Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

HII vs NOC

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
HII
Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.

Aerospace & Defense

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$12.39B
5Y Perf.+57.4%
NOC
Northrop Grumman Corporation

Aerospace & Defense

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$78.41B
5Y Perf.+64.7%

HII vs NOC — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
HII logoHII
NOC logoNOC
IndustryAerospace & DefenseAerospace & Defense
Market Cap$12.39B$78.41B
Revenue (TTM)$12.85B$42.37B
Net Income (TTM)$605M$4.58B
Gross Margin12.4%20.5%
Operating Margin4.9%11.1%
Forward P/E18.2x19.8x
Total Debt$3.15B$19.74B
Cash & Equiv.$774M$4.40B

HII vs NOCLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

HII
NOC
StockMay 20May 26Return
Huntington Ingalls … (HII)100157.4+57.4%
Northrop Grumman Co… (NOC)100164.7+64.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: HII vs NOC

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HII leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Northrop Grumman Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
HII
Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.
The Growth Play

HII carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 8.2%, EPS growth 10.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.4%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.69, Low D/E 62.0%, current ratio 1.13x
  • Beta 0.69, yield 1.7%, current ratio 1.13x
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
NOC
Northrop Grumman Corporation
The Income Pick

NOC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 22 yrs, beta 0.03, yield 1.6%
  • 186.0% 10Y total return vs HII's 130.7%
  • 10.8% margin vs HII's 4.7%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthHII logoHII8.2% revenue growth vs NOC's 2.2%
ValueHII logoHIILower P/E (18.2x vs 19.8x)
Quality / MarginsNOC logoNOC10.8% margin vs HII's 4.7%
Stability / SafetyNOC logoNOCBeta 0.03 vs HII's 0.69
DividendsHII logoHII1.7% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs NOC's 1.6%
Momentum (1Y)HII logoHII+39.1% vs NOC's +15.5%
Efficiency (ROA)NOC logoNOC9.1% ROA vs HII's 4.9%, ROIC 10.2% vs 6.2%

HII vs NOC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

HIIHuntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.
FY 2025
Newport News Shipbuilding
51.5%$6.5B
Ingalls
24.4%$3.1B
Mission Technologies
24.1%$3.0B
NOCNorthrop Grumman Corporation
FY 2025
Aeronautics Systems
31.0%$13.0B
Mission Systems
29.8%$12.5B
Space Systems
25.7%$10.8B
Defense Systems
19.1%$8.0B
Intersegment Eliminations
-5.5%$-2,317,000,000

HII vs NOC — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNOCLAGGINGHII

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

NOC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

NOC is the larger business by revenue, generating $42.4B annually — 3.3x HII's $12.8B. NOC is the more profitable business, keeping 10.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HII's 4.7%. On growth, HII holds the edge at +13.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricHII logoHIIHuntington Ingall…NOC logoNOCNorthrop Grumman …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$12.8B$42.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$953M$6.2B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$605M$4.6B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$1.1B$3.3B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+12.4%+20.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+4.9%+11.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+4.7%+10.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+8.2%+7.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+13.4%+4.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year0.0%+84.9%
NOC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

HII leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 19.0x trailing earnings, NOC trades at a 7% valuation discount to HII's 20.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HII's 15.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NOC's 16.3x.

MetricHII logoHIIHuntington Ingall…NOC logoNOCNorthrop Grumman …
Market CapShares × price$12.4B$78.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$14.8B$93.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS20.45x18.98x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.18.15x19.76x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.15x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple15.76x16.30x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.99x1.87x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.44x4.76x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF15.61x23.71x
HII leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NOC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

NOC delivers a 28.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $12 for HII. HII carries lower financial leverage with a 0.62x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NOC's 1.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HII scores 9/9 vs NOC's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricHII logoHIIHuntington Ingall…NOC logoNOCNorthrop Grumman …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+12.0%+28.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+4.9%+9.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.2%+10.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+6.4%+11.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–996
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.62x1.18x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$2.4B$15.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$774M$4.4B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$3.1B$19.7B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense8.86x8.92x
NOC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — HII and NOC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NOC five years ago would be worth $15,925 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,671 for HII. Over the past 12 months, HII leads with a +39.1% total return vs NOC's +15.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HII at 19.4% vs NOC's 9.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricHII logoHIIHuntington Ingall…NOC logoNOCNorthrop Grumman …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-9.6%-5.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+39.1%+15.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+70.2%+30.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+56.7%+59.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+130.7%+186.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+19.4%+9.3%
Evenly matched — HII and NOC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

NOC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

NOC is the less volatile stock with a 0.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HII's 0.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricHII logoHIIHuntington Ingall…NOC logoNOCNorthrop Grumman …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.69x0.03x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$460.00$774.00
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$215.05$453.01
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+68.4%+71.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10021.919.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded476K760K
NOC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — HII and NOC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates HII as "Hold" and NOC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 33.5% upside for HII (target: $420) vs 32.5% for NOC (target: $731). For income investors, HII offers the higher dividend yield at 1.72% vs NOC's 1.63%.

MetricHII logoHIIHuntington Ingall…NOC logoNOCNorthrop Grumman …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$420.00$731.46
# AnalystsCovering analysts2735
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.7%+1.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1322
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.42$8.99
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+2.1%
Evenly matched — HII and NOC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

NOC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HII leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallNorthrop Grumman Corporation (NOC)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

HII vs NOC: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is HII or NOC a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.

(HII) is the stronger pick with 8. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 2% for Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC). Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) offers the better valuation at 19. 0x trailing P/E (19. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) a "Buy" — based on 35 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — HII or NOC?

On trailing P/E, Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) is the cheapest at 19.

0x versus Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. at 20. 4x. On forward P/E, Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 18. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — HII or NOC?

Over the past 5 years, Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) delivered a total return of +59.

3%, compared to +56. 7% for Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. (HII). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NOC returned +186. 0% versus HII's +130. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — HII or NOC?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

03β versus Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. 's 0. 69β — meaning HII is approximately 2303% more volatile than NOC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. (HII) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 62% versus 118% for Northrop Grumman Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — HII or NOC?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.

(HII) is pulling ahead at 8. 2% versus 2. 2% for Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. grew EPS 10. 2% year-over-year, compared to 2. 6% for Northrop Grumman Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, HII leads at 5. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — HII or NOC?

Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) is the more profitable company, earning 10.

0% net margin versus 4. 8% for Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NOC leads at 10. 2% versus 4. 9% for HII. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NOC leads at 19. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is HII or NOC more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.

(HII) trades at 18. 2x forward P/E versus 19. 8x for Northrop Grumman Corporation — 1. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HII: 33. 5% to $420. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — HII or NOC?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. (HII) offers the highest yield at 1. 7%, versus 1. 6% for Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC).

09

Is HII or NOC better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

03), 1. 6% yield, +186. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NOC: +186. 0%, HII: +130. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between HII and NOC?

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

HII

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NOC

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 6%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform HII and NOC on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(HII: 13.4% · NOC: 4.4%)
Net Margin>
%
(HII: 4.7% · NOC: 10.8%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(HII: 20.4x · NOC: 19.0x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.