HTFL vs IRTC

For growth investors, Heartflow, Inc.

Common Stock (HTFL) is the stronger pick with 39. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 26. 2% for iRhythm Technologies, Inc. (IRTC). Analysts rate Heartflow, Inc. Common Stock (HTFL) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, iRhythm Technologies, Inc.

(IRTC) delivered a total return of +57. 1%, compared to +5. 4% for Heartflow, Inc. Common Stock (HTFL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IRTC returned +351. 8% versus HTFL's +5. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), iRhythm Technologies, Inc.

(IRTC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 93β versus Heartflow, Inc. Common Stock's 2. 00β — meaning HTFL is approximately 114% more volatile than IRTC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Heartflow, Inc. Common Stock (HTFL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 5% for iRhythm Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Heartflow, Inc.

Common Stock (HTFL) is pulling ahead at 39. 9% versus 26. 2% for iRhythm Technologies, Inc. (IRTC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: iRhythm Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 61. 7% year-over-year, compared to 8. 1% for Heartflow, Inc. Common Stock. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

iRhythm Technologies, Inc.

(IRTC) is the more profitable company, earning -6. 0% net margin versus -66. 3% for Heartflow, Inc. Common Stock — meaning it keeps -6. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IRTC leads at -4. 9% versus -36. 4% for HTFL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HTFL leads at 76. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, iRhythm Technologies, Inc.

(IRTC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 93), +351. 8% 10Y return). Heartflow, Inc. Common Stock (HTFL) carries a higher beta of 2. 00 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IRTC: +351. 8%, HTFL: +5. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.