Restaurants
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
HDL vs BJRI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Restaurants
HDL vs BJRI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $7.83B | $859M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $805M | $1.41B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $55M | $44M |
| Gross Margin | 29.0% | 74.7% |
| Operating Margin | 24.0% | 3.0% |
| Forward P/E | 20.2x | 17.5x |
| Total Debt | $213M | $491M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $255M | $24M |
HDL vs BJRI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SUPER HI INTERNATIO… (HDL) | 100 | 66.9 | -33.1% |
| BJ's Restaurants, I… (BJRI) | 100 | 116.7 | +16.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HDL vs BJRI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HDL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.25
- Rev growth 13.4%, EPS growth -17.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.25, Low D/E 58.8%, current ratio 2.51x
BJRI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -6.3% 10Y total return vs HDL's -39.1%
- Lower P/E (17.5x vs 20.2x)
- +9.0% vs HDL's -35.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.4% revenue growth vs BJRI's 3.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.5x vs 20.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.8% margin vs BJRI's 3.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.25 vs BJRI's 1.40, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +9.0% vs HDL's -35.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.8% ROA vs BJRI's 4.4%, ROIC 45.9% vs 4.1% |
HDL vs BJRI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HDL leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BJRI is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 1.7x HDL's $805M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 6.8% (HDL) to 3.1% (BJRI). On growth, HDL holds the edge at +9.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $805M | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $255M | $123M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $55M | $44M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $73M | $80M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.0% | +74.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.0% | +3.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | +3.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.1% | +5.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.1% | +2.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -29.3% |
Valuation Metrics
BJRI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.9x trailing earnings, BJRI trades at a 95% valuation discount to HDL's 359.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BJRI's 10.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HDL's 32.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.8B | $859M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.8B | $1.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 359.26x | 18.93x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.18x | 17.51x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 32.42x | 10.79x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 10.05x | 0.61x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 21.66x | 2.53x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 92.19x | 21.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HDL leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HDL delivers a 14.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $12 for BJRI. HDL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.59x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BJRI's 1.34x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BJRI scores 7/9 vs HDL's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.6% | +12.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.8% | +4.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +45.9% | +4.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +39.1% | +5.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.59x | 1.34x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$42M | $467M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $255M | $24M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $213M | $491M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.48x | 15.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BJRI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BJRI five years ago would be worth $6,884 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,092 for HDL. Over the past 12 months, BJRI leads with a +9.0% total return vs HDL's -35.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BJRI at 10.9% vs HDL's -15.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -17.4% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -35.3% | +9.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.1% | +36.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.1% | -31.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.1% | -6.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -15.2% | +10.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HDL and BJRI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HDL is the less volatile stock with a 0.25 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BJRI's 1.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BJRI currently trades 86.9% from its 52-week high vs HDL's 57.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.25x | 1.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.62 | $47.02 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.06 | $28.46 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +57.5% | +86.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.4 | 61.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1K | 366K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates HDL as "Buy" and BJRI as "Buy".
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $40.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +7.9% |
HDL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BJRI leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
HDL vs BJRI: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HDL or BJRI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SUPER HI INTERNATIONAL HOLDING Ltd.
American Depositary Shares (HDL) is the stronger pick with 13. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 1% for BJ's Restaurants, Inc. (BJRI). BJ's Restaurants, Inc. (BJRI) offers the better valuation at 18. 9x trailing P/E (17. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SUPER HI INTERNATIONAL HOLDING Ltd. American Depositary Shares (HDL) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HDL or BJRI?
On trailing P/E, BJ's Restaurants, Inc.
(BJRI) is the cheapest at 18. 9x versus SUPER HI INTERNATIONAL HOLDING Ltd. American Depositary Shares at 359. 3x. On forward P/E, BJ's Restaurants, Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HDL or BJRI?
Over the past 5 years, BJ's Restaurants, Inc.
(BJRI) delivered a total return of -31. 2%, compared to -39. 1% for SUPER HI INTERNATIONAL HOLDING Ltd. American Depositary Shares (HDL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BJRI returned -6. 3% versus HDL's -39. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HDL or BJRI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SUPER HI INTERNATIONAL HOLDING Ltd.
American Depositary Shares (HDL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 25β versus BJ's Restaurants, Inc. 's 1. 40β — meaning BJRI is approximately 467% more volatile than HDL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SUPER HI INTERNATIONAL HOLDING Ltd. American Depositary Shares (HDL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 59% versus 134% for BJ's Restaurants, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HDL or BJRI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SUPER HI INTERNATIONAL HOLDING Ltd.
American Depositary Shares (HDL) is pulling ahead at 13. 4% versus 3. 1% for BJ's Restaurants, Inc. (BJRI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BJ's Restaurants, Inc. grew EPS 208. 6% year-over-year, compared to -17. 8% for SUPER HI INTERNATIONAL HOLDING Ltd. American Depositary Shares. Over a 3-year CAGR, HDL leads at 35. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HDL or BJRI?
BJ's Restaurants, Inc.
(BJRI) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 5% net margin versus 2. 8% for SUPER HI INTERNATIONAL HOLDING Ltd. American Depositary Shares — meaning it keeps 3. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HDL leads at 25. 2% versus 3. 3% for BJRI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BJRI leads at 74. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HDL or BJRI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, BJ's Restaurants, Inc.
(BJRI) trades at 17. 5x forward P/E versus 20. 2x for SUPER HI INTERNATIONAL HOLDING Ltd. American Depositary Shares — 2. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — HDL or BJRI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is HDL or BJRI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SUPER HI INTERNATIONAL HOLDING Ltd.
American Depositary Shares (HDL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 25)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HDL: -39. 1%, BJRI: -6. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HDL and BJRI?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.