Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GLIBA vs BATRK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
GLIBA vs BATRK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $842M | $2.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.05B | $732M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-309M | $-23M |
| Gross Margin | 39.9% | 19.9% |
| Operating Margin | -33.2% | 2.3% |
| Forward P/E | 6.5x | — |
| Total Debt | $1.15B | $837M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $424M | $112M |
GLIBA vs BATRK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| GCI Liberty, Inc. (GLIBA) | 100 | 39.3 | -60.7% |
| Atlanta Braves Hold… (BATRK) | 100 | 233.2 | +133.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GLIBA vs BATRK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GLIBA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.45
- Lower volatility, beta 0.45, Low D/E 67.6%, current ratio 3.14x
- Beta 0.45, current ratio 3.14x
BATRK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 10.5%, EPS growth 26.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.6%
- 222.7% 10Y total return vs GLIBA's -50.4%
- 10.5% revenue growth vs GLIBA's 5.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.5% revenue growth vs GLIBA's 5.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | -3.2% margin vs GLIBA's -29.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.45 vs BATRK's 0.51, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +26.7% vs GLIBA's -16.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -1.4% ROA vs GLIBA's -9.4%, ROIC 1.0% vs 5.5% |
GLIBA vs BATRK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GLIBA vs BATRK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — GLIBA and BATRK each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GLIBA and BATRK operate at a comparable scale, with $1.0B and $732M in trailing revenue. BATRK is the more profitable business, keeping -3.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GLIBA's -29.5%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $732M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$135M | $92M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$309M | -$23M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $122M | -$120M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.9% | +19.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -33.2% | +2.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -29.5% | -3.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.7% | -16.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -14.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -109.7% |
Valuation Metrics
GLIBA leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, GLIBA's 3.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BATRK's 36.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $842M | $2.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.6B | $3.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.72x | -138.32x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.53x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.57x | 36.31x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.80x | 3.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.49x | 6.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.90x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — GLIBA and BATRK each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BATRK delivers a -4.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-4 in annual profit, vs $-20 for GLIBA. GLIBA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.68x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BATRK's 1.56x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -20.4% | -4.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -9.4% | -1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.5% | +1.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.5% | +1.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.68x | 1.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $729M | $726M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $424M | $112M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.2B | $837M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.96x | 0.48x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BATRK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BATRK five years ago would be worth $18,503 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,357 for GLIBA. Over the past 12 months, BATRK leads with a +26.7% total return vs GLIBA's -16.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BATRK at 10.2% vs GLIBA's -5.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -24.3% | +28.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -16.4% | +26.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -16.4% | +34.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -16.4% | +85.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.4% | +222.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -5.8% | +10.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GLIBA and BATRK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GLIBA is the less volatile stock with a 0.45 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BATRK's 0.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BATRK currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs GLIBA's 64.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.45x | 0.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $41.87 | $52.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $26.40 | $37.76 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.9% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 34.4 | 73.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 41K | 354K |
Analyst Outlook
GLIBA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Consensus price targets imply 150.4% upside for GLIBA (target: $68) vs -3.3% for BATRK (target: $50).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $68.00 | $49.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
GLIBA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). BATRK leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
GLIBA vs BATRK: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GLIBA or BATRK a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc.
(BATRK) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — GLIBA or BATRK?
Over the past 5 years, Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc.
(BATRK) delivered a total return of +85. 0%, compared to -16. 4% for GCI Liberty, Inc. (GLIBA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BATRK returned +222. 7% versus GLIBA's -50. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — GLIBA or BATRK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), GCI Liberty, Inc.
(GLIBA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 45β versus Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 51β — meaning BATRK is approximately 15% more volatile than GLIBA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, GCI Liberty, Inc. (GLIBA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 68% versus 156% for Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — GLIBA or BATRK?
Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc.
(BATRK) is the more profitable company, earning -3. 2% net margin versus -29. 5% for GCI Liberty, Inc. — meaning it keeps -3. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GLIBA leads at 17. 0% versus 2. 3% for BATRK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GLIBA leads at 29. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Is GLIBA or BATRK more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GLIBA: 150.
4% to $68. 00.
06Which pays a better dividend — GLIBA or BATRK?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is GLIBA or BATRK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc.
(BATRK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 51), +222. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BATRK: +222. 7%, GLIBA: -50. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between GLIBA and BATRK?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare GLIBA vs LBRDA
LBRDA is one of the most direct listed alternatives to GLIBA.
Compare BATRK vs MSGE
MSGE is one of the most direct listed alternatives to BATRK.
Expand With CMCSA + FOXA
CMCSA and FOXA are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.