Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
GLUE vs ARVN vs KYMR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
GLUE vs ARVN vs KYMR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $1.11B | $457M | $6.77B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $43M | $89M | $51M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-130M | $-221M | $-315M |
| Gross Margin | 95.3% | 97.4% | 33.2% |
| Operating Margin | -345.2% | -279.3% | -7.0% |
| Total Debt | $39M | $9M | $82M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $130M | $143M | $357M |
GLUE vs ARVN vs KYMR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monte Rosa Therapeu… (GLUE) | 100 | 75.3 | -24.7% |
| Arvinas, Inc. (ARVN) | 100 | 11.7 | -88.3% |
| Kymera Therapeutics… (KYMR) | 100 | 171.1 | +71.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GLUE vs ARVN vs KYMR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GLUE has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth and momentum.
- 63.5% revenue growth vs KYMR's -16.7%
- +238.6% vs ARVN's -7.6%
ARVN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth -0.3%, EPS growth 53.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.0%
- -247.5% margin vs KYMR's -6.1%
KYMR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.90
- 149.4% 10Y total return vs GLUE's -19.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.90, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 10.47x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 63.5% revenue growth vs KYMR's -16.7% | |
| Quality / Margins | -247.5% margin vs KYMR's -6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.90 vs GLUE's 1.30, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 3 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +238.6% vs ARVN's -7.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -22.3% ROA vs ARVN's -28.4%, ROIC -24.9% vs -22.4% |
GLUE vs ARVN vs KYMR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
GLUE vs ARVN vs KYMR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARVN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARVN is the larger business by revenue, generating $89M annually — 2.1x GLUE's $43M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -2.5% (ARVN) to -6.1% (KYMR). On growth, KYMR holds the edge at +55.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $43M | $89M | $51M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$140M | -$245M | -$352M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$130M | -$221M | -$315M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$20M | -$257M | -$244M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +95.3% | +97.4% | +33.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.5% | -2.8% | -7.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.0% | -2.5% | -6.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -45.8% | -2.9% | -4.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -95.0% | -91.7% | +55.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.2% | -178.9% | +13.4% |
Valuation Metrics
ARVN leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $457M | $6.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.0B | $323M | $6.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -37.17x | -5.54x | -22.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.00x | 1.74x | 172.78x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.10x | 1.06x | 4.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ARVN leads this category, winning 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KYMR delivers a -25.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-25 in annual profit, vs $-44 for ARVN. ARVN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GLUE's 0.17x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GLUE scores 6/9 vs KYMR's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -41.0% | -44.4% | -25.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -25.9% | -28.4% | -22.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -44.2% | -22.4% | -24.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -16.3% | -16.0% | -27.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.02x | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$91M | -$134M | -$275M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $130M | $143M | $357M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $39M | $9M | $82M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | -2119.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KYMR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KYMR five years ago would be worth $16,412 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $868 for ARVN. Over the past 12 months, GLUE leads with a +238.6% total return vs ARVN's -7.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KYMR at 48.9% vs ARVN's -37.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.7% | -38.2% | +14.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +238.6% | -7.6% | +71.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +149.6% | -75.4% | +230.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.3% | -91.3% | +64.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.3% | -55.8% | +149.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +35.7% | -37.3% | +48.9% |
Risk & Volatility
KYMR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KYMR is the less volatile stock with a 0.90 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GLUE's 1.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KYMR currently trades 80.5% from its 52-week high vs ARVN's 48.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.30x | 1.16x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.77 | $14.51 | $103.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.12 | $6.06 | $36.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +66.4% | +48.9% | +80.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.4 | 21.3 | 47.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 818K | 802K | 493K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GLUE as "Buy", ARVN as "Buy", KYMR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 108.0% upside for ARVN (target: $15) vs 44.6% for KYMR (target: $120).
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $31.75 | $14.75 | $119.93 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 26 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +20.1% | 0.0% |
ARVN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). KYMR leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
GLUE vs ARVN vs KYMR: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GLUE or ARVN or KYMR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Monte Rosa Therapeutics, Inc.
(GLUE) is the stronger pick with 63. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). Analysts rate Monte Rosa Therapeutics, Inc. (GLUE) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — GLUE or ARVN or KYMR?
Over the past 5 years, Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
(KYMR) delivered a total return of +64. 1%, compared to -91. 3% for Arvinas, Inc. (ARVN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KYMR returned +149. 4% versus ARVN's -55. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — GLUE or ARVN or KYMR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
(KYMR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 90β versus Monte Rosa Therapeutics, Inc. 's 1. 30β — meaning GLUE is approximately 45% more volatile than KYMR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Arvinas, Inc. (ARVN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 17% for Monte Rosa Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — GLUE or ARVN or KYMR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Monte Rosa Therapeutics, Inc.
(GLUE) is pulling ahead at 63. 5% versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arvinas, Inc. grew EPS 53. 8% year-over-year, compared to -23. 8% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARVN leads at 26. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — GLUE or ARVN or KYMR?
Arvinas, Inc.
(ARVN) is the more profitable company, earning -30. 8% net margin versus -794. 4% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps -30. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ARVN leads at -43. 8% versus -891. 3% for KYMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KYMR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — GLUE or ARVN or KYMR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is GLUE or ARVN or KYMR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
(KYMR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 90), +149. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KYMR: +149. 4%, GLUE: -19. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between GLUE and ARVN and KYMR?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GLUE is a small-cap high-growth stock; ARVN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KYMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.