REIT - Diversified
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GIPR vs NTST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Retail
GIPR vs NTST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $1M | $1.72B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10M | $176M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-10M | $185K |
| Gross Margin | 74.1% | 92.4% |
| Operating Margin | -66.7% | 27.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 65.4x |
| Total Debt | $70M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $613K | $14M |
GIPR vs NTST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Generation Income P… (GIPR) | 100 | 3.8 | -96.2% |
| NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST) | 100 | 84.9 | -15.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GIPR vs NTST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GIPR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.73, yield 97.3%
- Better valuation composite
- 97.3% yield, vs NTST's 4.1%
NTST carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 30.0%, EPS growth 150.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.2%
- 41.9% 10Y total return vs GIPR's -56.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.05
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.0% FFO/revenue growth vs GIPR's 27.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.1% margin vs GIPR's -103.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.05 vs GIPR's 1.73 | |
| Dividends | 97.3% yield, vs NTST's 4.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +33.5% vs GIPR's -83.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.0% ROA vs GIPR's -9.5%, ROIC 2.1% vs -4.0% |
GIPR vs NTST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GIPR vs NTST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTST leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTST is the larger business by revenue, generating $176M annually — 17.7x GIPR's $10M. NTST is the more profitable business, keeping 0.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GIPR's -103.2%. On growth, NTST holds the edge at +27.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10M | $176M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1M | $133M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$10M | $185,000 |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $654,400 | $106M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +74.1% | +92.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -66.7% | +27.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -103.2% | +0.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.6% | +59.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.9% | +27.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.5% | +110.6% |
Valuation Metrics
GIPR leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1M | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $71M | $1.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.18x | 257.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 65.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.40x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 12.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.15x | 8.81x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.04x | 1.19x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.43x | 15.68x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NTST leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NTST delivers a 0.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $0 in annual profit, vs $-32 for GIPR. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NTST scores 6/9 vs GIPR's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -32.2% | +0.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -9.5% | +0.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.0% | +2.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.0% | +2.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.14x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $70M | -$14M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $612,939 | $14M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $70M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.20x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NTST leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NTST five years ago would be worth $11,752 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,342 for GIPR. Over the past 12 months, NTST leads with a +33.5% total return vs GIPR's -83.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTST at 8.6% vs GIPR's -42.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -59.3% | +17.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -83.5% | +33.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.8% | +28.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.6% | +17.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.2% | +41.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -42.3% | +8.6% |
Risk & Volatility
NTST leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NTST is the less volatile stock with a 0.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GIPR's 1.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NTST currently trades 96.6% from its 52-week high vs GIPR's 13.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.73x | 0.05x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.99 | $21.30 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.23 | $15.24 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +13.5% | +96.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.7 | 52.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
GIPR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, GIPR offers the higher dividend yield at 97.26% vs NTST's 4.05%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $22.03 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +97.3% | +4.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.26 | $0.83 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% |
NTST leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GIPR leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
GIPR vs NTST: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GIPR or NTST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NETSTREIT Corp.
(NTST) is the stronger pick with 30. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 27. 9% for Generation Income Properties, Inc. (GIPR). NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST) offers the better valuation at 257. 1x trailing P/E (65. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — GIPR or NTST?
Over the past 5 years, NETSTREIT Corp.
(NTST) delivered a total return of +17. 5%, compared to -76. 6% for Generation Income Properties, Inc. (GIPR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NTST returned +41. 9% versus GIPR's -56. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — GIPR or NTST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NETSTREIT Corp.
(NTST) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 05β versus Generation Income Properties, Inc. 's 1. 73β — meaning GIPR is approximately 3381% more volatile than NTST relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — GIPR or NTST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NETSTREIT Corp.
(NTST) is pulling ahead at 30. 0% versus 27. 9% for Generation Income Properties, Inc. (GIPR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NETSTREIT Corp. grew EPS 150. 0% year-over-year, compared to 38. 2% for Generation Income Properties, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GIPR leads at 35. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — GIPR or NTST?
NETSTREIT Corp.
(NTST) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 5% net margin versus -85. 5% for Generation Income Properties, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NTST leads at 25. 7% versus -52. 6% for GIPR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTST leads at 99. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — GIPR or NTST?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Generation Income Properties, Inc. (GIPR) offers the highest yield at 97. 3%, versus 4. 1% for NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST).
07Is GIPR or NTST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NETSTREIT Corp.
(NTST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 05), 4. 1% yield). Generation Income Properties, Inc. (GIPR) carries a higher beta of 1. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NTST: +41. 9%, GIPR: -56. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between GIPR and NTST?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.