GOOS
Canada Goose Holdings Inc.
Apparel - Manufacturers
Market Cap$549M
5Y Perf.-39.0%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
GOOS vs HBI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
HBI
Hanesbrands Inc.
Apparel - Manufacturers
Market Cap$2.29B
5Y Perf.-34.4%
GOOS vs HBI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | GOOS | HBI |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Manufacturers | Apparel - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $549M | $2.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.46B | $3.44B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $22M | $330M |
| Gross Margin | 70.2% | 42.0% |
| Operating Margin | 5.4% | 13.1% |
| Forward P/E | 14.9x | 9.8x |
| Total Debt | $743M | $2.55B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $334M | $215M |
GOOS vs HBI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
GOOS
HBI
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canada Goose Holdin… (GOOS) | 100 | 61.0 | -39.0% |
| Hanesbrands Inc. (HBI) | 100 | 65.6 | -34.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GOOS vs HBI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: GOOS and HBI are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Hanesbrands Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
GOOS
Canada Goose Holdings Inc.
The Income Pick
GOOS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.32
- Rev growth 1.1%, EPS growth 70.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.1%
- -25.9% 10Y total return vs HBI's -62.6%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
HBI
Hanesbrands Inc.
The Value Play
HBI is the clearest fit if your priority is value and quality.
- Lower P/E (9.8x vs 14.9x)
- 9.6% margin vs GOOS's 1.5%
- 7.7% ROA vs GOOS's 1.2%, ROIC 4.5% vs 12.5%
Best for: value and quality
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | GOOS | 1.1% revenue growth vs HBI's -3.6% |
| Value | HBI | Lower P/E (9.8x vs 14.9x) |
| Quality / Margins | HBI | 9.6% margin vs GOOS's 1.5% |
| Stability / Safety | GOOS | Beta 1.32 vs HBI's 1.72, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | GOOS | +43.5% vs HBI's +32.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | HBI | 7.7% ROA vs GOOS's 1.2%, ROIC 4.5% vs 12.5% |
GOOS vs HBI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2024
GOOS vs HBI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLGOOSLAGGINGHBI
HBIHanesbrands Inc.
1leads
GOOSCanada Goose Holdings…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs HBIMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
GOOS4/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
GOOS6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
HBI3/5
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — GOOS and HBI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HBI is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.4B annually — 2.4x GOOS's $1.5B. HBI is the more profitable business, keeping 9.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GOOS's 1.5%. On growth, GOOS holds the edge at +14.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | GOOSCanada Goose Hold… | HBIHanesbrands Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.5B | $3.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $185M | $496M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $22M | $330M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $186M | -$8M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.2% | +42.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.4% | +13.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.5% | +9.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.7% | -0.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.2% | -4.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.2% | +8.0% |
Evenly matched — GOOS and HBI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
GOOS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, GOOS's 5.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HBI's 16.6x.
| Metric | GOOSCanada Goose Hold… | HBIHanesbrands Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $549M | $2.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $849M | $4.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.75x | -7.11x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.86x | 9.82x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.54x | 16.64x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.56x | 0.65x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.86x | 66.99x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.74x | 10.11x |
GOOS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HBI delivers a 73.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $74 in annual profit, vs $4 for GOOS. GOOS carries lower financial leverage with a 1.33x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HBI's 75.02x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GOOS scores 8/9 vs HBI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | GOOSCanada Goose Hold… | HBIHanesbrands Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.7% | +73.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +7.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.5% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.3% | +5.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.33x | 75.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $408M | $2.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $334M | $215M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $743M | $2.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.96x | 2.15x |
GOOS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HBI leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HBI five years ago would be worth $3,362 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,754 for GOOS. Over the past 12 months, GOOS leads with a +43.5% total return vs HBI's +32.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HBI at 14.2% vs GOOS's -16.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | GOOSCanada Goose Hold… | HBIHanesbrands Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -11.9% | — |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +43.5% | +32.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.1% | +49.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.5% | -66.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -25.9% | -62.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.6% | +14.2% |
HBI leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GOOS and HBI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GOOS is the less volatile stock with a 1.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HBI's 1.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HBI currently trades 91.8% from its 52-week high vs GOOS's 77.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | GOOSCanada Goose Hold… | HBIHanesbrands Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.32x | 1.72x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.43 | $7.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.19 | $3.96 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.2% | +91.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.2 | 44.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 386K | 104.2M |
Evenly matched — GOOS and HBI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates GOOS as "Hold" and HBI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 62.3% upside for GOOS (target: $19) vs 12.1% for HBI (target: $7).
| Metric | GOOSCanada Goose Hold… | HBIHanesbrands Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.33 | $7.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
GOOS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). HBI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
Best OverallCanada Goose Holdings Inc. (GOOS)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
GOOS vs HBI: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GOOS or HBI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Canada Goose Holdings Inc.
(GOOS) is the stronger pick with 1. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 6% for Hanesbrands Inc. (HBI). Canada Goose Holdings Inc. (GOOS) offers the better valuation at 16. 8x trailing P/E (14. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hanesbrands Inc. (HBI) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GOOS or HBI?
On forward P/E, Hanesbrands Inc.
is actually cheaper at 9. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GOOS or HBI?
Over the past 5 years, Hanesbrands Inc.
(HBI) delivered a total return of -66. 4%, compared to -72. 5% for Canada Goose Holdings Inc. (GOOS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOS returned -25. 9% versus HBI's -62. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GOOS or HBI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Canada Goose Holdings Inc.
(GOOS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 32β versus Hanesbrands Inc. 's 1. 72β — meaning HBI is approximately 30% more volatile than GOOS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Canada Goose Holdings Inc. (GOOS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 133% versus 75% for Hanesbrands Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GOOS or HBI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Canada Goose Holdings Inc.
(GOOS) is pulling ahead at 1. 1% versus -3. 6% for Hanesbrands Inc. (HBI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Canada Goose Holdings Inc. grew EPS 70. 2% year-over-year, compared to -1698. 4% for Hanesbrands Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GOOS leads at 7. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GOOS or HBI?
Canada Goose Holdings Inc.
(GOOS) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 0% net margin versus -9. 1% for Hanesbrands Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOOS leads at 12. 2% versus 5. 3% for HBI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GOOS leads at 69. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GOOS or HBI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Hanesbrands Inc.
(HBI) trades at 9. 8x forward P/E versus 14. 9x for Canada Goose Holdings Inc. — 5. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GOOS: 62. 3% to $19. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — GOOS or HBI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is GOOS or HBI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Canada Goose Holdings Inc.
(GOOS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Hanesbrands Inc. (HBI) carries a higher beta of 1. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GOOS: -25. 9%, HBI: -62. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GOOS and HBI?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GOOS is a small-cap deep-value stock; HBI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(GOOS: 14.2% · HBI: -4.8%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.