GNSS vs WRAP

For growth investors, Genasys Inc.

(GNSS) is the stronger pick with 69. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 15. 4% for Wrap Technologies, Inc. (WRAP). The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Genasys Inc.

(GNSS) delivered a total return of -66. 6%, compared to -74. 7% for Wrap Technologies, Inc. (WRAP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GNSS returned +11. 1% versus WRAP's -70. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Genasys Inc.

(GNSS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 87β versus Wrap Technologies, Inc. 's 1. 94β — meaning WRAP is approximately 123% more volatile than GNSS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Wrap Technologies, Inc. (WRAP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 10% for Genasys Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Genasys Inc.

(GNSS) is pulling ahead at 69. 8% versus 15. 4% for Wrap Technologies, Inc. (WRAP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Genasys Inc. grew EPS 44. 4% year-over-year, compared to -37. 5% for Wrap Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GNSS leads at -9. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Genasys Inc.

(GNSS) is the more profitable company, earning -44. 4% net margin versus -198. 6% for Wrap Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps -44. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GNSS leads at -41. 2% versus -259. 2% for WRAP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WRAP leads at 51. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

In this comparison, WRAP (1.

4% yield) pays a dividend. GNSS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Genasys Inc.

(GNSS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87)). Wrap Technologies, Inc. (WRAP) carries a higher beta of 1. 94 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GNSS: +11. 1%, WRAP: -70. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

WRAP pays a dividend while GNSS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.