GHC | Lower P/E (17.0x vs 18.7x) |
| Quality / Margins | GHC | 7.9% margin vs SSP's -4.7% |
| Stability / Safety | GHC | Beta 0.87 vs SSP's 1.50, lower leverage |
| Dividends | GHC | 0.6% yield; 9-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | SSP | +95.8% vs GHC's +17.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | GHC | 3.7% ROA vs SSP's -2.0%, ROIC 3.3% vs 3.1% |
GHC vs SSP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
GHC vs SSP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLGHCLAGGINGSSP
SSPThe E.W. Scripps Comp…
0leads
GHCGraham Holdings Compa…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs SSPMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
GHC9/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
GHC4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
GHC2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
GHC1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — GHC and SSP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GHC is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.7B annually — 1.7x SSP's $2.2B. GHC is the more profitable business, keeping 7.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SSP's -4.7%. On growth, SSP holds the edge at -23.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | GHCGraham Holdings C… | SSPThe E.W. Scripps … |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.7B | $2.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $394M | $237M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $298M | -$101M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $286M | $7M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.7% | +33.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | +7.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.9% | -4.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | +0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -23.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +805.7% | -155.4% |
Evenly matched — GHC and SSP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — GHC and SSP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, GHC's 15.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SSP's 285.5x.
| Metric | GHCGraham Holdings C… | SSPThe E.W. Scripps … |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.9B | $552M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.4B | $3.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.96x | -2.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.02x | 18.72x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 6.24x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.03x | 285.46x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.00x | 0.26x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.01x | 0.33x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.32x | 84.68x |
Evenly matched — GHC and SSP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GHC leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GHC delivers a 6.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-8 for SSP. GHC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.36x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SSP's 2.19x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GHC scores 5/9 vs SSP's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | GHCGraham Holdings C… | SSPThe E.W. Scripps … |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.4% | -7.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.7% | -2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.3% | +3.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.7% | +3.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.36x | 2.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.5B | $2.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $267M | $28M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.7B | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.06x | 0.55x |
GHC leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GHC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GHC five years ago would be worth $17,634 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,312 for SSP. Over the past 12 months, SSP leads with a +95.8% total return vs GHC's +17.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GHC at 25.7% vs SSP's -16.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | GHCGraham Holdings C… | SSPThe E.W. Scripps … |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.0% | +18.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +17.7% | +95.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +98.4% | -40.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +76.3% | -76.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +147.0% | -66.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.7% | -16.1% |
GHC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GHC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GHC is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SSP's 1.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GHC currently trades 92.1% from its 52-week high vs SSP's 86.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | GHCGraham Holdings C… | SSPThe E.W. Scripps … |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 1.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1224.76 | $5.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $882.21 | $2.02 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.1% | +86.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.8 | 60.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 19K | 715K |
GHC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
GHC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
GHC is the only dividend payer here at 0.64% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | GHCGraham Holdings C… | SSPThe E.W. Scripps … |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $3.90 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 9 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $7.17 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% |
GHC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
GHC leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency and Total Returns. 2 categories are tied.
Best OverallGraham Holdings Company (GHC)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
GHC vs SSP: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GHC or SSP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Graham Holdings Company (GHC) is the stronger pick with 2.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 3% for The E. W. Scripps Company (SSP). Graham Holdings Company (GHC) offers the better valuation at 17. 0x trailing P/E (17. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The E. W. Scripps Company (SSP) a "Hold" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GHC or SSP?
On forward P/E, Graham Holdings Company is actually cheaper at 17.
0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GHC or SSP?
Over the past 5 years, Graham Holdings Company (GHC) delivered a total return of +76.
3%, compared to -76. 9% for The E. W. Scripps Company (SSP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GHC returned +147. 0% versus SSP's -66. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GHC or SSP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Graham Holdings Company (GHC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
87β versus The E. W. Scripps Company's 1. 50β — meaning SSP is approximately 71% more volatile than GHC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Graham Holdings Company (GHC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 36% versus 2% for The E. W. Scripps Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GHC or SSP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Graham Holdings Company (GHC) is pulling ahead at 2.
5% versus -14. 3% for The E. W. Scripps Company (SSP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Graham Holdings Company grew EPS -59. 3% year-over-year, compared to -285. 1% for The E. W. Scripps Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, GHC leads at 7. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GHC or SSP?
Graham Holdings Company (GHC) is the more profitable company, earning 6.
0% net margin versus -4. 7% for The E. W. Scripps Company — meaning it keeps 6. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SSP leads at 7. 5% versus 5. 1% for GHC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SSP leads at 33. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GHC or SSP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Graham Holdings Company (GHC) trades at 17.
0x forward P/E versus 18. 7x for The E. W. Scripps Company — 1. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — GHC or SSP?
In this comparison, GHC (0.
6% yield) pays a dividend. SSP does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GHC or SSP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Graham Holdings Company (GHC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
87), 0. 6% yield, +147. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GHC: +147. 0%, SSP: -66. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GHC and SSP?
These companies operate in different sectors (GHC (Consumer Defensive) and SSP (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GHC is a small-cap deep-value stock; SSP is a small-cap quality compounder stock. GHC pays a dividend while SSP does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(GHC: -100.0% · SSP: -23.1%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.