HIMX vs CRUS

For growth investors, Cirrus Logic, Inc.

(CRUS) is the stronger pick with 5. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 2% for Himax Technologies, Inc. (HIMX). Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) offers the better valuation at 21. 9x trailing P/E (18. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Himax Technologies, Inc. (HIMX) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Cirrus Logic, Inc.

(CRUS) is the cheapest at 21. 9x versus Himax Technologies, Inc. at 61. 7x. On forward P/E, Cirrus Logic, Inc. is actually cheaper at 18. 9x.

Over the past 5 years, Cirrus Logic, Inc.

(CRUS) delivered a total return of +124. 1%, compared to +45. 3% for Himax Technologies, Inc. (HIMX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CRUS returned +421. 3% versus HIMX's +87. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cirrus Logic, Inc.

(CRUS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 12β versus Himax Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 22β — meaning HIMX is approximately 99% more volatile than CRUS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 66% for Himax Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cirrus Logic, Inc.

(CRUS) is pulling ahead at 5. 3% versus -8. 2% for Himax Technologies, Inc. (HIMX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cirrus Logic, Inc. grew EPS 30. 7% year-over-year, compared to -43. 5% for Himax Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CRUS leads at 1. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Cirrus Logic, Inc.

(CRUS) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 7% net margin versus 5. 3% for Himax Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CRUS leads at 23. 0% versus 5. 3% for HIMX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CRUS leads at 52. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Cirrus Logic, Inc.

(CRUS) trades at 18. 9x forward P/E versus 71. 2x for Himax Technologies, Inc. — 52. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CRUS: -15. 5% to $145. 00.

In this comparison, HIMX (2.

3% yield) pays a dividend. CRUS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Cirrus Logic, Inc.

(CRUS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 12), +421. 3% 10Y return). Himax Technologies, Inc. (HIMX) carries a higher beta of 2. 22 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CRUS: +421. 3%, HIMX: +87. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

HIMX pays a dividend while CRUS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.