Leisure
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
GOLF vs DKS vs MODG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Leisure
GOLF vs DKS vs MODG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Leisure | Specialty Retail | Leisure |
| Market Cap | $5.24B | $20.22B | $2.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.61B | $17.22B | $4.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $171M | $849M | $-1.50B |
| Gross Margin | 47.5% | 32.9% | 64.6% |
| Operating Margin | 11.5% | 7.7% | -31.0% |
| Forward P/E | 24.1x | 15.6x | — |
| Total Debt | $1.07B | $4.49B | $4.14B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $50M | $1.69B | $445M |
GOLF vs DKS vs MODG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acushnet Holdings C… (GOLF) | 100 | 267.9 | +167.9% |
| DICK'S Sporting Goo… (DKS) | 100 | 616.4 | +516.4% |
| Topgolf Callaway Br… (MODG) | 100 | 93.7 | -6.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GOLF vs DKS vs MODG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GOLF has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.17, current ratio 2.38x
- PEG 1.24 vs DKS's 1.32
- 6.5% margin vs MODG's -37.1%
DKS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 1.45, yield 2.2%
- Rev growth 28.1%, EPS growth -29.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.7%
- 450.0% 10Y total return vs GOLF's 434.4%
MODG is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +80.6% vs DKS's +20.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 28.1% revenue growth vs MODG's -1.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.5% margin vs MODG's -37.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.17 vs MODG's 1.92, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs GOLF's 1.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +80.6% vs DKS's +20.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.0% ROA vs MODG's -19.9%, ROIC 13.3% vs -13.8% |
GOLF vs DKS vs MODG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GOLF vs DKS vs MODG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOLF leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DKS is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.2B annually — 6.6x GOLF's $2.6B. GOLF is the more profitable business, keeping 6.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MODG's -37.1%. On growth, DKS holds the edge at +59.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.6B | $17.2B | $4.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $342M | $1.4B | -$989M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $171M | $849M | -$1.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $89M | $399.7B | $35M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.5% | +32.9% | +64.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.5% | +7.7% | -31.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.5% | +4.9% | -37.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | +23.2% | +0.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.1% | +59.9% | -7.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -16.0% | -61.0% | -3.1% |
Valuation Metrics
DKS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.3x trailing earnings, DKS trades at a 23% valuation discount to GOLF's 28.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GOLF offers better value at 1.49x vs DKS's 1.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.2B | $20.2B | $2.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.3B | $23.0B | $6.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 28.88x | 22.29x | -1.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 24.08x | 15.56x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.49x | 1.90x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.88x | 12.66x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.05x | 1.17x | 0.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.82x | 0.00x | 0.96x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 43.68x | 0.05x | 26.73x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GOLF leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOLF delivers a 20.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-61 for MODG. DKS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MODG's 1.72x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MODG scores 6/9 vs DKS's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +20.8% | +0.1% | -60.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.0% | +6.1% | -19.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.3% | +0.0% | -13.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.3% | +0.0% | -16.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.37x | 0.00x | 1.72x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.0B | $2.8B | $3.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $50M | $1.7B | $445M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.1B | $4.5B | $4.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.17x | 19.04x | -5.38x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DKS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DKS five years ago would be worth $27,378 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,044 for MODG. Over the past 12 months, MODG leads with a +80.6% total return vs DKS's +20.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOLF at 20.9% vs MODG's -16.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.3% | +11.6% | +7.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.3% | +20.6% | +80.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +76.8% | +67.2% | -42.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +81.1% | +173.8% | -59.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +434.4% | +450.0% | +37.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.9% | +18.7% | -16.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GOLF and DKS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GOLF is the less volatile stock with a 1.17 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MODG's 1.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DKS currently trades 93.7% from its 52-week high vs MODG's 75.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.17x | 1.45x | 1.92x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $104.81 | $237.31 | $16.65 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $64.97 | $167.03 | $5.87 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.4% | +93.7% | +75.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 27.7 | 59.0 | 57.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 306K | 1.1M | 9.2M |
Analyst Outlook
DKS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GOLF as "Hold", DKS as "Buy", MODG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 15.2% upside for MODG (target: $15) vs 3.3% for GOLF (target: $93). For income investors, DKS offers the higher dividend yield at 2.19% vs GOLF's 1.05%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $92.50 | $251.43 | $14.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 21 | 63 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.0% | +2.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 10 | 11 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.94 | $4.86 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.0% | +1.7% | +1.4% |
DKS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). GOLF leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
GOLF vs DKS vs MODG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GOLF or DKS or MODG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc.
(DKS) is the stronger pick with 28. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 1% for Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. (MODG). DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc. (DKS) offers the better valuation at 22. 3x trailing P/E (15. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc. (DKS) a "Buy" — based on 63 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GOLF or DKS or MODG?
On trailing P/E, DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc.
(DKS) is the cheapest at 22. 3x versus Acushnet Holdings Corp. at 28. 9x. On forward P/E, DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Acushnet Holdings Corp. wins at 1. 24x versus DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc. 's 1. 32x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GOLF or DKS or MODG?
Over the past 5 years, DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc.
(DKS) delivered a total return of +173. 8%, compared to -59. 6% for Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. (MODG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DKS returned +450. 0% versus MODG's +37. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GOLF or DKS or MODG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Acushnet Holdings Corp.
(GOLF) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 17β versus Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. 's 1. 92β — meaning MODG is approximately 63% more volatile than GOLF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc. (DKS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 172% for Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GOLF or DKS or MODG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc.
(DKS) is pulling ahead at 28. 1% versus -1. 1% for Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. (MODG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Acushnet Holdings Corp. grew EPS -8. 0% year-over-year, compared to -1776. 6% for Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DKS leads at 11. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GOLF or DKS or MODG?
DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc.
(DKS) is the more profitable company, earning 49. 3% net margin versus -34. 1% for Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. — meaning it keeps 49. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOLF leads at 11. 5% versus -29. 7% for MODG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MODG leads at 62. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GOLF or DKS or MODG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Acushnet Holdings Corp. (GOLF) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 24x versus DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc. 's 1. 32x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc. (DKS) trades at 15. 6x forward P/E versus 24. 1x for Acushnet Holdings Corp. — 8. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MODG: 15. 2% to $14. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — GOLF or DKS or MODG?
In this comparison, DKS (2.
2% yield), GOLF (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. MODG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GOLF or DKS or MODG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Acushnet Holdings Corp.
(GOLF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 17), 1. 0% yield, +434. 4% 10Y return). Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. (MODG) carries a higher beta of 1. 92 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GOLF: +434. 4%, MODG: +37. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GOLF and DKS and MODG?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GOLF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DKS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MODG is a small-cap quality compounder stock. GOLF, DKS pay a dividend while MODG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.