Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
GME vs BBY vs SPWH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
GME vs BBY vs SPWH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $10.73B | $12.29B | $55M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.63B | $41.69B | $1.21B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $418M | $1.07B | $-37M |
| Gross Margin | 33.0% | 22.5% | 31.2% |
| Operating Margin | 6.4% | 3.3% | -1.3% |
| Forward P/E | 24.2x | 9.0x | — |
| Total Debt | $4.36B | $4.13B | $455M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6.30B | $1.74B | $3M |
GME vs BBY vs SPWH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| GameStop Corp. (GME) | 100 | 2371.3 | +2271.3% |
| Best Buy Co., Inc. (BBY) | 100 | 75.0 | -25.0% |
| Sportsman's Warehou… (SPWH) | 100 | 12.7 | -87.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GME vs BBY vs SPWH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GME is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.94
- 232.2% 10Y total return vs BBY's 161.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.94, Low D/E 80.1%, current ratio 15.30x
BBY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 0.4%, EPS growth 17.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -3.4%
- 0.4% revenue growth vs SPWH's -7.0%
- Lower P/E (9.0x vs 24.2x)
SPWH plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 0.4% revenue growth vs SPWH's -7.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.0x vs 24.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.5% margin vs SPWH's -3.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.94 vs SPWH's 1.80, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.5% yield; 8-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -7.9% vs SPWH's -17.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.0% ROA vs SPWH's -3.9%, ROIC 18.7% vs -1.9% |
GME vs BBY vs SPWH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GME vs BBY vs SPWH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GME leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BBY is the larger business by revenue, generating $41.7B annually — 34.5x SPWH's $1.2B. GME is the more profitable business, keeping 11.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPWH's -3.1%. On growth, SPWH holds the edge at +1.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.6B | $41.7B | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $212M | $1.9B | $24M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $418M | $1.1B | -$37M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $490M | $1.3B | -$55M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.0% | +22.5% | +31.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.4% | +3.3% | -1.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.5% | +2.6% | -3.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.5% | +3.0% | -4.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -13.9% | -1.0% | +1.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -17.2% | +3.7% | -12.5% |
Valuation Metrics
SPWH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.6x trailing earnings, BBY trades at a 63% valuation discount to GME's 31.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BBY's 6.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GME's 37.8x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10.7B | $12.3B | $55M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.8B | $14.7B | $507M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 31.10x | 11.62x | -1.63x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 24.19x | 9.03x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 37.85x | 6.62x | 22.78x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.96x | 0.29x | 0.05x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.42x | 3.56x | 0.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.77x | 2.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BBY leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BBY delivers a 36.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $-18 for SPWH. GME carries lower financial leverage with a 0.80x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SPWH's 1.93x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BBY scores 7/9 vs GME's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.0% | +36.8% | -17.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.3% | +7.0% | -3.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.5% | +18.7% | -1.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.1% | +20.2% | -3.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.80x | 1.18x | 1.93x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.9B | $2.4B | $452M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6.3B | $1.7B | $3M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.4B | $4.1B | $455M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 19.90x | -1.26x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GME leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BBY five years ago would be worth $6,242 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $800 for SPWH. Over the past 12 months, GME leads with a -7.9% total return vs SPWH's -17.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GME at 5.3% vs SPWH's -38.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.1% | -14.0% | -2.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -7.9% | -8.8% | -17.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.8% | -3.6% | -77.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -40.5% | -37.6% | -92.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +232.2% | +161.1% | -87.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.3% | -1.2% | -38.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GME and BBY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GME is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPWH's 1.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BBY currently trades 68.9% from its 52-week high vs SPWH's 32.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.94x | 1.08x | 1.80x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $35.81 | $84.99 | $4.33 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.93 | $56.68 | $1.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +66.9% | +68.9% | +32.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.1 | 40.2 | 49.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.9M | 4.2M | 833K |
Analyst Outlook
BBY leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GME as "Hold", BBY as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 27.3% upside for BBY (target: $75) vs -23.8% for GME (target: $18). BBY is the only dividend payer here at 6.45% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.25 | $74.50 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 36 | 41 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +6.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 8 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.78 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.2% | +0.6% |
GME leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). BBY leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
GME vs BBY vs SPWH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GME or BBY or SPWH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Best Buy Co.
, Inc. (BBY) is the stronger pick with 0. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 0% for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. (SPWH). Best Buy Co. , Inc. (BBY) offers the better valuation at 11. 6x trailing P/E (9. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate GameStop Corp. (GME) a "Hold" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GME or BBY or SPWH?
On trailing P/E, Best Buy Co.
, Inc. (BBY) is the cheapest at 11. 6x versus GameStop Corp. at 31. 1x. On forward P/E, Best Buy Co. , Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GME or BBY or SPWH?
Over the past 5 years, Best Buy Co.
, Inc. (BBY) delivered a total return of -37. 6%, compared to -92. 0% for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. (SPWH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GME returned +232. 2% versus SPWH's -87. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GME or BBY or SPWH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), GameStop Corp.
(GME) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 80β — meaning SPWH is approximately 93% more volatile than GME relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, GameStop Corp. (GME) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 80% versus 193% for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GME or BBY or SPWH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Best Buy Co.
, Inc. (BBY) is pulling ahead at 0. 4% versus -7. 0% for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. (SPWH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: GameStop Corp. grew EPS 133. 3% year-over-year, compared to -13. 0% for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BBY leads at -3. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GME or BBY or SPWH?
GameStop Corp.
(GME) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 5% net margin versus -2. 8% for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GME leads at 6. 4% versus -1. 5% for SPWH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GME leads at 33. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GME or BBY or SPWH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Best Buy Co.
, Inc. (BBY) trades at 9. 0x forward P/E versus 24. 2x for GameStop Corp. — 15. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BBY: 27. 3% to $74. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — GME or BBY or SPWH?
In this comparison, BBY (6.
5% yield) pays a dividend. GME, SPWH do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GME or BBY or SPWH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Best Buy Co.
, Inc. (BBY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 08), 6. 5% yield, +161. 1% 10Y return). Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. (SPWH) carries a higher beta of 1. 80 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BBY: +161. 1%, SPWH: -87. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GME and BBY and SPWH?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GME is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BBY is a mid-cap deep-value stock; SPWH is a small-cap quality compounder stock. BBY pays a dividend while GME, SPWH do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.