HLNE vs GCMG

For growth investors, Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) is the stronger pick with 28.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 15. 8% for GCM Grosvenor Inc. (GCMG). Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) offers the better valuation at 17. 1x trailing P/E (15. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) is the cheapest at 17.

1x versus GCM Grosvenor Inc. at 328. 3x. On forward P/E, GCM Grosvenor Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) delivered a total return of +11.

5%, compared to +0. 8% for GCM Grosvenor Inc. (GCMG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HLNE returned +483. 9% versus GCMG's +37. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), GCM Grosvenor Inc.

(GCMG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 89β versus Hamilton Lane Incorporated's 1. 25β — meaning HLNE is approximately 40% more volatile than GCMG relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) is pulling ahead at 28.

7% versus 15. 8% for GCM Grosvenor Inc. (GCMG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: GCM Grosvenor Inc. grew EPS 112. 3% year-over-year, compared to 46. 6% for Hamilton Lane Incorporated. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) is the more profitable company, earning 30.

5% net margin versus 3. 6% for GCM Grosvenor Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HLNE leads at 44. 4% versus 14. 0% for GCMG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HLNE leads at 70. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, GCM Grosvenor Inc.

(GCMG) trades at 12. 7x forward P/E versus 15. 3x for Hamilton Lane Incorporated — 2. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GCMG: 113. 1% to $24. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) offers the highest yield at 2. 7%, versus 1. 0% for GCM Grosvenor Inc. (GCMG).

For long-horizon retirement investors, GCM Grosvenor Inc.

(GCMG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 89), 1. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GCMG: +37. 9%, HLNE: +483. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.