Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
GOSS vs AVXL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
GOSS vs AVXL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $38M | $232M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $56M | — |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-180M | $-40M |
| Gross Margin | 99.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -321.9% | — |
| Total Debt | $202M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $38M | $103M |
GOSS vs AVXL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gossamer Bio, Inc. (GOSS) | 100 | 1.2 | -98.8% |
| Anavex Life Science… (AVXL) | 100 | 50.8 | -49.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GOSS vs AVXL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
In this particular matchup, GOSS is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
AVXL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.77
- EPS growth -3.8%
- -38.3% 10Y total return vs GOSS's -99.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -34.9% revenue growth vs GOSS's -57.7% | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.5% margin vs GOSS's -324.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.77 vs GOSS's 2.45 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -69.6% vs GOSS's -87.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -35.0% ROA vs GOSS's -96.1% |
GOSS vs AVXL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GOSS vs AVXL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AVXL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $56M | — |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$178M | -$39M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$180M | -$40M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$170M | -$34M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +99.6% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.2% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.2% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.1% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +71.5% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -25.0% | +54.4% |
Valuation Metrics
AVXL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $38M | $232M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $202M | $129M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.22x | -4.63x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.78x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
AVXL leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AVXL scores 2/9 vs GOSS's 0/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -38.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -96.1% | -35.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -107.5% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -86.1% | -47.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 0 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $164M | -$103M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $38M | $103M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $202M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -15.50x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AVXL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AVXL five years ago would be worth $1,191 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $184 for GOSS. Over the past 12 months, AVXL leads with a -69.6% total return vs GOSS's -87.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AVXL at -33.9% vs GOSS's -48.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -94.4% | -32.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -87.3% | -69.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.9% | -71.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.2% | -88.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.1% | -38.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -48.0% | -33.9% |
Risk & Volatility
AVXL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AVXL is the less volatile stock with a 1.77 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GOSS's 2.45 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AVXL currently trades 17.9% from its 52-week high vs GOSS's 4.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.45x | 1.77x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.87 | $13.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.14 | $2.41 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +4.2% | +17.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 34.1 | 36.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10.7M | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates GOSS as "Buy" and AVXL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 373.6% upside for GOSS (target: $1) vs 340.0% for AVXL (target: $11).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $0.77 | $11.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
AVXL leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics.
GOSS vs AVXL: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GOSS or AVXL a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Gossamer Bio, Inc.
(GOSS) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — GOSS or AVXL?
Over the past 5 years, Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
(AVXL) delivered a total return of -88. 1%, compared to -98. 2% for Gossamer Bio, Inc. (GOSS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AVXL returned -38. 3% versus GOSS's -99. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — GOSS or AVXL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
(AVXL) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 77β versus Gossamer Bio, Inc. 's 2. 45β — meaning GOSS is approximately 38% more volatile than AVXL relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — GOSS or AVXL?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
grew EPS -3. 8% year-over-year, compared to -200. 0% for Gossamer Bio, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — GOSS or AVXL?
Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
(AVXL) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -351. 5% for Gossamer Bio, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AVXL leads at 0. 0% versus -336. 8% for GOSS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GOSS leads at 97. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — GOSS or AVXL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is GOSS or AVXL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
(AVXL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Gossamer Bio, Inc. (GOSS) carries a higher beta of 2. 45 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AVXL: -38. 3%, GOSS: -99. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between GOSS and AVXL?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.